

Are we back to saying SJW? Did they finally get tired of woke?


Are we back to saying SJW? Did they finally get tired of woke?


Don't worry old boy, it won't apply to them
Right-o, carry on then


But it says it’s the world’s best, so no need to worry about what shitty brands do
/s
I thought they were lollipops, albeit oddly shaped


Forgot, never intended to, a little of both maybe, who fucking knows

“I feared for my life”, if they can use it to justify murdering humans they’ll absolutely allow it as a defense to pulling a gun on a bird
Economy Protection Agency
OR
Environmental Profiteering Agency

How much are they paying you Gavin?!



Fuck cancer, but it gets a pass for this one
Sure, cat takes a bite out of every cookie it’s adorable, but when I do it I’m “an asshole” and “need to learn self-control” and “that’s not how QA works”
I can’t put it into words good, but I think the basic idea is that they’re poor, they’ll vote for social assistance programs, only Democrats give lip service to offering such programs, therefore they essentially have no choice but to vote for Democrats to access such programs. These chuds don’t like when poor people vote for their own interests, and obviously they can’t offer such programs to try to win such votes because… reasons?
Said exactly what I was thinking and more, bravo


and also still have the same genocide happening, plus even more acts of war to boot


Did someone print this out and leave it in the sun before linking it here?


Instead of a memoir, why not make it “fictional”? Change the names, slap on a boilerplate “any resemblance to actual persons or events is coincidental” disclaimer, call it a day.
IANAL, not legal advice, etc.


Fucking hell we’re back to this shit? This is the worst Lemmy meme by far, I’d rather someone bring back the moths, or the beans, or the moths with beans in their mouths and when they bark they shoot beans at you out of their mouths

Someone’s been watching The Good Place


a weird american thing that I’ve experienced but, marriage to your first cousin is not illegal here
you’ve what now?
You could maybe argue that ‘in the loop’ implies that someone else in the loop has knowingly informed you of the loop’s contents, hence bringing you ‘in the loop’, whereas you could be aware of the loop’s contents without being intentionally informed, such as if a high ranking military official accidentally added you to a group chat you weren’t supposed to know about.
Admittedly that’s pretty iffy, and maybe there’s not really a humorous way to convey that they want to be aware of things without others knowing what they know or being expected to act on said information.
The salsa?