• innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It will always fall on the driver of the vehicle, as it should. I don’t care how self driving your car is, it has a steering wheel, an accelerator pedal, and a brake pedal and in the driver seat YOU are responsible with how you operate your vehicle. If u decide to trust a self driving feature that’s YOUR mistake. I would love to blame all these crashes on Tesla but the reality is that all these drivers aids and self driving cars having accidents is proof that you should be the one in control of your own vehicle. No crying about how the automotive nannies didn’t stop you from crashing the vehicle your driving, take responsibility. Don’t like it? Don’t trust the “self driving” nonsense (read: glorified advanced cruise control). Now one thing I don’t agree with is advertising as self driving, and I strongly believe self driving vehicles in public roadways should be ILLEGAL!

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Except the problem here is Tesla is lying about a product to encourage people to use it illegally and unsafely. At some point there’s extra deaths to blame solely on tesla’s lies.

        • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Can you point to one of those lies? Because every time I push the FSD button it says ‘keep hands on the wheel be prepared to take over at any time’ right there on the screen.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Full Self Driving, the name of the feature is literally a lie. Its used all over in the marketing for the vehicle. Most car companies call comparable features “driving assistance” or “lane control” etc.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      TBF, if they’re going to lock you in a burning car unable to exit, killing you with the dashboard or sterring column would be a mercy killing compared to burning to death inside.

      replace the airbag with a letal injection perhaps?

      /s

  • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 day ago

    Adaptive cruise control is good enough for most people and has been a proven technology for 20+ years. FSD is just downright dangerous.

    • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I like my car’s version that’s just adaptive cruise control combined with using lidar maps of major roads to do lane-centering. I can go on a road trip and not touch the gas, break, or steering wheel for hours, but I have to drive it myself through residential neighborhoods.

        • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Cadillac CT5

          They’ll even pass slow cars then get back over.

          And none of that “touch the steering wheel every few min” stuff, but it uses infrared pupil trackers to make sure you’re mostly looking at the road and not sleeping.

          • jmf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            The idea of infrared pupil trackers is terrifying.

            Imagine the tracking potential for insurance companies, law enforcement, etc…

            I know this is offtopic, just the first thought that comes to my mind :(

          • possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            yeah that’s definitely going to be a bit higher spec than my Wilderness lmao. The Outback will maintain lane and do centering but does not like even moderate turns, roads with questionable paint, or gusty conditions. It’s great for highway use and it definitely won’t pass other cars for me, but it will take me pretty far off the beaten path as long as I’m not trying to follow a jeep. Hell yeah, sounds like we’ve both got solid cars that fit our needs.

  • webdox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 day ago

    He’s been real quiet lately. No more talks of release the list or the America Party. Did his K plug go on vacation?

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      Now trump is black bagging US citizens in broad daylight, and Musk is an immigrant who fully admitted that he originally entered the country illegally. The danger must have creeped its way through his ketamine addled brain.

      • architect@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I can promise you he doesn’t even think about that.

        He’s busy with his little Internet cult right now and I’m assuming some other malicious bullshit to fuck us with.

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Musk also has a private army of security contractors (and someone like him probably has mercenaries off killing people in other countries too)

        he’s far too much trouble to go after, if you’re DHS, regardless if you’re Trump DHS or Democrat DHS. someone like that is ungovernable.

      • AxExRx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        He didnt buy ihs gold plated visa?

        Maybe while he was doing the DOGE thing he changed his status.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Need jammers to confuse and break Teslas. They’re weapons designed to break laws and protect occupants at the expense of bystanders. Can’t be mad if a bystander redirects your Tesla into a ditch.

    • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      protect occupants

      It doesn’t even do that. You crash a tesla and start a fire, it will glady lock you in the car.

    • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      as long as it doesn’t break the other ones. not all of the safety features we’ve developed in the last quarter century are bullshit

      • architect@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Eh I have a hard time believing anything made or done in the last 20ish years was done for anything other than money.

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hmm. I think lane-assist probably makes people worse at driving. Anything that lets people pay less attention on the road does, it trains drivers to be less alert. Adaptive cruise and automatic braking are probably a net benefit but “car safety” is not trending in the right direction.

        • innermachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Despite all these “safety features” accidents are far more common now than 20 years ago. “Driver aids” do nothing but encourage bad behaviour, better off just PAYING ATTENTION to the 2 ton steel cage your throwing down a concrete cheese grater at 60+mph…

  • MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    2 days ago

    When a self driving car breaks the law, the CEO should get the demerit points on their own licence, and if they lose their licence, the cars can’t drive anymore.

    • thepompe@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Man, holding the company financially accountable for all traffic violations would be magnificent.

      It’s a shame we’re too stupid/weak to pull it off.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Somebody needs to be responsible, otherwise ban self driving until someone figures it out. Impound the vehicle if need be.

      • Bubippbasbir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        What? You can’t just demand accountability from AI bros, that would destroy their whole business model.

    • tlmcleod@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      The second one of these cars cause a fatal collision due to wanton disregard of the law on part of the CEO, he should be held criminally liable.

    • drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 days ago

      That would be funny but better yet, the entire line of cars gets the feature deleted from them and customers are reimbursed the entire value of the car plus interest in exchange for having risked their lives testing an unstable and dangerous vehicle.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      They shouldn’t even be able to market it as self driving if they don’t insure the self driving mode itself.

    • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      CEOs like you’re talking about, they dont drive.

      the only time they’ll step behind the wheel of a car is for a pleasure cruise in some multi million dollar supercar on a track, or a closed / private road.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        So what? Them driving is not relevant to this at all. The idea is that the cars they sell become illegal.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    239
    ·
    2 days ago

    you, too, can die at the hands of AI and become forever enshrined as algorithmic data to help improve Tesla’s subscription services sales to the very wealthy and hostile

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep. This is inevitable. Whenever we get to the point where consumers are controlling the aggression of the self driving, which will happen no matter laws are past.

      Ultimately it’s all just code on hardware.

      Tesla is definitely doing their fuck around, still waiting to find out on this one. Eventually that liability will catch up with them. The question is months, years, or decades.

  • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    which comes with higher speeds and more frequent lane changes

    Go kiss a concrete pillar, ya duds