Vice President Kamala Harris on Friday called on the federal government to move “as quickly as possible” to change the way it officially classifies marijuana, saying that “nobody should have to go to jail for smoking weed.”

“I cannot emphasize enough that they need to get to it as quickly as possible,” Harris said. “We need to have a resolution based on their findings and their assessment. This issue is stark when one considers the fact that on the schedule currently, marijuana is considered as dangerous as heroin ― as dangerous as heroin ― and more dangerous than fentanyl, which is absurd, not to mention patently unfair.”

Marijuana is currently listed as a Schedule 1 drug by the Drug Enforcement Administration. That classification designates it one of the most dangerous drugs possible, with no medicinal uses. Other substances in the same category include heroin, ecstasy and LSD. Marijuana advocates have been pushing for years for the federal government to either reschedule marijuana to a different category or deschedule it entirely.

  • zigmus64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    What do you mean? This is standard political fare… most of the population has the memory of a goldfish, so popular shit like this always waits until the election cycle.

    Additionally, an executive order, or changing the chief of the DEA, are probably the least effective ways to handle it. All it would take is a republican administration to undo it all. The way that sticks best is legislation.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Your boat is leaking.

      Do you either bail out the water, or try to get into port so you can fix it.

      Or maybe, you do both. Biden can reschedule…. Today. He could have done it 3.5 years ago.

      He hasn’t. He probably won’t.

      You’re right that legislation is a more permanent fix. No question there. Doesn’t mean you don’t work the other, faster, solution to get something good enough for the time being done.

          • june@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Following tue legal framework to get this done is slow footing it? Are you aware it’s in the final stage before getting rescheduled?

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Claiming that slow walking it is following some fictional legal framework is just an excuse for slow walking it.

              I’m not buying any bullshit about it being the final anything.

              If you want me to treat it as anything more than a filthy lie, democrats should have been taking their campaign promises more seriously.

              Let me guess. We’re in the final stage of passing the public option, the minimum wage increase, codifying roe, and closing gitmo as well. I’m sure we’re in the final stage of passing BBB and reforming our out of control police too.

              After decades of lies, you expect me to buy that Democrats are telling the truth about wanting to do the right thing?

              What unmitigated hogwash.

              • june@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Fictional legal framework? Lmao

                Go read up on the CSA hon.

                The decision is resting with the DEA now, who are the decision makers.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  So quote it. Quote the law that is preventing Biden from descheduling cannabis.

                  Not a press release, not an op-ed, the actual law.

                  Chuck Schumer was saying Biden should deschedule back in January. He knows more about the process than you do.

                  EDIT: and just like that, the condescension and the excuses for prolonging the racist drug war stop.

      • zigmus64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I’m not convinced they’d even try passing the legislation once some executive order was issued. It would be touted as a victory for the Biden Administration, and then forgotten about until 2028…

        God damnit, when did I become so cynical?

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You’ve seen the world we live in.

          Cynicism is just a prudent reaction to reality.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      most of the population has the memory of a goldfish, so popular shit like this always waits until the election cycle.

      Stupid uninformed people…

      Most of them vote R or not at all.

      But neoliberals refuse to acknowledge people who aren’t ignorant and do care.

      “Because what are ya gonna do, vote Republican?”

      It doesn’t work.

      Maybe we try helping people? Worst case scenario, Dems actually help people when they’re in office.

      Isn’t that the whole point of electing Dems? Isn’t that better than just stalling the Republicans destruction of our country?

      • zigmus64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I completely agree… but that’s how this shit goes. This is definitely one of the situations where both sides pull the same shenanigans. When was the last time you heard Kamala Harris open her mouth? Granted, she’s been busy in a divided Senate, but Dan Quayle was more visibly present during the elder Bush’s administration than Kamala has been during Biden’s. Now she crawls out of the Senate chambers to talk about cannabis? Better late than never I guess.

        It’s not like Biden’s administration hasn’t been doing anything useful. But these wildly popular policy initiatives that would do a lot of good often wait for politically convenient moments when it’ll be fresh in the electorate’s memory.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Which is the exact danger of running neoliberals that only care about being elected.

          The only thing making this “how shit goes” is both parties get money from the same donors who don’t want anything fixed.

          It’s not like how the sun sets everyday and there’s nothing we can do.

          So telling people “that’s the way she goes” isn’t helping and is only hurting turnout.

          • zigmus64@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Ok… so how do we run people genuinely interested in fixing it? How do we make this not how shit goes? I can’t argue that it’s really disheartening, but the idea that any party is going to run anyone primarily interested in anything other than getting reelected is absurd. The National Committees for each party would never give them a platform. Running third party is suicide here.

            The real change that needs to happen is election reform to provide more transparent campaign financing and moving away from a First Past the Post voting system. That’s how you get people in who can actually fix the issues we have in a constructive and positive manner. It won’t be perfect but it would be helpful. Then we’d have a flourishing of different political parties emerge and voters would have actual choice.

            “That’s the way she goes” shouldn’t hurt turnout. The reality is we’re facing the single greatest threat to the basic ideals of the American Republican Democracy. Bigger things are afoot than cannabis policy. I’ll take this political grandstanding from the Biden administration 10 times out of 10 than one more day of a Trump administration.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              All of those are good ideas to fix it, but we can’t make those changes with the system as broken as it is.

              I think the biggest thing to help turnout would be acknowledging that nothing is going to get done, and that we want a government that just makes nice noises since we clearly can’t get one that actually works. Like you said: You’d take this sort of grandstanding over Trump any day.

              It’s like a mechanic putting in some Sea Foam cleaner to get rid of the knock over doing a full engine rebuild, which we can’t afford. Yeah, it’s gonna break down eventually but at least you don’t have to deal with the noise. It’ll break down eventually, but for now you can at least hear NPR.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Ok… so how do we run people genuinely interested in fixing it? How do we make this not how shit goes?

              Undo citizens united would be a great first step…

              Something that the majority of Dem voters agree with.

              Without those donations and the obligations they come with, neoliberals would stop winning primary elections, and the ones still in office would stop having a reason to oppose progress.

              I didn’t read anything else you typed after that, because if you didn’t understand that already, I don’t see how anything else you could have said was in any way relevant