• AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      13 hours ago

      She’s not just saying that the wealthy are trying to seize control — she also discusses how they’re leveraging the rhetoric of inevitable AI in order to build the foundations for future control. Significantly, she identifies this attempt as being driven by anxiety that the wealthy feel about their future control, and discusses strategies for resisting that.

      What she’s saying is far from obvious; I’ve seen so many anti-AI, anti-capitalist folk unwittingly perpetuating the rhetorical agenda of the wealthy by accepting the notion that a society ran by super advanced AI is inevitable.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah I call bullshit on that.

        Automation is inevitable, doesn’t mean decision making will be.

        Having fully automated factory that churns out 100 cars a day is not dystopian if you can have people able to configure that number.

        The dystopian part is having only a few with “admin access”.

        • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Call bullshit on what, sorry? I’m not clear on whether you’re calling bullshit on the professor in the article, or the wealthy assholes who the professor is critiquing

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The wealthy feel anxiety about their future control? Why would they need to feel that?

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Because they ran out of things to distract the masses, plus they need the plebs in order to maintain their little fiefdoms.