Excuse me, this is fox news. Brown people don’t count here.

No, I think the premise of the joke is bad. Its this “Things used to be better” attitude which is completely wrong. It’s guided by weird nostalgia and old movies, that show idealized rich white people.

This is the whole basis MAGA runs on. A bunch of misinformation based on a few cherry picked stats.

“One salary to support a family of 4” (to keep women in the kitchen) is still possible for well educated upper middle-class people, you just have to do the appropriate cuts to lifestyle.

“One million was actually a lot of money.” Yea, that’s how inflation works. Did you not take economics in highschool and learned why that isn’t a bad thing?

Ah, yes. Apartheid and slavery came after Regan and Same-sex marriage in several states came before.

People watched too many movies where everyone had a house and family. This is all upper class POV. This hasn’t changed. You can still do that, if your dad gets you a high position in his company.

No, but its own citizens and putting them in concentration camps.

Lmao, you think ICE cares about passports, they are probably fake anyway.

It’s time to get out of the country. Treat the US as radioactive as China or Russia.

Ok, idk where they get their data. Driving 4 miles generates on average 1.6kg of CO2 (src). Which is roughly equal to 2kWh oft energy, if we use coal, one of the dirtiest sources (src).

After my calculation, the internet uses 0.17kWh per GB of traffic (src) (800kWh•10e9)÷(4.7GB•10e12).

Now a 30min episode in 4k is maybe 2GB if the compression is unlucky. So about 0.34kWh

Your TV probably takes 50-200W which for 30min is 0.025-0.1kWh.

So after my crude calculation, it’s ~1.6kg of CO2 for driving and ~0.4kg of CO2 for 30min Netflix, if we only use coal. Solar, Wind and Nuclear reduce that number drastically.

I don’t think its a good source for any of these, because its short videos. You don’t actually look for information there, because searching for specific these specific videos is hard. If you want specific information you gotta read, because text-based info is searchable.

Recipes are on recipe websites, interesting places in local forums, same with rare languages. Tutorials are all over the internet.

Protest are definetly not on the Chinese run social media, unless China wants it to be amplified.

It’s maybe good for memes.

This is cope. TT feeds you the information you don’t need or search for it. If you search you will find better sources for everything. It’s just a big advertisement platform.

Also tf is manifestation footage?

Among cis men it’s gear, roids, kreatine etc. Probably a lot of the same for trans men.

I mean Maduro is pretty bad. If that statement was just about him, I don’t see the issue. They seemed to quite dislike everything Trump was doing.

The most confusing part about that statement was Americans seeing what the Nobel prize is. They especially should stfu after electing that shit-show XD

What? What are either of these things really? I’m so confused.

You don’t even need any humanitarian arguments.

The birthrates are below replacement, if we want to keep our standards of living we need migrants or we’ll run out of workers.

I mean we can raise the productivity of the average worker with tech, but I don’t think its fast enough to compensate for the shrinking population.

I mean, let’s see what the court says, but I don’t think this is a clear cut case.

New tactic for Ukraine dropped: Build Trump statues in likely drone paths. Once one goes down you’ll have his support.

This reminds me of the worldseed webnovel cover

To maintain/gain weight? Why else?

You shouldn’t do it regularly, but I think its better than a 1000 calorie deficit.

You are loosing it

Yea, not a good food source, but if you use it, you don’t have to get fat.

If you have no time to cook, do mealprep, or if you have the money buy premade meals.

You are like 25 years behind the science. There is a difference in absorption, but its negligible. Your digestion is incredibly efficient at absorbing calories. Unless you have some weird condition, you can count calories 1:1 and ignore the rounding error of absorption.

This calorimeter talking point has been debunked for a long time now.