• NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Who told you we don’t ? It’s normal to worry about what your offspring will become… when you love and care for your child more than for your ego of course.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    What if they want to be a lady? The world’s richest cunt already went off the deep end over that one.

  • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    As someone who was almost kidnapped by a woam at the age of 7 I am getting a bit tired if people acting like this sort of shit is only carried out by men.

    • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah, and more than that, I think that people just don’t bring it up much because they all feel there has to be such a low chance that their little angel and bundle of joy could possibly turn out so poorly

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh no, my son’s gay! Why, oh why, couldn’t he have been a child molester instead?

      Yeah, this meme is completely idiotic, lol.

          • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Sure it is. Its obvious what its implying even if its left with some plausible deniability.

            I hate this weak minded shit where people don’t just say what they mean for fear of criticism, and so they just leave a convenient motte to retreat behind.

            • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              Do you expect every meme to be backed up with demographic data? Or are you just prickly that someone suggested that homophobia exists and you need to argue about something?

              Motte and Bailey. Lol. Get a grip.

              • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Do you expect every meme to be backed up with demographic data?

                If we just go hog wild with “its just a meme” we end up with the far right. Thats a huge part of how they latched onto the social common ground for white men online.

                “It’s just a meme!” for generalizing large groups of people is shitty, particularly when it seems many believe the implied demographic level of popularity of said meme.

                Your “Lol. Get a grip.” in response to this is anti thought.

    • copd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m absolutely certain more people fear their kids being those things over homosexual.

      so this meme is literally asking for more people to be homophobic

      garbage meme

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I think they may be more horrified finding out their children become those things, but I don’t think they actively fear that possibility in advance. Contrast with the gay scenario where a fair number of parents actively fear that possibility well in advance of any signs that might even be a thing.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Even if it were backwards the post would be asking for people to care less about the first stuff, since you’re saying they don’t care that much about having gay sons. The level of homophobia does not change and the post is wouldn’t be asking for that in any valid interpretation.

        Reading comprehension isn’t that hard, dude.

        • Seleni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          This post is turning into an impromptu reading comprehension test for a lot of people it seems

  • teslasaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    They would. Without religion being fed from birth.

    I’m seeing a pretty grim trend in the metal community, where old opponents of organized religion suddenly have become religious.

    When the singer of WASP(we are satans people) and Iced earth (vocal opponent of Christianity and the cruelty of religious leaders) all of a sudden are born again christians, i start to get worried. The second also got arrested during 6th jan…

      • teslasaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Don’t single out one of them. By that logic, islam is the religion of Arab supremacy.

        There is definitely stronger links between religion and white supremacy in the us. But us is not even half of the Christians in the world. Most of which are black och hispanic.

        • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          This isn’t about singling anyone out. islam isnt relevant to this conversation about fascist white supremacist christians overtaking the us government.

          • teslasaur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Yes, but thats not “christianity”. Do you see what i mean?

            And i mean that in no way to defend Christianity, i detest those institutions of backward thinking. All of them. Equally.

            • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I really well and truly do not care for no true scottsman arguments. Some christians are horrible people. They’re still christian even if they’re hypocrites, because every religious person inherently is because no one could possibly follow every single one of their rules, and in fact in many instances the rules themselves demand people pick and choose.

              • teslasaur@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                17 hours ago

                But you where completely fine in making that argument when it came to islam. Why is that? Other than the likely fact that you come the US and have a different relationship with that religion.

                I think you missed the point of my post. I’m talking about people that absolutely are not racist, they are some of the few in society that stood up to religious norms in a time when they where ostrasized for it. They where simply against religion and fought against it. I want them to fight the powers that be again.

                Kind of like some of the Iranian guys that fled here after being arrested for wearing metal shirts in Teheran. They still have warrants out for 14 year old sentences. But they still play and they are on the right side of things.

                • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  But you where completely fine in making that argument when it came to islam. Why is that?

                  This just literally makes no sense. You are so stuck with the initial irrelevant strawman you made that you’ve latched on to believing Im making some random argument that hasn’t been made and continues to be irrelevant because we are currently talking about the white supremacy takeover in the US, where christianity is the religion they’ve picked.

                  The groups you mentioned, the point of my post, most likely changed to christianity as they want to align with what white supremacy has choosen as the white supremacy religion.

                  Your example with arab supremacy makes no sense, because there is no arab supremacy in the US making islam their religion.

                  Its whataboutism where there isnt even the subject of the whatabout.

                  I’m talking about people that absolutely are not racist, they are some of the few in society that stood up to religious norms in a time when they where ostrasized for it. They where simply against religion and fought against it. I want them to fight the powers that be again.

                  If they arent racist, why the switch to religion? I truly don’t get what you’re trying to get at.

  • spirinolas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t think I know a single person, male or female, who’d rather their son be a pedophile or a rapist instead of gay…

    • DarthFreyr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can’t imagine a person who would excuse getting someone so drunk they no longer refuse sex as “boys will be boys” behavior or similar nonsense, but would express actual disapproval of their child entering a same-sex relationship? It doesn’t just mean “convicted of assaulting a young white woman at gunpoint”.

          • spirinolas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            What is your point? I never said anything about friends. I made a simple assertion that, for some reason, seemed to bother you.

            • DarthFreyr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              If you are limiting your statement to people you personally know, then it’s not responding to the statement in the image, so why would we assume that was your intended interpretation? If you are stating that you can imagine a person like I described exists, but no real person could possibly match that description, you are talking nonsense. If you are merely stating your personal ignorance of other people, then congratulations, weird flex but educate yourself.

              Since you don’t know, it would be bothersome to normal people if someone says something about the world (as they interpret that statement, as mentioned) that is untrue, or if they perceive someone to be making efforts to detract from good-faith conversation. Perhaps that alleviates your uncertainty about the reason.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are tens of millions of people in the states making excuses for rapists and creeps while demanding the rights be stripped from gay people.

      The biggest probably is that they don’t consider half of those things to be real problems and will do as much mental gymnastics as possible to get away from that. A adult fucks a minor but marries them and suddenly it’s “love” and ok by them and they don’t ever need to think any harder about it. They can rage against pedophilia to their hearts content because to them those things are not the same but if a dude dresses better than shit and likes to draw they’ll bust out “GAY” as an insult.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Neither do I, but I do have the barest ability to understand that my personal experience is not everyone’s experience.

          • phx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Yeah I’m also not in the States but I’m seeing an increase of people who support the folks who would likely try the same evil shit here because of stuff like “they’ll deal with the queers”.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The key difference between being gay and one of those things: Power. The ability to trample other peoples lives is the highest morality one can possess.

    At least, in the eyes of horrible people.

  • glorkon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I do not fear my son being gay in the slightest. I only want him to be happy. Also, if he happens to be gay or trans, what with the current climate in society and all the hate coming from the right… it’s when he would need me as a supportive dad the most.

  • Flickerby@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s SO much of all of those in the Bible I imagine they feel more comfortable writing that off as a “little whoopsie” but GOOD LORD if you’re gay that’s a direct reflection on my failure as a parent, how could I ever show up to the annual pot luck dinner knowing my child made me look bad?

  • Meron35@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    The monkey’s paw curls, and people fear their children being gay, because they think gay people are groomers/rapists/pedophiles.

    No /s, because this is an actual basis for people hating on trans people, drag queens, and gay people

  • s@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    as much as

    She wants an equal amount of fear between those?

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      that’s… certainly one way to interpret that saying. it’s more like… “the thing you currently fear? i wish you’d put that energy into what you should actually fear”

      • s@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I understood the intent. I just thought it was poorly phrased (and that it potentially could have been satirical bait).

      • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t think parents should really be afraid of either. Parents have enough scaremongering aimed at them as is. “What if my kid turns out to be a pedophile?” isn’t actually a helpful thought that’s likely to encourage good parenting.

    • DarthFreyr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Equating the desired fear of the former to the present fear of the gay (in some people). I also infer the desired fear of gay sons should be equal to present fear of the former or, better yet, none.

      • s@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        How much effort did you put into convincing yourself that I was saying that in earnest?

  • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    Shit, I’m just worrying they’ll be fucking idiots. I’ll be a happy dad if they’re just good dudes, you know?

  • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Thing is, its easy to teach your kid not to do those things, but you cant teach them not to be gay. No reason to be afraid of it, but its definitely understandable that you would have more concerns over things that are beyond your control than things that are.