• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Assuming what you’re describing works (and i have no particular reason to doubt, beyond the generally poor reputation of AI), that’s a different beast than “lol i fired all the copywriters, artists, and support staff so I, the owner, could keep more profits for myself!”. Or, “I didn’t pay attention in English 101 and don’t know how to write, so I’ll have expensive auto suggest do it for me”

    • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      that’s a different beast

      I think what was being implied though was that the original poster was saying that any use or talk of AI by a company immediately invalidates it, regardless of there being any specific traits like firing workers present. (e.g. “Using AI” was the only prerequisite they mentioned)

      So it seems like, based on the original wording, if they saw a hospital going “we use top of the line AI to identify tumors and respiratory diseases early” they would just disregard that hospital entirely, without actually caring how the AI works, is implemented, or affects the employment of the other people working there, even though it’s wholly beneficial.

      At least, that’s just my reading of it though.