• VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Kind of crazy because South Park wasn’t super relevant for years. Yeah, South Park still gets views and attention. But after all this, South Park is back in the forefront.

  • arsCynic@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 days ago

    God I love Matt Stone and Trey Parker. Been watching South Park since I was a kid and they haven’t stopped delivering.
    Their Trump mockery went stratospheric at the end which caused me to jump around the living room in sheer exhilaration.
    South Park - s27e01 - Trump Epstein

    • T0RB1T@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      A warning first would have been nice before that ended up on my phone in the work lunch room :/

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    After their season long “both sides” trump/clinton fuckery in 2016, best I can do is a slow clap.

    • A7thStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      They had the chance to show how ridiculous trump was back then; when it might have made a difference with their “libertarian” fanbase. Instead they softballed any criticism of him. They showed who they really are, fuck em.

      • Ilandar@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        They had the chance to show how ridiculous trump was back then

        ???

        Trump has always been obviously ridiculous. You guys need to get over this idea that the people voting for him are going to have some magical come-to-Jesus moment and join the rest of us in reality after watching an episode of South Park or reading a non-“sanewashed” news article.

        • A7thStone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t expect anyone to have a come to Jesus moment. I did expect comedians who claim to hate both sides to actually act like it, rather than treat ASN obvious idiot with kid gloves when it actually mattered. Matt and Trey showed they are just Republicans who are to embarrassed to admit it with their entire 2016 election season.

          • Ilandar@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            when it actually mattered

            It never mattered. It’s a comedy show, no one was going to change their vote based on it. How can you still not get it after two election wins and political influence spanning a decade?

            • A7thStone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              It did actually matter. Anyone who doesn’t realize that pop culture shapes peoples opinions is either lying to themselves or an idiot.

              • some_random_nick@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 days ago

                In all honesty, is there any overlap between people who watch South Park and those who voted Trump? I can’t imagine that there are more than a handful.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      139
      ·
      3 days ago

      Clinton was avidly pro the US going to full blown war with Iran.

      Compared to Clinton, Trump has shown restraint in foreign policy.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          67
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Which is undeniably bad, but nowhere close to what Clinton had envisioned. Clinton wanted more of a second Iraq invasion style war and occupation for Iran.

          • Malek061@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            59
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            The whole coulda, woulda, shoulda, doesn’t work. Trump declared war and bombed Iran. Its not the same.

            • Saleh@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              49
              ·
              3 days ago

              By this logic you could also not claim that Clinton or Biden would not have done something Trump did, or had done something better instead.

              Or we accept that consistent positions and behaviors of politicians can be extrapolated to hypothetical situations.

              • yuri@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                29
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                you’re the only one extrapolating to hypotheticals. declaring something is bad doesn’t require you also provide/support some perfect alternative.

                they just said trump actually did the thing you believe clinton would’ve done. y’know, hypothetically. hence why you were hit with the “shoulda woulda coulda”

              • Malek061@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                22
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Negotiated the non proliferation agreement with Iran under Obama. Does that count?

          • Senal@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Are you sure you want to use “Publicly stated positions and intentions” as a metric to defend trump ?

            i mean, you could, it just seems like you might not have thought that all the way through.

      • kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        What part of unilaterally bombing a nuclear facility in a country historically hostile to the US is restraint?

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          39
          ·
          3 days ago

          Compared to a full blown invasion, boots on the ground, two decades of occupation it is.

          I am not saying that Trump has shown restraint. He only has shown restraint relative to Clinton

            • Saleh@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              In her primary race against Obama:

              https://www.reuters.com/article/economy/clinton-says-us-could-totally-obliterate-iran-idUSN22243327/

              “I want the Iranians to know that if I’m the president, we will attack Iran,” Clinton said in an interview on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

              “In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them,” she said.

              “That’s a terrible thing to say but those people who run Iran need to understand that because that perhaps will deter them from doing something that would be reckless, foolish and tragic,” Clinton said.

              Her vote in support of invading Iraq followed the typical lies at the time:

              https://awpc.cattcenter.iastate.edu/2017/03/09/hillary-clinton-iraq-war-vote-speech-oct-10-2002/

              “In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort and sanctuary to terrorists including Al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security. This is a very difficult vote. This is probably the hardest decision I’ve ever had to make. Any vote that might lead to war should it be hard, but I cast it with conviction.”

              • Skavau@piefed.socialOPM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                29
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                WASHINGTON, April 22 (Reuters) - Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton warned Tehran on Tuesday that if she were president, the United States could “totally obliterate” Iran in retaliation for a nuclear strike against Israel.

                On the day of a crucial vote in her nomination battle against fellow Democrat Barack Obama, the New York senator said she wanted Iranians to know what she was prepared to do as president in hopes of deterring an Iranian nuclear attack on Israel.

                “I want the Iranians to know that if I’m the president, we will attack Iran,” Clinton said in an interview on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

                “In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them,” she said.


                Nice omission of context there, pal. Clinton has always had liberal hawk credentials, but I don’t see a realistic circumstance where she would have ever launched a ground invasion of Iran.

                In addition, you’re going back to the 2008 primary there.

                • Saleh@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  You think Netanyahu, who managed to string Trump along to attack Iran, wouldn’t have managed the same with a much more Hawkish Clinton? Israel wants the US to go to war with Iran since quite a while. It would have been much easier to push Clinton to commit to full blown war, than with Trump, who for the most part pulled troops out of the Middle East. Also we saw that Trump, after the bombing immediately wanted the whole thing to be done, claimed huge success and got a ceasefire between Israel and Iran going.

                  It is a low bar to meet, but Clinton would have made sure to drill a tunnel to pass through under it.

  • d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wow, people still watch South Park!? I’m sure they’re still killing it. Just kind of fell off the radar for me.

    • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Im Canadian so once they joined paramount they kinda just vanished here. To be fair they lost my interest with the whole tegridy farms thing that never ended. But them moving to paramount erased South Park off every streaming and tv channel in Canada so you stopped seeing ads, and I sure as hell am not getting paramount plus, that’s enough streaming services

      • BurntWits@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Canadian here, can confirm. I never watched the show myself but I haven’t seen any ads for it in many years (though I also haven’t seen many ads in years in general to be fair). No one talks about it anymore either.

        Also, I agree with your mom, I think you’re cool too :)

      • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        American, and same.

        I only have Hulu and I struggled to find new episodes without finding them on a shady website.

        I’m absolutely not getting Paramount plus. After what they did to Nathan Fielder and removing the Nazi episode, they can go die.

    • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Not really killing it imo. Most episodes are extremely “both sides”-y which makes them have this milquetoast approach to issues and an unclear perspective. The jokes are often kind of cringe, imo, and the whole thing feels very bland. So its like a political/social satire comedy show that is designed by committee to make mild japes at both sides but not make them too uncomfortable.

      It used to be an edgy comedy show (sometimes too edgy for mainstream audiences both then and now) that would lambast social and political figures, but it wasn’t just a satire show - it had a separate identity from that. And it was funny, usually. It pushed a lot of boundaries - the media was always talking about South Park as though it was this super scary show that will turn your kids into hooligans and destroy the moral fiber of the country and should be banned.

      So maybe it’s partly that you can’t easily be a super rebellious standout show pushing the envelope every week for 27 years, that they wanted to appeal to mainstream audiences and adopted this bland centrist viewpoint, and that the media landscape is full of edgy-ish comedy shows these days and so it’s harder to stand out.

      I am by no means a huge SP fan though and have not watched but like 3 seasons since the old days. So if this take is off and the show has gotten more interesting I’d like to know

      • 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        69
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        South Park has always been Right Wing. Trey and Matt are self proclaimed “Libertarians”. There’s a significant overlap in the Venn Diagram of Joe Rogan bros and South Park fans. “They make fun of both sides bro” and yet some of their most enduring cultural contributions are downplaying climate change and dehumanizing trans people.

        They may clutch their pearls about MAGA now, but their promotion of political apathy among Gen X and Millennial men is part of why we have MAGA.

        • kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          3 days ago

          I remember there was a brief moment in the early 00s where the term “South Park Republican” had some cultural cachet until everyone realized it was just edgy libertarianism for contrarian shitheads.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          Aren’t they former libertarians? I feel like I heard they realized they were idiots and changed, but I could be wrong.

          • 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            3 days ago

            Its possible. I recall reading somewhere that they regret the ManBearPig episode. Good on them for being able to change and grow.

            Still, unfortunately the damage has been done.

        • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          downplaying climate change

          i dont remember this one. when was this?

            • Bubbey@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I think Man-Bear-Pig was more satire on people acting like Global Warming and Climate change was an imminent thing that was going to kill them in 10-20 years, treating a nebulous scientific concept into something impendingly dangerous like a car crash or wild animal.

              • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Manbearpig was saying climate change doesnt exist and Al Gore is an idiot. That was the only message. There was no both sides to that episode.

                12 years later they made an apology episode to say Gore was right all along.

            • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              oh i remember. literally just made the connection, the episodes even featured al gore as the alter ego or something.

      • LePoisson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        3 days ago

        Watch the most recent episode. I, like you, don’t really watch South Park anymore but holy shit was it funny.

        The Trump stuff killed it. The callback to Saddam, the absurdity of everything going on, the show really hit the nail on the head of how it feels in America right now.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        3 days ago

        Don’t forget that Al Gore made them sad and they created Manbearpig as a response. It was some decades later that they admitted that they were wrong on the topic of climate change and regretted what they did.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 days ago

        I liked it more in the early days before every episode revolved around current events and people. Like the dodgeball tournament episode, aliens giving anal probes, the kids getting ninja weapons from the fair, or Scott Tinnerman and how he shouldn’t have fucked with Cartman.

    • d00phy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      So, just watched the episode, and it’s about what I remember. Not bad. Kind of hope they make the whole season this. Someone needs to.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      3 days ago

      They don’t do regular seasons anymore, and haven’t for several years. Instead, they will do some special episodes each year on a specific topic. These are more like miniseries than regular episodes and I have enjoyed them.

        • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I liked the Post Covid part 1 and 2 and Joining the Panderverse specials quite a bit. They’re on Paramount + (or your piracy site of choice).

          EDIT: The first episode of season 27 was quite good, too, Finally, after over 8 years, they tore into Trump, daring Paramount to censor them.

    • Bubbey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Generally, the show has moved on from “topic of the week” style shows and more… self-fulfillment for Matt and Trey. Episodes with Warhammer/Red Dead Redemption/Tegridy Farms/putting their kids in episodes. It seems more like they’re just doing whatever they personally like now that they don’t have to worry about money. I feel like this has kind of made narrative structures fall apart since it’s strung together set-pieces of whatever Matt or Trey currently has in mind.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s really all South Park has ever been. They famously typically write the episodes in just a day each, voice them and put them out in under a week.

        Not much time for planning and deep analysis of their plot and subtext - it’s just whatever shit’s been on Matt & Trey’s minds that week.

        There was even a documentary about it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6_Days_to_Air

      • Microw@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m still watching it in the same place where I’ve always watched it 🏴‍☠️

    • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      The very first sentence of the article…

      South Park kicked off its 27th season on Wednesday after a hiatus of almost two and a half years

    • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Its about as good as it always was. Which is to say that if you matured or grew as a person at all after grade 10 then its probably not for you anymore.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        What a stupid thing to say, the new manbearpig episodes where they admit they were wrong about climate change is some of the best fucking satire

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Interesting hypothesis, but the show has been evolving as the creators age. For example, Randy has been a much more prominent character in recent seasons. They still poke fun at current events, celebrities, and issues though. Recent seasons tend to have more continuity across episodes, too.

        • Bubbey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think part of this too is with Matt-Trey having kids they want to write more for adult characters as they get older

        • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think continuity is more a result of streaming services being more prominent. That seems to be a media-wide trend. Even kids shows are getting more of it. When you didn’t have to rely on the audience running in at a specific time every week to not be lost, you have more flexibility to not resort to the status quo at the end of each episode.

    • Nelots@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean hey, at least they glanced at a thesaurus this time instead of sticking with the old tried and true “SLAMS” or “BLASTS” .

  • burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    3 days ago

    its interesting to go through trey parker and matt stones history in the entertainment industry, where at one point they were underdogs fighting censorship, but really they were doing right wing propaganda the entire time, sometimes on accident but usually on purpose. like, how often was the villain of a South Park episode a woman, a liberal celebrity, or an environmentalist? and how about all the episodes about trans people? i also recall Cartman in early episodes getting karmic retribution inflicted upon him for his literal nazi rhetoric, but at some point he now just gets his way and actually his bigotry is justified since all black people can play bass and all Jews really do have a secret pouch of gold.

    also, in the Team America movie, which is supposedly a satirical comedy about american interventionism being bad, they end the movie by saying ACTUALLY america SHOULD be the world police, and they kill all the annoying hollywood actors who are all brain dead traitors that support North Korea nuking everyone.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think South Park is right-wing propaganda, just vapid enlightened centrism.

      At worst, maybe they ripped into Bush-era conservatives enough that the alt-right found themselves in agreement, but got the entirely wrong takeaway from it.

      It’s just is one of those series where pretending to be stupid or establishing icons/memes will encourage other stupid people to interpret it however they want. Cartman acts like an evil Nazi but fat kid funny so Nazis funny and cool I guess.

      • Bubbey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        The entire purpose and joke of modern Cartman is that he is a shitty person that is now completely surrounded by shitty people. As a result, he no longer feels special now that everyone in America is a terminally online racist/sexist psycho.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Of all the brain dead shit I expect to read online south park being right wing propaganda was not my list of ever happening, props to you my dude for making that fucking leap in logic.

      Also I have no idea where you got that Cartman just gets his way now, we must be watching different versions.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        “South Park conservative” is a term from like 20 years ago. They’ve been doing the “both sides are the same” shit since the very beginning and really took it to the next level during the first Trump administration by almost completely punting on the issue and instead doing a bunch of “anti-woke” story lines.

        And I say this as someone who was a religious fan since the very beginning. Matt and Trey are not the liberal heroes some people seem to believe they are.

        • Ilandar@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 days ago

          Matt and Trey are not the liberal heroes some people seem to believe they are.

          I know Americans only see the world in binaries but there is a lot more to politics than “liberal vs conservative”. The views of the creators clearly sit outside of that dichotomy, and they reference and mock their own political disengagement in this episode.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I have no idea where you got that they did anti-woke storylines during the first trump presidency, I am looking back at the episodes and don’t see any being about that, they are also excellent satirists and there is shit to satirize on “both sides”, but you know the world doesn’t work in the US’s two party system.

          I also don’t think “south park conservative” is any meaningful argument, they are media illiterate to a higher extent than more left leaning people, they didn’t even know Rage against the Machine is not fitting for a conservative rally and when taken at face value rather than as a satire south park may seem as right wing lots of times.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Sir, this is Lemmy. You must be this pure (reaches really high) to enter.

        There is no villainous satire of women, liberal celebrities, environmentalists, transphobes, or over-the-top outcomes allowed here.

      • burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        i think i laid out how the show runs with right wing propaganda pretty clearly. maybe its not explicitly a conservative production, since the creators like drugs and occasionally take a leftist position (usually when to not do so would be denying objective fucking reality, like climate change and Amazon being anti-union). but even so, to me it is just too apparent how much South Park punches straight down with unrepentant glee, and im saying this as someone who watched the show a lot and enjoyed it consistently.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I am sorry, but if you talk about punching down, you are talking about utter woke nonsense and I say that as a Guillotine supporting leftist.

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        south park is absolutely right wing propaganda.

        matt and trey are republicans, by their own admission. they “both sides” a ton of issues. they normalize and defend using slurs when they could get the same point across without them.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          I also normalize using slurs, losing retarded and removed is a damn shame, there are plenty of fucking retards out there not to mention the fucking removeds and I am not talking about people with mental illness or gays.

          Look at that retarded removed US president they have over there, what are you gonna call him if not that?

          • Ilandar@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Retard is a “slur” that should definitely be normalised, and indeed it was until a group of virtual-signalling losers decided it was very offensive again and tried to cancel anyone who used it. It stopped being used in relation to the intellectually disabled a long, long time ago and was just another generic insult for decades. Ironically, it is the people who complain about it today who are actually the ones giving the word power - if they had just shut the fuck up it would have continued to fade into irrelevance.

            • Bubbey@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s funny because they tried to change “retarded” to “special needs” because people were using it as an insult. Now people call others “special needs” as an insult. There is no world where people don’t use an adjective to describe mentally impaired people as an insult. Seems kind of pointless to try to police speech around it.

              • Ilandar@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                This episode basically commented on that phenomenon. Cartman loses the joy of living because there are no more “woke” people left for him to laugh at. I wish more people on the left understood that by constantly trying to control what everyone else is doing they are just creating things for the right to “resist” against. If people want to use a word in a context completely divorced from its original intent, just let them do it.

                • Bubbey@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  It’s also been studied that the more we pay attention to race in society, the more likely people are to be racially discriminatory. Whether it’s positive or negative, having race shoved into every aspect of our lives and every political dialogue is not healthy.

          • Noxy@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            I didn’t insult you, it’d be awesome if you could reciprocate that courtesy

    • Almost always South Parks villains are portrayed in a heavily satirized way. A common thing they do is to portray those attacking eg an environmentalist as ‘normal’, but then overly exaggerate how ‘true’ the attacks are. It’s to ridicule the attackers, not who they attack, by showing just how ridiculous this villain has to be for the attacks to make sense.

    • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think they’re just good at keeping it real and both sides have stupid ideas/ideals and they should get called on them.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I dunno, the stereotypes (blacks playing bass, jews having secret gold) being true thing is really egregious. The way they satirized Trump’s first election is when I really stopped watching South Park because it showed they don’t actually keep it real and just insult everyone and everything like they claim. If that’s truly the best they could do with that whole trainwreck of a human being then they have lost their talent.

        • Ilandar@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          The way they satirized Trump’s first election is when I really stopped watching South Park because it showed they don’t actually keep it real and just insult everyone and everything like they claim. If that’s truly the best they could do with that whole trainwreck of a human being then they have lost their talent.

          So did you watch the latest episode or…?

      • MehBlah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        Trey Parker despise atheists

        Nah, they do however recognize that a atheist can be just as full of shit as a theist. That south park arc where they seem to make fun of athiest wasn’t doing anything of the sort. They were making fun of people and their beliefs. That even in a world where everyone is a athiest. People can still find something to fight about. If they would have made those episodes about any theist faith it would have just looked like things are today.

  • oplkill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    i hope next episodes will be real fun, instead that self repeating boring episode

    • Nelots@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      What a weird thing to take issue with. Even if you were right, at worst they would’ve made a single typo by missing one space or hyphen. The horror!

      But you’re not even right. Monthslong is an actual word.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        This account makes so many nitpicky and/or wrong grammar “corrections” on here that I actually recognize the username. Grammar nazis really piss me off, because it’s mostly about feeling superior and it’s often rooted in classism or racism, even if unconsciously. I should know, I used to be like that when I was a kid.