The more the overlap, the rounder the diagram.

The so-called-left here will be out with bullshit reasons why we shouldn’t vote for Democrats in the midterms and then immediately pivot to how Democrats never get any legislation passed. It’s fucking idiocy in full force.

So true. I thought they’d give it a rest when Kamala took over the campaign, but then it was all about how Kamala was equal to Biden all along.

When I saw this obvious and very simply and strongly true meme, I thought “I bet the comments will be full of the most aggregious tankie crap about how the Democrats are 100% the same as the Republicans” and I was not wrong.

And the US has demonstrated time and time again that it has the manpower and the infrastructure to rebound quickly under strong, competent leadership.

A lot of the manpower has been sacked. Replacing those people and getting them to a point of strong competency will take years and years and a lot of money.

Did Biden ever have a majority in both houses? I know Obama had it for the first two years and that’s how he got Obamacare through. Neither of them had SCOTUS stacked in their favour and ruling them immune from their own intervention.

Biden wasn’t typically referred to as a progressive.

Your heart’s not really in it any more, is it? You’re not even trying to win the argument at all, you’re just trying to get the last word.

It’s just links to imgur at this end.

I don’t think you’re very good at spotting when I’m being facetious and when I’m making a serious point. Let’s try again.

Hahahahahahahaha powerstruggle can’t even tell the difference been TEN and TWO!

Your diagrams overlap a lot and it’s a lie to say that you have disentangled the real chart when you have ignored and omitted details that don’t fit with your oversimplified untestable pseudoscience.

Too true. Scared dogs bark a lot. Confident dogs accept and welcome.

It will never cease to amaze me how much even ostensibly left wing Americans give the Republicans a free pass to be as awful as they like and not get criticised at all.

I understand that using reason, logic, truth and sense to debate with you was a waste of time and that we continue to disagree about sex. You claim there are only two sexes yet you are unable to demonstrate that on the real chart and you are unable to see that your eleven charts would be tangled up if you drew them as one diagram with one node each for each set of chromosomes, but there I go, talking logic to a bigoted troll who wouldn’t admit they were wrong under any circumstances whatsoever, because truth matters to them less than “winning”.

Did you own the libs again, powerstruggle? Did all the little red downvotes on the rest of the conversation prove you were winning your little war against the libs?

No, they blocked the UK because they we threatened with a fine for selling children’s browsing habits (that they themselves had tagged as children). Rather than simply filter out the children they geoblocked the whole country. This was before the porn registration legislation came into effect, but they like people to think it’s that because that sounds like they’re heroes rather than creeps. Imgur corporate thanks you for continuing to spread this disinformation.

“Content not available in your region”. Do you have an open access link from something less corporate?

I understand that you’re unable to use your definition to untangle the real chart. It’s OK, I knew that you wouldn’t be able to, and I also knew that you wouldn’t be able to admit that you can’t, because I also know that you want to win more than you want to be right. You’re quite happy to be wrong as long as you’re winning.

One day you may realise that truth and people are more important than winning, but that day is definitely not going to be today, and definitely won’t be written about using the powerstruggle account. Do you think that Charlie kirk realised that his loyalty to winning arguments was misplaced as he was dying, or do you think he died happy for a cause he believed in - the right to bear arms no matter the consequences?

By right wingers typically, yes.

I think I explained that one pretty well.

Did you understand that anyone who actually knows something about it also knows that sex is more complicated than you claim? Did you understand that you’re being a complete arse to trans people? Wait, yes, you knew that one. That was the deliberate part.

I was being sarcastic. Secretly I think you’re far, far more stupid than you begin to realise, because everyone who tries to explain what science or scientific method or scientific consensus means has wasted their breath because you’d rather cling to and defend daddy trump’s pseudoscience than learn amything. It’s willful ignorance and maybe the only cure is when trump’s goons kidnap someone you actually care about in real life that you might begin to question him in any meaningful way.

You’re so clever, repeating stuff like you do while ignoring the truth of what you reply to. I really respect that.

What the fuck are finding hard about “same thing at the top of several of them” that made you think they were disentangled? If I made maps where only one underground line was on each map it would in no way prove that the lines aren’t tangled in real life! Are you completely stupid or is it an act for the purpose of trolling more?

Given that we disagree about the meaning of the word sex and your charts use your definition, why on earth would it be meaningful for you to slap the word male and female on ten diargams that appear unconnected in only the most stupid and superficial sense that they’re in separate images, and why the fuck do you think I would fall for such a juvenile ruse?

If your (trump-following) “organised around producing” large gametes or small gametes theory that you’ve been telling everyone about for days and days on end holds water, have one chart, no duplicated nodes, split by gamete size, no tangles, the body is “organised” around the size of the gametes by your own definition, all the primary and secondary sexual characteristics well easily follow the “organisation” you claim is so definitive.

Or admit that your definition is useless.