• Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    In a post on LinkedIn, The Gardening.club, the AI division of The Sweetshop, the studio behind the ad, said the ad took them “seven intense weeks” to create. They even admitted “the man-hours poured into this film were more than a traditional production.”

    Melanie Bridge, CEO of The Sweetshop, shared similar comments in a post on Instagram, saying, “The hours that went into this job far exceeded a traditional shoot. Ten people, five weeks, full-time. Blood, sweat, tears, and an honestly ridiculous amount of coaxing to get the models to behave and to honor the creative brief shot by shot.”

    So why not a traditional shoot? Especially for a multibillion corporation, this money gets used in 5 minutes of operation for the CEO private jet, literally pocket change

    • JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      So why not a traditional shoot?

      they heard how much publicity coca cola got when they did their AI ad andthere’s no such thing as bad publicity? i can’t even say that it doesn’t work, it does get people talking about it…

  • duncan_bayne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The studio behind it says they ‘hardly slept’ for several weeks

    Are they acknowledging that crunches and sleep deprivation lead to poor results? 😀

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The studio behind it says they ‘hardly slept’ for several weeks while writing AI prompts and refining the shots — ‘AI didn’t make this film. We did’

    You really shouldn’t be so eager to take credit for that monstrosity.

  • X@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Yeah, that was fucking atrocious, but given they’re Drowsy Don’s fave, I don’t patronize them anymore. Still an abysmal ad.

    • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Solidarity. Haven’t eaten there since September 2024. Besides essentially endorsing Trump, the food is absolutely not worth the exorbitant prices they charge.

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I mean, as far as I know they’re not exactly touting that fact. If they just say “whatever, here’s your damn cheeseburger” that’s not really much reason to boycott IMO.

      Now, Shake Shack switching to beef tallow for their fries and practically worshipping RFK… They can suck one. Which is a shame, because I’d actually like to try that if it were just a thing they did.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Don’t forget that McDonald’s ran two separate PR campaigns for the Trump regime.

        And THAT is plenty of reason to boycott them. Don’t give those traitors another cent. There are a TON of other options to get that greasy junk food fix.

  • BossDj@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So did Coke and McDonald’s do this because the reporting hits more people than the ad does alone?

  • thagoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Not everyone is fond of Christmas. It’s not universally loved. I hated Christmas for close to 10 years after my mom died and before my son was born. This is a perfectly normal reaction to the holidays. That being said, should you spend your holiday hiding time at McDonalds? Absolutely fucking not.

    I did find the video amusing, even if it’s made entirely of Ai bullshit.