• Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    My girlfriend is sometimes a turkey and she loves to be eaten. She asks to be eaten. Sometimes, when she’s really in need, she begs for me you eat her. I have no idea what the original post was talking about

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Has PETA ever asked lettuce if it gave consent to being eaten?

    I mean, I’m all for a decreased consumption of meat, but PETA’s methods don’t work.

  • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    My neighbor tried to raise some turkeys for Christmas. Those were bred to grow really quickly but his timing was off. They have to be slaughtered within a small window before they get too fat and their hearts give out. He had to do an early Christmas.

      • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        A lot of people live this way too. They just keep working and getting fatter until they die of a heart attack at 60

      • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It’s pretty common for animals in the meat industry. A broiler chicken goes from hatching to supermarket in 6 weeks. That’s what’s being called efficiency these days.

        • vaionko@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I worked at a broiler farm one summer. 35 days is the time from when they arrive to when they leave to get slaughtered.

    • ranzispa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Don’t know about the small window thing. We had turkeys for a while, but to be fair it was more about domestic animals than food source. Those things would get huge. I remember once some friends were coming to visit at night and seeing them on the roof got scared and ran off.

      • AsoFiafia@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Seeing a turkey on someone’s roof might scare me off, too. Turkeys can be bastards.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    21 hours ago

    A lot of plants don’t want to be eaten either. Tough shit, I am hungry.

    • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Vegan Bullshit Bingo #22

      Plants have feelings too

      No, they do not. There is no serious study to suggest that they do. Plants do not have a brain or central nervous system. At most, they respond to stimuli. If you really care that much about the welfare of plants, you should go vegan, since many more plants “die” for animal feeding.
      Do you feel bad while mowing your lawn? And would you rather rescue a potted plant than a dog from a burning house? Is docking pig tails the same as branch trimming to you? Question upon question…

      • hans@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        to the extent that they don’t understand that they themselves might die, plants don’t want too be eaten any more than they want to keep living. the same is true for animals

          • hans@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            they may have emotions, but this doesn’t entail that they understand personal mortality.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              They understand it the same way we do. Just because we created stories and religion around it doesnt mean we experience it any different. They understand, just like we do, pain is bad and food and water are good. Just because we can write papers about the subject doesnt make the feeling different.

                • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Not wanting to die/wanting to stay alive is proof animals understand mortality. Its the same impulses that keep humans alive as well.

              • hans@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                They understand it the same way we do.

                if you could point me to the animal cognitive-behaviorist paper that supports this claim, i’d be happy to read it

                I think you are making that up

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        What part of “Tough shit, I am hungry” made you think I care about the desires of the plant?

      • madjo@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Plants communicate.

        Those tears you shed when cutting onions is because of a defence mechanism of the onion, the scent you smell when cutting grass is another.

        We also know that fungi and trees communicate with eachother as well. They even help eachother gain nutrients.

        • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Yeah, agreed. Life wants to live. Pain and fear is something animals feel so they can get away from potential harm. If you’re immobile like a plant, it doesn’t make sense to feel pain because you can’t run. You don’t need to have a brain nor a central nervous system to deal with that.
          70% of global crops are fed to animals. Stop eating animals and grow forests instead, to make our planet healthier.

          • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            It’s closer to 30%.

            About 80% of the biomass of the food grown for human consumption is fed to livestock as well. That may be where you’re getting that number? That’s being insanely generous. What we’re talking about is like, corn stalks, squash vines, that kind of shit. The parts of the plants humans cannot physically eat but none the less must produce to feed ourselves.

            I’m sure the irony of your bullshit bingo card is completely lost on you but you haven’t said anything that strictly speaking could be interpreted as true in this thread.

          • x4740N@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            More greenwashing

            I’m surprised how much lemmy lets vegans get away with the greenwashing stuff

          • hans@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            70% of global crops are fed to animals.

            no, they’re not. why would you lie about something so easy to find the truth?

    • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Some do, actually. Most plants that taste good basically rely on being eaten as part of their reproductive cycle.

    • theolodis@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Wanna guess how many plants are wasted to feed animals, only for humans to eat them?

      • hans@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        none. not really. if we are using it, it’s not wasted, and much of what we feed livestock is plants or parts of plants that people can’t or won’t eat

      • x4740N@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Wanna know how many of those plants are waste product only and plants only suitable for animal consumption

        Do you see a human eating hay

        Cut the greenwashing crap

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Is hay the only thing that can grow on that land? Could we grow food humans like instead?

          You do need to think things through a bit more than that.

      • Artemis_Mystique@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Plants that humans wouldnt be able to digest efficiently anyway, unlesss you are talking about the more bourgeois meats

          • x4740N@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            You do realise it’s waste product not suitable for human consumption

            For example waste spy product from the production of your soy milk which also uses a ton of water and drives deforestation

            The farms also kill farm pests with use of farming machines, pesticides and shotguns

          • hans@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            people don’t want to eat field corn, but the soy that is given to livestock is mostly the waste product from pressing soybeans for oil

        • Gladaed@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Not all animals are the same. Killing an endangered dolphin weighs much different to eating a mussel.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Well you should probably stop eating fish then, because trawling absolutely does kill dolphins. Its called by-catch.

            • Gladaed@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Do you understand what am example is? Most fishing trawlers don’t fish in the Amazonas river. So you are somewhat wrong.

          • theolodis@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            So you’d recommend only eating animals until they are endangered and then eating other animals until they are no longer? Is that what you want to express?

            Or are you arguing that some animals are more sentient than others (e.g. mammals vs mussels), and we should switch to eating snails and mussels only, because of that?

            • Gladaed@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Just saying their figure is completely irrelevant since not all are created equally.

              We should probably substitute meat by eating more mollusks. They are rather eco friendly. And insects, probably.

              A chicken is also much smaller than a cow.

      • big_slap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago
        • Plants don’t want to be eaten.
        • Plants don’t want to be eaten.
        • Plants don’t want to be eaten.
        • Plants don’t want to be eaten.
        • Plants don’t want to be eaten.
        • Plants don’t want to be eaten.
        • Plants don’t want to be eaten.
        • theolodis@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          To be completely fair, some plants actually produce fruits with the intent of them being eaten, because that’s their way of Zoochorie/Hemerochorie

    • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      49 minutes ago

      It’s more like fascists trying to steal a symbol ngl.

      Like highschoolers will have a phase where they use a wolf pfp online and talk about how they wished they were a horse archer for example.

      Not necessarily politics. The party “gray wolves” on the other hand is fucking openly fascist.

    • Bababasti@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      You‘re getting downvoted but I agree with you. The joke in the image is funny, but the presence of these grey wolve emojis suggests affiliation with the Grey Wolves which are fascist. No debating that, I don’t get the other comments here.

      • hayvan@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        No they are not right. I can’t know the political views of someone in some shitpost, but the original grey wolf symbolim comes from Turkic mythology, which is today being co-opted by racist fucks. It still gets used ironically to make fun of those fucks (just like posting Musk’s Nazi salute doesn’t automatically make you a nazi if you are making fun of him).

        In addition, some people want to reclaim the symbolism, because it’s ancient mythology, why would we leave it to them, right?

    • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Wtf are you on about? They don’t get to decide what symbols belong to them. Ok 👌? 🐸 Fuck Nazi’s appropriating culture for themselves. Iirc the style of this comment indicates their membership in THE PACK AAYROOOO

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Feels like the gray wolf isn’t defined enough as a fascist symbol that there’s plenty of latitude for non-fascists to use it. Like if that account is known to use it that way it’s one thing, but otherwise it’s probably just a coincidence. The swastika is the most widely known symbol of hate these days but even now you can go see it on all kinds of temples in Asia, so if even that gets used in a non-nazi way these days surely the gray wolf isn’t only defined as a fascist symbol.

          • menas@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Here Grey wolf are regularly attacking in the street, sometime with knife, and some murder of exiled people opposed to Erdogan seems to be related to this guys. Just fascists

          • Gladaed@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Gray Wolf in conjunction with Turkish flag and arms fire is pretty unique. Smells like Nazi.

            You get sensitized if it’s in the news regularly. I would expect it to be less well known oversees.

        • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I don’t remember what the name of the logical fallacy where you conflate a small problem with a big one, but that’s what you’re doing. It’s a poor argument regardless of the context.

    • Ygest Wefsid@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Are not grey wolves a cultural symbol related to an old turkish tale? Does not look facist to me.

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        In the Turkish diaspora they are used as a dog whistle for Turkish nationalist. Good dog whistle too. You don’t hear it.

      • hayvan@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yes they are. It’s a bunch of armchair political experts confidently talking out of their buttholes.

        There IS a racist political movement, which is often referred as Grey Wolves abroad who think they own the symbol, but leaving an ancient cultural story to a bunch of fucks is the stupidest thing ever. This is the same level of stupid as saying Pepe the Frog is a white supremacist symbol.

        • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I’m not letting some obscure group of fucking Turks claim a goddamn emoji as their own and stop using it myself. Same with Pepe, a 🐸 emoji, or 👌. They already have the swastika and a bunch of others from the ACTUAL Nazis, let them use those instead.

        • Ygest Wefsid@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Ah so this is about an organization named “grey wolves” known for their hostile worldviews, not the grey wolf from the historical tale about a she-wolf raising a human children? This could have been elaborated better.