How dense can a company be? Or more likely how intentionally deceptive.
No, Eaton. We don’t need to “improve model reliability”, we need to stop relying on models full stop.
How dense can a company be? Or more likely how intentionally deceptive.
No, Eaton. We don’t need to “improve model reliability”, we need to stop relying on models full stop.
Sure. That’s what I’m doubting. That’s what they’re talking about. That’s the hype.
Sorry, sir (or madam), you doubt math? Are you saying you don’t even believe mean value has a bigger chance of matching what you expect? Well that’s fine.
I think you’re missing sarcasm for insanity, and the reason that you’re doing that is that you were already belittling their viewpoint quite fiercely, rejecting absolutely everything they said just because you disagree with their conclusion.
“Everything they said”? Ha. The OP literally just said “I doubt it” without any reasoning. It sounds to me that they are the ones who reject everything other people said, and blindly believe in their instinct: “Yeah. I don’t believe science.”
Call it belittling. I probably won’t say it out loud, but I absolutely laugh at these kind of people silently, who don’t care to take a look at facts and theories.
You’re so insightful and wise. You have learned much from other viewpoints.