• echo@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Uh… it’s already over. The Fascist Fuck sitting in the POTUS seat has already been trying to tell you this…

    In any case, even in a non-rigged election, Newsom would get trashed just like Clinton.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Clinton barely lost, mostly because idiots proclaimed that there was no point in voting because the system was already beyond repair.

      • mathemachristian [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Sounds like she sucked at making people believe she would make a difference, which given this is killary “we came we saw he died” KKKlinton who’s husband is behind the “tough on crime” bill that is largely responsible for the size of the current prison inmate population in seppoland is completely understandable. Get better candidates or stop being surprised why no one would show up to vote for you.

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Wild that your argument hinges on Trump being the better candidate, as slightly more people showed up for him (in specific states).

          • mathemachristian [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            How? His strategy wasn’t based on motivating minorities to vote for him but Hillary’s was. He appealed to the racists and won, and she tried to make the case that she would improve things and failed.

            • Zorque@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Well your argument seems to be that people will show up for a better candidate, and people showed up for him.

              Ergo, you think he was the better candidate.

              Unless of course your argument is basically you refuse to participate unless everyone else fixes everything for you, so you dont actually have do anything difficult to make things better yourself.

              If you wait for perfection to happen without you, it will never come. You have to fight for something better. Sometimes that means settling for something that’s not good enough yet so that things can get better later.

              • mathemachristian [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                Unless of course your argument is basically you refuse to participate unless everyone else fixes everything for you, so you dont actually have do anything difficult to make things better yourself.

                I dont get why everyone assumes this? I’m not in Seppoland but will always advocate for organizing with the PSL or DSA. That’s how NYC got Mamdani in position. Unless of course your argument is basically you refuse to do anything unless everyone else fixes everything for you, so you can then just vote for it.

                Sometimes that means settling for something that’s not good enough yet so that things can get better later.

                I mean thats basically your strat right? Keep voting for these candidates, Killary, Genocide Joe, Bomber Harris, now it looks like it could be gruesome newsom, until somehow, magically a good candidate that will fix everything comes along.