• NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Pretty sure I had a bigger hard drive than that for my Amiga. You could have broken a toe if you’d dropped it.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    no thanks Seagate. the trauma of losing my data because of a botched firmware with a ticking time bomb kinda put me off your products for life.

    see you in hell.

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Is Seagate still producing shitty drives that fail a few days after the warranty expired?

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Makes me shudder. I have to replace a drive in my array, because it is degraded. It’s a 4TB. Imagine having to replace one of these. I’d much rather have a bunch of cheaper drives, even if they are a bit more expensive per TB, because the replacement cost will eventually make the total cost of ownership lower.

    Also, repeat with me: “Please give me a Toshiba or Hitachi, please”

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      More like zero, cause modern AAA games require an NVME (or at least an SSD) and this is a good old fashioned 7200 RPM drive.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          A lot of modern AAA games require an SSD, actually.

          On top of my head: Cyberpunk, Marvel’s Spider-Man 2, Hogwarts Legacy, Dead Space remake, Starfield, Baulder’s Gate 3, Palworld, Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart

          • TyrantTW@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Indeed, as others have said this isn’t a hard requirement. Anyone with a handheld (e.g. Steam Deck) playing off a uSD card uses a device that’s an order of magnitude slower for sequential I/O

            • wewbull@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              They stream data from it while you play, so if you don’t have an SSD you’ll get pauses in game play.

              • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                Sure, you might.

                But Baulder’s Gate 3 for example, which claims to require an SSD in it’s system requirements runs just fine on a HDD.

                It’s just the developer making sure you get optimal performance.

            • Psythik@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I can personally guarantee that it is a hard requirement for Spider-Man and Ratchet

  • daggermoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I wanna fuck this HDD. To have that much storage on one drive when I currently have ~30TB shared between 20 drives makes me very erect.

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Do people actually use such massive hard drives? I still have my 1 TB HDD in my PC (and a 512 GB SSD), lol.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Data hoarders could be happy, but otherwise it’s mostly enterprise use.

      Still, I personally hold about 4 TB of files, and I know people holding over 30 TB.

      As soon as your storage needs exceed 1-2 games and a bunch of old photos, demand for space raises quickly.

      • JordanZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s fine…they don’t need to release it under their Exos line of enterprise drives. SMR don’t do well in raid arrays especially not highly utilized ones. They require idle time to cleanup and the rebuild times are horrendous.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      For affordable set it and forget it cold storage, this is incredible. For anything actively being touched, yeah definitely a pass.

    • daggermoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      In my experience, not all Seagates will fail but most HDD’s that fail will be Seagates.

        • daggermoon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The thing is I’m a data hoarder who buys lots of HDD’s; both new and used. I have only bought a few Seagates. It’s always the Seagates that are fucked. I had a Toshiba and Western Digital fail on me but I have had 5 Seagates fail on me. Could be a coincidence, sure but the brand I have bought the fewest of had the most failures. I recognize this is not scientific in any way. I recently bought a brand new 8TB Seagate Barracuda and its still going strong. I hope if lasts a good while. My oldest drive is a 1TB Hitachi (RIP) from 2008. I can’t wait for 8TB SSD’s to become cheaper.

          • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Nah, as a fellow data hoarder you’re 100% correct. I have a couple of dozen disks, and I’ve had failures from both Seagate and WD, but the Seagates have failed much more often. For the past couple of years, I’ve only purchased WD for this reason. I’m down to two Seagate drives now.

            I feel like many people with a distaste for WD got burned by the consumer drives (especially the WD Greens). WD’s DC line is so good though, especially HC530.

            • daggermoon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I mostly buy new Toshiba drives now. The WD blue drives are fine. I have a few of them. I have a WD red that is reporting surface errors, it’s still going and the number of errors hasn’t increased so I’m not stressing replacing it. Also, btrfs gives me peace of mind because I can periodiclly check if my filesystem has corrupted data.

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Well, largest this week. And

    Yeah, $800 isn’t a small chunk of change, but for a hard drive of this capacity, it’s monumentally cheap.

    Nah, a 24TB is $300 and some 20TB’s are even lower $ per TB.

    • JordanZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Depends on your use case. The linked drive according to seagate’s spec sheet is only rated for about ~6.5 power-on hours per day(2400 per year). So if just in your desktop for storage then sure. In an always (or mostly) on NAS then I’d find a different drive. It’ll work fine but expect higher failure rates for that use.

    • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Omg I really have been out of the loop. I originally filled my 8 bay NAS with 6tb drives starting back in 2018. Once they would fill, i added another. 3 years ago, I finally ran out of space and started swapping out the 6tb for 10tb. Due to how it works, I needed to do 2 before I saw any additional space. I think i have 3 or 4 now, and the last one was 2 years ago. They did cost around $250 at the time, and I think i got 1 for just over $200. The fact that I can more than double that for only $300 is crazy news to me. Guess I am going to stop buying 10tb now. The only part that sucks is having to get 2 up front…

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I paid $600+ for a 24 TB drive, tax free. I feel robbed. Although I’m glad not to shop at Newegg.

      • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yes, fuck Newegg (and amazon too). I’ve been using B&H for disks and I have no complaints about them. They have the Seagate Ironwolf Pro 24TB at $479 currently, but last week it was on sale for $419. (I only look at 5yr warranty disks.)

        I was not in a position to take advantage as I’ve already made my disk purchase this go around, so I’ll wait for the next deep discount to hit if it is timely.

        • solrize@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          I hate amazon but haven’t been following stuff about newegg and have been buying from them now and then. No probs so far but yeah, B&H is also good. Also centralcomputer.com if you are in the SF bay area. Actual stores.

          • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Newegg was the nerd’s paradise 10+ years ago. I would spend thousands each year on my homelab back then. They had great customer service and bent over backwards for them. Then they got bought out and squeezed and passed that squeeze right down to the customers. Accusing customers of damaging parts, etc. Lots of slimeball stuff. They also wanted to be like amazon, so they started selling beads, blenders and other assorted garbage alongside tech gear.

            After a couple of minor incidents with them I saw the writing on the wall and went to amazon who were somewhat okay then. Once amazon started getting bad, I turned to B&H and fleaBay. I don’t buy as much electronic stuff as I used to, but when I do these two are working…so far.

    • Armand1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I got some 16TB drives recently for around $200 each, though they were manufacturer recertified. Usually a recertified drive will save you 20-40%. Shipping can be a fortune though.

      EDIT: I used manufacturer recertified, not refurbished drives.

        • Armand1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          As mentioned by another user, all drives fail, it’s a matter of when, not if. Which is why you should always use RAID arrangement with at least one redundant drive and/or have full backups.

          Ultimately, it’s a money game. If you save 30% on a recertified drive and it has 20% less total life than a new one, you’re winning.

          Here’s where I got some.

          https://serverpartdeals.com/collections/manufacturer-recertified-drives

          I looked around a bit, and either search engines suck nowadays (possibly true regardless) or there are no independent studies comparing certified and new drives.

          All you get mostly opinion pieces or promises by resellers that actually, their products are good. Clearly no conflict of interest there. /s

          The best I could find was this, but that’s not amazing either.

          What I do is look at backblaze’s drive stats for their new drives, find a model that has a good amount of data and low failure rate, then get a recertified one and hope their recertification process is good and I don’t get a lemon.

        • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I would absolutely not use refurbs personally. As part of the refurb process they wipe the SMART data which means you have zero power-on hours listed, zero errors, rewrite-count, etc - absolutely no idea what their previous life was.

          • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            If you’ve got a RAID array with 1 or 2 parity then manufacturer recertified drives are fine; those are typically drives that just aged out before being deployed, or were traded in when a large array upgraded.

            If you’re really paranoid you should be mixing mfg dates anyway, so keep some factory new and then add the recerts so the drive pools have a healthy split.

            • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Yep staggering manufacturing dates is a good suggestion. I do it but it does make purchasing during sales periods to get good prices harder. Better than losing multiple drives at once, but RAID needs a backup anyway and nobody should skip that step.

              • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                58 minutes ago

                I mean a backup of a RAID pool is likely just another RAID pool (ideally off-site) – maybe a tape library if you’ve got considerable cash.

                Point is that mfg refurbs are basically fine, just be responsible, if your backup pool runs infrequently then that’s a good candidate for more white label drives.

  • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It will take about 36 hours to fill this drive at 270mb/s

    That’s a long time to backup your giraffe porn collection.