Got a workspace. Funnily enough, spent the while morning cleaning it because it was horrifically dusty, just after having spent the whole day on Sunday cleaning up my workspace at home for rather much the same reason.

At least there is air conditioning in the building.

Enid Blyton. Lovely concepts, but there was a bit of racism that crept in, just from the time that it was written. Even if a lot of it was largely relegated to stereotypes.

deleted by creator

The seasons are also smaller. Take the episode count, for example. Season 1 of TNG was 26 episodes. Discovery’s S1, by comparison, is only 15.

That’s ten whole episodes of development space lost, which could have gone to stretching out the season plot, or building out the characters.

I don’t think it was. It was them putting the triage tag on themselves that seems to have put it into a loop, at least going by the progression of events.

The user put on the tag, the bot removes the tag, because only maintainers can put that on, and then puts on the tag, after which it removes it because someone who wasn’t a maintainer put the tag on.

I could see exit being an issue if you’re doing something in the CLI that might cause you to type that without passing it as a command (“What do you want the program to do after the task is complete?” “Exit”), but I’m not familiar enough with the program to say one way or the other.

In fairness, it is off-topic, since a lot of it is more commentary about AI, rather than talking about the repo, or the issue. The only comment that could arguably be relevant is the person saying that the user could also use CTRL-D to exit the program.

The repo might be for an AI tool, but I’m fairly sure that the bot isn’t itself LLM-powered. It’s just your basic generic bot.

From what I can tell, they want the program to close when you write exit instead of /exit. Guessing it currently does the latter, and does a “did you mean /exit” sort of thing.

In fairness, this isn’t an LLM issue, but a poorly made bot issue. An old fashioned bot would be equally vulnerable to doing it, assuming it isn’t one.

IMO it’s more to do with the Network/producers wanting to play it safe, since Star Trek is a big franchise, and thus a reliable cash cow now. Either that or it’s a victim of its own fame. No-one wants to be the one who ruined Star Trek, for example.

Parts of the US threatened to take the original series off the air because it was so socially progressive, and I feel like the subsequent series haven’t quite lived up to that part of the legacy, because they don’t want to risk much.

The most emblematic of this, I feel, is the shift to the 32nd century. There was a lot of potential there, and a lot of it was just thrown away to reset everything back to something recognisable, just with a shiny new coat of paint. You would expect them to have at least moved on from warp drives, phasers, and quantum torpedoes a millennium after the fact, or that they would be almost entirely unrecognisable.

Plus people are mean all the time. We don’t live in a comic book world, where a moment of fury at someone on the internet turns people into supervillains.

Wasn’t a lot of their tomfoolery why people relocated to Reddit to begin with?

The old technologies that we used to use for websites never really went away. They’re still around, and you can use them to make websites again if you want.

It’s just that it won’t be as fancy looking as a newer web-site, but you don’t lose too much on functionality.

Burger. Especially if it’s not too tall, and thus a perfect height for eating with.

Sometimes, you just need a flat food structure.

It also stops them from getting attention, and dissuades people who might commit similar crimes for the notoriety.

I hope that they do actually add something interesting.

One of the most disappointing things about the 31st century transition was that it felt like very little actually changed, other than a futuristic coat of paint.

Visuals aside, it seemed like all technological progress stopped about 500 years ago.

All Trek is woke. Always was.

If anything, I’d argue it to have the reverse problem, where it’s been gradually less progressive over time, since the network isn’t as willing to take risks with the property, now it’s a relatively safe cash cow.

Where’s the Star Trek show that people threaten to pull off the air because it is at the social cutting edge?

I’m more surprised she didn’t end them first when she realised breakfast was to be late.

Especially since servers can do more sophisticated cooling systems than the average home user, like dunking the entire system in oil.

Probably less that and more that he was asked to/promised something if he did.