Send me bad puns. Good puns welcome too.

  • 32 Posts
  • 7.56K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2024

help-circle










  • Maybe stop meddling in European politics, sowing division, and funding the invariably Trump aligned far right.

    Why would they do that? Helping the European far right lead the West to its doom is a frankly brilliant play by Russia and crew. They can withstand more aggressive Western foreign policy longer than Western liberal democracies can survive with Nazis at the helm.








  • TIL that different Fediverse clients have different character limits. Now I’m starting to feel like my 5000-character limit is a scam.

    The long-term, the economy gets fucked, but the short-term, the aristocratic family’s balance books look fantastic.

    I wonder why this sounds familiar. Must be the wind. That aside thanks for the excellent write up. I’m kinda starting to get Romaboos.


  • So I’ve got a few questions if you don’t mind.

    the structure of the economy meant that a significant amount of benefit still reached the exploited poor, peasants and urban laborers alike.

    Can you explain how exactly that worked? How would an average Roman peasant benefit from Roman conquests or trade?

    Coloni were not nearly as productive as previous agricultural systems, for the obvious reason that they benefitted very little from their work.

    If they were less productive, then why did the aristocracy accept this system? Or did the ability to exploit their coloni more make up the difference? Did this make them meaningfully richer?

    More generally, from what I understood it seems the Western Empire went through a cycle of giving more power to the aristocracy and everything getting worse. Was this avoidable or would it be accurate to think of the late Western Empire as an anachronism giving more and more power over to the aristocracy in to temporarily sustain itself until it eventually collapsed? Why did this happen in the West while the East managed to survive?