• Etlaris@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Alternative version: … – What are your demands?

    • Deploy – I demand you have a day off.
  • squaresinger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 day ago

    In my last job we called that “optimizing”, after a colleague (who usually only did frontent work) used the opportunity when everyone else was on vacation to implement a few show-stopping bugs in the backend and put “optimized backend code” in the commit message. He did the same thing a few months later during the next vacation period, which really solidified the joke.

    • bier@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 day ago

      Worked with a guy that would always say I’m refactoring X and it would usually give us weird issues and bugs. So after a while the team started calling it refucktoring

    • Mose13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Whatapp is for business, and signal is for official government communication

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Both are quite secure but neither of them stop an idiot on one end or the other from sharing the contents with the public.

        • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I always find it funny how many people fail to understand the “end to end” part of end to end encryption.

          If your endpoint isn’t secure then the messages aren’t.

        • hypnicjerk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          24 hours ago

          whatsapp is closed source and meta owned. i think it’s incredibly foolish to trust that it has no backdoors built in.

          • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            That’s not how encryption works. But you’re not wrong about it being owned by meta being a problem. There’s more info in a message than just the contents.

            • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              you say that but they’re already thinking a step ahead and assuming meta left a backdoor or CVE at the behest of 3-letter agencies.

              What’s facebook’s business plan? Right, surveillance capitalism.

              • ptu@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                11 hours ago

                IIRC whatsapp’s automatic backups are stored in cloud and unencrypted by default. So it takes only one person in the group chat who has backups enabled (pop up reminds periodically if not) and no password is set (not required, takes effort and will to set) to leak everyone’s messages.

              • airgapped@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                I assume no encryption is safe from three letter gangs, at this point I’m only concerned with keeping grubby corporate fingers at bay.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Works better than Teams.

      Probably has better privacy and confidentiality options too.

    • Spykee@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s “WhatsApp for Business” & “WhatsApp Business Solutions”.
      Catch-up, grandpa!

      • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m aware the technologies exist - I can’t fathom wanting my sensitive communications served by meta.

        Also, grandma* - my pronouns are right there.

            • buttnugget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Wait, what confusion? I use Voyager and I have no confusion about who is whom. I can see in the lower reply box that you are [email protected].

              The only issue with pronouns is that people who assume default maleness should be locked up anyway, so that’s an entirely separate issue.

              • Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                People who assume default maleness should be locked up anyway

                Huh? What the heck did i just read?

              • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                Context is important and voyager does not provide that. Many people respond to the wrong person in threads. For example you just replied to me about pronouns which isn’t my topic.

            • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Tbf, I don’t read unames, and my app shows the pronouns in line with and the same color as the unames, so I don’t read those either.

              Literally no clue who I’m even responding to right now. Doesn’t really matter who it is either, my response would be the same regardless of your race/gender/whatever else.

              The one exception is whenever I see something profoundly stupid I will sometimes check the uname and go “ah yes cowbee again how predictable” but that’s just pure entertainment and learning who here not to waste energy on, most comments are just comments and don’t warrant that level of self preservation.

      • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think those are for sales, like b2c advertising. Not for how your business talks to each other internally to destroy databases.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    269
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “good morning, I’m about to destroy the backend” is exactly the energy I’d welcome from a colleague frankly.

    I think the outage that followed as we fumbled to replace it would probably be cheaper than the ongoing maintenance after a few months

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not deploying the backend doesn’t make it a day off.

      The coworker probably got the message right and knows about some integration problem the poster doesn’t know about.

    • tooclose104@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      2 days ago

      A typo in software development or other shell based work could completely ass womp a system in ways that could lose a company lots of money.

      Oopsies on prod systems, even with an outage window, can really fuck shit up. Seemingly small mistakes can quickly snowball into systemwide outages.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s wild to me how some places I’ve worked are like locked down, all the infrastructure is in terraform or whatever and can be deployed immediately… and other places are like “ssh into prod with the credentials from confluence, edit the config in vim, and paste the new code into a new file”

        • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          We literally have both and our new Tech Lead is absolutely terrified that I can deploy shit into prod right from my command line. I think it’s hilarious (because yeah, it’s total shit, but our Dear Leader was a complete muppet who refused to listen and prioritise doing things right, so here we still are). Also our GitLab is the free licence because why pay for the thing that takes care of our entire codebase, eh ? 👌

        • tooclose104@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I’m at one of the latter, so I feel this in my bones. I’ve watched what should have been an innocent config change snowball into a pair of VM clusters shitting back and forth for 2 hours. Implemented strict change control that day. Kind of a pain, but the team learned a lot that day!

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Do it and I destroy your backend.

    Have you dropping tables like you’re Mankind in 1999.

  • Sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Alright, I need all of the leads on this call to confirm: go, or no go.”

    “Go.”

    “Go.”

    “Let 'er rip!”

    “Hold up–”

  • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Anyone else find that praying hands emoji very condescending when used like that? I would destroy the backend DB if they tried to send me that!