fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoMad Scientistsmander.xyzimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up131arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up131arrow-down1imageMad Scientistsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square26fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareMBM@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoNo love for the mad theorists huh? The mad philosophers, linguists, mathematicians, …
minus-squareMareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThey are already mad. Have you met mathematicians?
minus-squareshneancy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI would also go mad if I had to accept that 83 is a prime number but 1 isn’t
minus-squareWugmeister@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYeah, 1 is a very strange number, but have you heard of 0?
minus-squareshneancy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agowhat i’m mad about is that you can divide by infinity and get zero, but you can’t divide by 0 and get infinity. make up your minds maths people
minus-squarealsimoneau@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoOh you totally can (as long as you’re working with implied limits, which you have to if infinity is in the mix), you just have to specify if it’s a positive or negative zero.
minus-squareshneancy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agopositive or negative nothing 💀 right
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoi mean, implicitly it’s just whether you’re approaching zero from positive or negative direction, since we’re working with limits. Like you can shave down a stick however much you want, you can never reach 0 stick by doing so.
minus-squareRozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoMad linguists are just prescriptivists.
minus-squaregandalf_der_12te@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agowell, not only. There’s also those that try to reconstruct the original language.
No love for the mad theorists huh? The mad philosophers, linguists, mathematicians, …
They are already mad. Have you met mathematicians?
I would also go mad if I had to accept that 83 is a prime number but 1 isn’t
Yeah, 1 is a very strange number, but have you heard of 0?
what i’m mad about is that you can divide by infinity and get zero, but you can’t divide by 0 and get infinity. make up your minds maths people
Oh you totally can (as long as you’re working with implied limits, which you have to if infinity is in the mix), you just have to specify if it’s a positive or negative zero.
positive or negative nothing 💀 right
i mean, implicitly it’s just whether you’re approaching zero from positive or negative direction, since we’re working with limits.
Like you can shave down a stick however much you want, you can never reach 0 stick by doing so.
Mad linguists are just prescriptivists.
well, not only. There’s also those that try to reconstruct the original language.