This might belong in some circlejerk sub, but I think it’s somewhat clever. Basically, if AI datacenters get shut down, the power that would’ve been used to generate AI slop could be used for magnificent things. I mean, it’s purely clean energy because instead of using gas or oil, you take energy that COULD be used for something useless and put it to better use. Think of all the applications.

  • We could power countless electric cars, trains, and bikes.
  • We could power countless medical devices like pacemakers and defibrillators.
  • We could power countless lights in people’s homes.

All this could be accomplished by not building massive datacenters. What’s more is that there could be countless gallons of clean drinking water used for surgical cleaning and chemistry that would otherwise serve to cool the amount of datacenter power. Think of all the possibilities!

If only Sam Altman could understand this…!

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Man this comm upvotes really weird shit sometimes. Not doing something isn’t a “power source;” you’re just allocating energy from one use to another, which is probably a good idea in this case but still.

    • ethaver@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Some people don’t realize that letting AI live rent-free in their heads like this is just another way of wanking to the idea of it.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Alternative cost” is well established in economic theory. Because of the rules of supply and demand, the price equilibrium would shift down as available supply increases.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It has all the same practical effects as creating new power, so “not doing something” actually is the same as a “power source.” It has everything to do with what you said.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Mathematically, sure, but in real world terms no. For example you can’t go to a developing country and set up not-using-AI power plants. Even if we assume that’s the case, though, supply and demand also entails that reduced demand will lead to reduced supply, so the implication by the OP that this newly available power will just flood the market and be used for whatever as free energy is false; the only thing that would happen is, at best, somewhat lower electricity prices.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              If those countries were using AI then not using it would effectively create power. The same would be true if you went there, built the power plants, used it for AI, and then shut the AI down.