• Qwel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Better text to speech and speech to text, automatic image descriptions, better translations.

      ChatGPT and the likes can also be used to access content without ads nor license

      Also you can write the letters “AI” on a paper and rich people will give you money. They’ll want it back eventually but hey

    • lapping6596@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Coderabbit for PR reviews at work has both impressed me and made me aggregated by how incorrect some of the comments are. It’s like, it’s caught bugs that i would have missed even when looking very closely but also makes the same suggestions to over complicate chunks or suggestions that literally don’t work. Such as assuming the db schema when looking at a query and saying “that’s not what the column is called”.

      So, that’s best I’ve experienced really, basically a PR check that’s able to find some really out there bugs but a lot of comments need to be ignored.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think Adobe’s new generative fill is supposed to be pretty good? It’s just a more complicated version of their much older content-aware fill.

      • Evotech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        It works well for small programs and boilerplate. But you need to know what you are doing to guide it. They can very often get stuck in some rabbithole

        • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I concur, it has gotten me in multiple wild goose chases when debugging. It is extremely confident especially when it’s wrong

          It’s pretty good at fleshing out documentation. and if you’re naming variables properly it’s pretty good at gleaning what you’re trying to do and autocomplete on a small scale.

          • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            It is extremely confident especially when it’s wrong

            This reminded me of a recent study I saw posted about the accuracy of AI and trying to remove hallucinations. One of the conclusions of which being, besides that it’s impossible to stop them from hallucinating, that the tests companies use to grade the quality of an AI and the expectations of users grade confidence in an answer higher than the accuracy of the answer.

        • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ll be honest, it’s probably wasted more time than it’s saved me. I only trust it to format files and find where things might be used in the code base. So, you know, plain-language pretty print and grep.