• Sabin10@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Good faith debate made me laugh, the dude was literally in the middle of moving the goal posts when gukrackk

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Any of Charlie’s ideas that were tested through good-faith debate never survived. He and many others of his kind tend to avoid that kind of discussion.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    i’m not using the death of a white supremacist to make kissy faces at fucking people who spent the last four years calling for the death of trans people.

    also fucking glad i blocked gavin on bsky

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      59
      ·
      10 hours ago

      He was often called a white supremecist in debates and always challenged people to tell him what he had ever said that reflected that, and no one ever had an answer. He was a lot of things, but I don’t really think he was that. Do you have an answer? If he was, I would want to know, fuck racists.

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Culture has nothing to do with White Supremecy or any other form of racism or “scientific racism”. We can indeed have good and bad cultures; this being entirely subjective to individual opinions. Cultures are a social outcome, not a genetic one.

          People can “define white Supremecy” however they like, though it’s already well defined, so their personal definition may be confusing or discredit any other views they may share.

          I don’t think Charlie Kirk was a white supremecist at all, but there’s many different ways of being a total cunt. At a certain point of cuntiness, it really doesn’t matter if he was one or not.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            their personal definition may be confusing or discredit any other views they may share.

            I don’t think Charlie Kirk was a white supremecist at all

            Delusional, discredited.

          • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            This is literally how dog whistles work, my friend. They don’t say what they’re saying, out loud. They hide it behind a veneer of rationality, that they think prevents certain people from hearing what they’re saying, while throwing a giant wink at the people that “get it”.

            When a white supremacist talks about “Western culture being superior to other cultures”…they are talking about “white culture”.

            • saltesc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              Yeah, but people that aren’t white supremecist also say that. White supremecist from non-westrrn cultures say the same of their culture instead. White supremecist enjoy and emerse themselves into other cultures without it impacting their position of being genetically superior.

              What you’re trying to explain is called cultural chauvinism and it’s as related/unrelated to many other things as it is/isn’t to racial ideologies.

              No dog whistles here, just already very established and understood stuff.

              Plus, it’s White Supremecy here. There’s so much already there to work with. There’s no need to apply assumptions onto it and sell it as a new package.

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                people that aren’t white supremecist also say that

                Nope. Simply not true.

                White supremecist from non-westrrn cultures say the same of their culture instead

                Which would indicate that it IS about white supremacy rather than culture. You’re negating your own stupid point.

                cultural chauvinism

                You’re REALLY reaching, buddy…

                it’s as related/unrelated to many other things as it is/isn’t to racial ideologies.

                🙄

                No dog whistles here, just already very established and understood stuff

                Fixed it for you.

                • saltesc@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Cultural chauvinism is the belief that one’s own culture is superior to others, often leading to prejudice against different cultural groups. This concept is commonly discussed in the context of international relations and communication, highlighting how such attitudes can affect interactions between nations and ethnicities.

                  A subset of…

                  Chauvinism is the unreasonable belief in the superiority or dominance of one’s own group or people, who are seen as strong and virtuous, while others are considered weak, unworthy, or inferior The Encyclopaedia Britannica describes it as a form of “excessive and unreasonable” patriotism and nationalism, a fervent faith in national excellence and glory.

                  Which is not the same as…

                  White supremacy is the belief that white people are superior to those of other races.The belief favors the maintenance and defense of any power and privilege held by white people. White supremacy has roots in the now-discredited doctrine of scientific racism and was a key justification for European colonialism.

                  Here you go… https://www.routledge.com/Cultural-Chauvinism-Intercultural-Communication-and-the-Politics-of-Superiority/Ibelema/p/book/9780367710033

                  You would also do well to pay attention to the events of Daryl Davis.

                  On top of books and many studies on this, there’s also documentaries and reports if your attention span so needs this.

                  Or, you know, it’s all bullshit and you know best!

                  A sponge is wet. The ocean is wet. Therefore sponges are oceans. And saltesc is dumb.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            It has nothing to do with culture but they hate multiculturalism… Use that heavy thing above your shoulders bud.

            • saltesc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              That’s not true at all. Some do, plenty don’t. Multiculturalism is unrelated.

                • saltesc@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  What’s your point?

                  It’s okay to redefine what White Supremecy is just so we get to call someone one?

                  This is cultural chauvinism or cultural imperialism; it is not white supremecy or any racial superiority ideology for that matter. These are two different, well-defined, and bad things. You don’t have to try force them together to make a bad thing. It’s already done. You win. Being either one or both is bad.

                  But it’s not exactly good to shift the goal posts to try frame a person you didn not like into being something you want them to be but cannot confirm that they were. That’s my point.

    • I_Clean_Here@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      You know he’s baiting right? Or are you this dense. Everything he mentions is the opposite of what Kirk did.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Don’t give him the Trump treatment and rationalize his words in a way that are more acceptable to you. Words in general, but especially from politicians, should be taken at face value without an obvious reason to do otherwise. Newsom gives no indication here that he means anything other than what he’s literally saying.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, he’s dog whistling. Anyone tuning in who never heard of the guy sees the governer making a pretty stock response to an assassination of a political adversary. Anyone who knows what is going on knows it’s tongue in cheek

  • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    “Continue his work”…

    I almost hate liberals more than open fascists. At least they admit they want to kill you rather than just casually enabling it in the name of some twisted and perverse form of civility. Republicans want you in death camps, democrats want them to file the right paperwork first.

    • KnitWit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Was it? Gavin had him on his podcast, I don’t think this was a dig. And while the lemmy jokes may be funny, I wouldn’t want any politician making light of any shooting. He should have just said nothing.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Y’all gonna shit yourselves when he runs the table on the primaries.

    You could organize now - maybe work out a name and some cool election swag? Or . . . Really any effort at all in promoting a person would be good. Lines are open, call now!