I’ll tell you why not! You hippie homeopaths are all the same! Science has scienced the evidence that there’s no evidence for homopathic medicines otter than the libido effect.

Just looking though my saved posts, and this is one of them. Thanks again, @Track_Shovel.

Oh, you’re right. Crocs are much, much easier to wash.

See, everyone should plan their sexcapades on lemmy, you get very high quality advice.

Oh, wait, wait, I just thought of something. BRB.

On reflection, I think I’m posting too much in this thread.

I’m not sure what it means. I’ll talk it over with my shrink on Tuesday.

Are you boasting about your phat ass, or is it just such a mighty bubble butt that it would pop anything else that got near it?

Oh shit, that was meant to be a dm.

Never mind. Own it. Own it.

Yeah, I’ve got nothing to be ashamed of… No, no, that’s not always true, post-nut clarity and all that.

Er, we all have needs, and sometimes… No, no, that’s a bit entitled.

A mouth’s a mouth, and what two consenting adults get up to in their garden shed is of no concern to anyone. Yeah.

Just as long as its out of view of the window so Mrs Stephenson next door doesn’t get a bit of a surprise when she weeds the rose bed.

Kind of you to offer. When can you get round?

I mean, it depends, dude, it depends.

I just can’t see it ever happening.

I don’t mean any disrespect, and I don’t want to kink shame, but that kinda thing is just not my bag, baby.

Dude, I don’t mean to boast, but honestly, I think my dick is just WAY too big. Like, I would DESTROY that grape instantly if I tried. It’s not just a trick of the camera angle, it just is that big. Honestly, I don’t even need to get out a measuring tape to tell you that even with a massive grape, it’s just not going to fit.

The grapes? I can never tell when a grape wants some action. My whole life, I’ve missed every single signal. Well, that, or the grapes just don’t find me attractive, like, EVER.

Probably get ants though.

You have saved me from all kinds of trouble with your sensible warnings. I did not think this through well enough.

If I might trouble you further, o wise one, how about up against the shed wall, each in a pair of welly boots, standing in a paddling pool half full of water?

I… I don’t think I can.

The real life pro tip is always in the comments.

What about missionary, though?

Thanks for explaining more. I feel like I blundered about a bit in the topic, but you graciously took the time to share your perspective with me and I got a window into another life. In the sea of memes and politics, there was a little nugget of human reality that I got to share in. Thank you. I hope you have a long and very happy life.

You think voting third party and allowing the fascists to take over America is leftist?!

Actually, no, you know it isn’t, because you’re just lying to win the election for your guy trump who promised to send the military on leftists. You never address that, somehow the topic always turns to your favourite topic: why leftists should abstain from choosing the president.

Your voter purity argument is a sham. You think that indirectly causing the fascists to win absolves you of responsibly for them winning. It doesn’t.

If there were an easy way of transperimenting, you might give it a go, but you’d definitely want to go back afterwards. That makes sense. Perhaps you could call it 1st choice cis? Not-transperiment-averse is too much of a mouthful.

You’re only pretending to care about Gaza, just like you’re pretending to be a leftist. If you really were a leftist you would care about the oncoming fascism, you would care about replacing McCarthyism with military execution of leftists. You claim to care so much about pushing the democratic party left, but everything you advocate encourages them to move right.

…and fuck them up badly, in many ways, and in more than one country. Yes.

…gish gallop…

…too much for you to handle?..

At no point have you made a coherent argument based on them, though.

Don’t switch your criticisms mid stream.

No, this is exactly the same criticism! It’s exactly the gish galloper’s technique - make a series of nonsense claims, firing salvo after salvo of nonsense into the argument. There’s no point me engaging with any of your other claims until you accept that you were talking nonsense with the first. We don’t have a basis for discussion unless we agree what counts as sane or rational points to make from data. I think that any points that require one non-democrat to be three republicans can’t possibly have merit, and for a fleeting moment I thought you had accepted that your argument on that specific point was erroneous, but I just now read that you don’t recant that assertion at all. Why would I engage with other data if you can’t agree that that didn’t make sense?