• kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    So people looking at this photograph actually can perceive this to be white and gold? thats utterly wild. And hard to believe.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    It appears white/gold to me on it’s own, I’ve never been able to see anything different.

    Grabbing this specific image and sampling the colours though; they appear more of a grey/brown colour. I can sorta maybe understand blue, but definitely not black.

    This is just using Polish photo editor on android:

  • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ok is this post some sort of trick? I opened up lemmy, saw it white and gold for the first time in my life, then I took a shower, now it is blue and black once more.

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    Literally the entire planet remembers this. Even people who were not born yet.

  • weariedfae@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve only ever seen it as blue and black. I can’t force it the other way like I could with Laurel and Yani. Y’all seeing white and gold astound me.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    When that was going around I saw it as black and blue, and my partner at the time saw it as white and gold. When it was revealed that it was actually the former, I made a comment something like “I guess the difference is I see things as they actually are”, which got me a sharp look. :)

  • frida@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    whats next? are you gonna post who remembers yanny/laurel? bitch be fr

  • Grool The Demon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I never really understood the debate. In reality, if you were standing in front of the dress it is black and blue. Now, if you take a digital photo of the dress and post it on the internet as a terribly compressed jpg, with weird white balancing, and brightness/contrast turned up and down it is gold and white. The debate isn’t really about the reality of the color of the dress but the reality of a badly edited photo.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        What always confused me is, the picture clearly seems to be overexposed, which means the blue/black interpretation should be obvious.

        • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          I agree. But my wife was so firmly in the white/gold camp that I had to find this (and a better image of the actual dress, which is indeed blue and black) to help us understand one another’s perspective.

        • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s because we’re also very used to seeing photographs of a subject in shade while the background is in full sunlight. If you take a picture of a white and gold dress in the shadow of a patio, with the background all fully lit by bright sunlight, the actual pixels representing white objects in the shade would be that bluish gray tint.

          The problem here is that the dress isn’t in the shade but those of us who see white and gold simply assume that it is in shade, while black/blue viewers (correctly) assume that it is under the same lighting conditions of the overexposed background.

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            This thread has been helpful for understanding how others could see it as white and gold; I never realized people were actually seeing it as in shadow even given the context of the rest of the picture.

      • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Properly calibrated screen for graphic design here, multiple mobile devices. Never any major variance unless it’s a different image.

    • GooberEar@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      if you take a digital photo of the [ … thing … ] and post it on the internet as a terribly compressed jpg

      That sums up the entirety of the content on a number of popular subs on the R-word site.

      Confusing perspective? No. More like confusing JPEG artifacts.

      • Final Remix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        You used to be able to report shit for not being confusing, but it was placebo at best. That site sucks so much.

  • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Just asked my kids (Not around for the first time). One says blue and black/gray and the other said purple and green/gray. I’ve never known anyone who actually saw it as white and gold. Only heard that people do.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    It kills me that no matter what, it is always white and gold for me, EVEN THOUGH REALITY SAYS OTHERWISE!