• callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Can everyone see my screen? Okay good. I put literal paragraphs of stuff into my presentation, and I’m going to read it all to you verbatim. This is much better than email.

    Now I can put presentation skills on my resume.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m the first person to say “this meeting should’ve been an email”, but often it’s because I’m slated as “required” on something I’d otherwise be a Cc on.

      The reason for those, though, is because people don’t read their emails. Especially not the long winded verbose ones that actually explain things.

      You want to tell people things, put it in an email. If you want them to understand it, call a meeting.

  • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m 28 and have no idea what a slide deck is. Is that somehow the new term for a PowerPoint presentation?

    • dankm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ironically, it’s a very old term for a powerpoint presentation. Presentations used to be done with actual photographic slides in a projector. They were stored in a deck of slides.

      I only know this from Mad Men.

    • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hijacking this because you’re top comment and everyone is talking about the origin of the term (the thing you load into a projector back in the days of physical slides), but no one’s answering the actual question as intended:

      “Slide Deck” is the term used for the series of slides shown during a presentation, but “Presentation” refers to the whole performance, including non-slide elements like speeches and demos

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Perhaps it’s geography which is missing from this conversation.

      SF Bay Area techies will say slide deck all the time.

      • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Someday, my friends, presentations made and saved in Markdown will be king, and we can forget about opening slow programs to edit them.


        Yes, somehow the world will be a better place when everything is a plaintext document. At least that’s how I imagine it.


        Incidentally, there was a cool python program for presenting pdfs I used years ago. I wonder if it or similar are still in vogue somewhere.

  • Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Slide deck” is an old person term, not a young person term.

    If anything calling it a slide deck makes you sound old.

      • Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s like calling your remote a “clicker”. A term that is still used but only by the old crowd.

        • solarbabies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Both “clicker” and “slide deck” made a resurgence, these are definitely not exclusively old terms.

          • Fudoshin ️🏳️‍🌈@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Everything is cyclical. My mum took the piss out of my baggy jeans in the early 00s cos they looked like 70s bell bottoms.

            Skinny jeans replaced them but hey ho - baggy jeans are coming back again!

          • Coreidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Their origin is old is the point. They refer back to an old technology and no longer applies since todays remotes don’t click. I think a “resurgence” is going a bit far.

      • Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        For sure especially anything related to technological advancements.

        Slide deck refers to the old film projectors, which no one uses anymore except old people. So of course youngsters will have zero clue what a slide deck is. There is no use for this term anymore and it’s dying along with its technology.

    • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      A slide deck is the analogue version of a PowerPoint.

      The deck is the rotating ring that you drop your slides into, then project them on the wall with what is essentially just an overhead projector designed to take small vertical slides of film loaded into the deck, instead of just using transparent sheets.

      You’d design all your little film slides, arrange them in order in the deck (think, deck of cards). The deck is what let you automatically swap between slides by pressing the remote to rotate the deck and reveal the next slide to the projector lens.

      I’m 32 but my school was broke as fuck so we were still using overheads and slide decks in 2005.

        • Swarfega@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Oh man I’ve not seen one of these since I was a kid. I can literally hear this photo.

      • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m 50 and grew up with slide presentations and I’ve never used the term slide deck. Maybe I’ve heard it? but it doesn’t really hit home at all.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m a little younger, and still remember slides and transparencies and all that, and I’ve heard “slide deck” a bunch in recent years, AND it still sounds so alien and wrong to me!

          I think calling each page a “slide” sounds better somehow, like “hey Bob can you send me that powerpoint slide with the pie chart?”

          • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeah I use the word slide that way. I’m rejecting slide deck as a term. We have to remember veto power when it comes to language.

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    As opposed to being like, 60 instead? Cuz that’s the demographic I’d think of as using the term “slide deck”.

  • waz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    My wife is at the stage in her career where this is relevant. When thinking back about the phrasing she uses, when making content for someone else to present she commonly says “I need to finish making these slides”. When she is putting together content for her to present herself, she says “I need to finish making this presentation”.

    All that said to say, I feel like the terms are related, not the same.

    Just my two cents.

  • guyrocket@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Edward Tufte, of Information is Beautiful fame, generally advises AGAINST using PowerPoint for presentations largely because of the low information density. Powerpoint, generally, forces you to put a LOW amount of information on the screen which can really be a problem in some situations.

    His advice: Create a Word doc and give that as a handout.

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I asked a Zoomer to send me a PPT and he didn’t know what I was talking about.

  • 30p87@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Accidentally called it a power point and not an open document presentation (the n00bs in my class don’t know the difference between Keynote, PowerPoint and Impress)

      • 30p87@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I had to, because the school basically forced us to use iPads and not any other tablets or laptops. And those don’t have OpenOffice, and Apples apps are crap. So M$ Office it was. Now I can use my Laptop, and I felt dirty starting wine on it because it polluted my nice Arch (btw) home and cmd is so much worse than bash.

    • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s only a true power point if it was grown in the Power Point region of North America. Otherwise it’s just a sparkling digital slide show.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Okay, so are we among 80 year olds who still can’t computer, or are we among 20 year olds who either don’t use Microsoft Office or are trying to stop using Microsoft branding for the concept of presentations?

    • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m a 32 year old teacher and I want an overhead projector.

      A dry erase transparency is much easier to write on than the white board. My macro handwriting is awful, students can barely read what I write on the board. So I always end up writing on a peice of paper on my desk, and I have my phone on a tripod so I can get a “top down shot” of me writing on the paper, then I screen cast that to the smart board.

      It works, I can write legibly by writing in a normal size, and then enlarge it for the class to read fairly quickly… Once all the cameras and casting is set up.

      But it would be so much easier to just have an overhead projector, a few transparencies and a dry erase marker. Roll it out, plug it in, aim and focus the lens, then I’m done. Plus then if the internet goes out I could still use the board!

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I bet it would be every bit as good as you think. I had a math teacher back in middle school ~30 years ago who taught EVERY lesson by talking as he wrote things on a transparency on the overhead projector.

        We have great tech for that stuff now, but the projector and markers feels very human-compatible in an analog way. Kind of like reading a book I guess.

        • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I still find it funny how some technological ‘upgrades’ just don’t do things as well as older tech. In university I had a touch screen laptop with a pen - the finger touch wasn’t as good as now (pressure I think, rather than capacitative, and none of the fancy tricks like two finger) but the pen just worked great for me for writing. When touch screens became fashion for laptops for a while that sounded great… but they couldn’t at all do the job I lost in my stylus-input Toshiba. And, as a Toshiba, it was decent generally as a not too expensive laptop.

          I was lucky that about the time I got it, Linux support was coming out for Wacom tablets. (Which is what was integrated in the screen, I guess.) Incidentally, Xournal turned out way better than any of the programs I had on Windows for writing/drawing and for annotating PDFs. Including Microsoft Office’s “One-somethingorother” (I forget the name now.) The Office one was so unexpectedly clunky, and also less powerful. Ah, shame I don’t have much use for Xournal these days with no pen input screen. …Oh, except every time I have to fill in a pdf form, if it’s not set up or not set up right. Xournal is more clunky for that task than I’d hope from a pdf annotator, but it just works when other things don’t.

          … Sorry, nostalgic rant over.