While we can be pretty confident that Reddit has its own motivations (i.e. self-interest) for fighting these lawsuits, this is still a good news story for pirates.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    215
    ·
    10 months ago

    Food for thought: Lemmy instance admins probably can’t afford $800 an hour corporate attorneys to fight off subpoenas.

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      84
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Food for though: In the US judges have ruled on multiple occasions that an IP address doesn’t actually prove what individual engaged in the act.

      • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        76
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Might I direct you to the huge flaming catastrophe of bullshit known as “the police don’t give a fuck lol”. All they need to do is make it difficult, costly and time consuming to win and fuck you once you get hit with charges. And would you look at that, the US legal system specializes in all 3 of those! How convenient.

        • dtc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Police can arrest you, but they don’t run the courts.

          Ie you get brought in on bogus charges and if the only evidence is a number that isn’t admissable as evidence you would likely see a mistrial.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Doesn’t matter, these are unpaid volunteers standing up instances. Most, if not all, have no desire to fight that battle on their own dime.

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s why it does matter.

          Even if they get the IP addrsss from an instance, they can’t use it for anything.

            • Deceptichum@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              It kinda does if a judge has decided that an IP address does not identify who the offender was and thus is not enough evidence to bring a case against someone.

              • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I feel like I don’t need to explain to folks around here that companies will lawyer up and basically use the legal system to harass and intimidate regardless if they have standing or not if they think you are small enough to be bullied into stopping a behavior. Which I assure you your average instance admin is.

        • Trollception@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          They sure as hell will find money for an attorney if they are being sued for 10s or 100s of thousands of dollars.

          • fidodo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            They’ll need one but that doesn’t mean they will be able to afford one. The point of these lawsuits is to intimidate, even if they don’t win, if people see lives ruined because of the cost to defend, they’ll be scared into not pirating. This is a fear campaign.

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            The sad reality is no matter how winnable your case is, companies can still bury you for years and consume every free moment of your life and then some. For many people, these court battles become their entire life for several years. It can cost them everything.

      • Kaldo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        And yet they still want them, so there must be more to the story. I also don’t understand why since I have dynamic IP address in EU, unless they can match the ownership to a person at any given time in the past its not useful info.

        • ben_dover@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          they can. your telco provider knows exactly which ip was assigned to whom at any given time

    • Skelectus@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sure, but that’s assuming the logs contain your ip in the first place.

        • Hubi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          10 months ago

          Huh, I exclusively browse Lemmy through a VPN and I’ve never seen that one.

        • Skelectus@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It helps admins help you stay anonymous by relieving them from having to cover for you.

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I am not going to thank the unpaid volunteers who make the fediverse possible by getting them C&D letters/legal threats.

          • Chozo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Not really, though. If they’re ordered to turn over IPs, they’ll turn over IPs. Whether those are legit or VPN IPs is another story, but the burden placed on the instance admin doesn’t really change much.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Oops, I accidentally fired the sd card containing my instance running on my raspberry pie.

      • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        If that is really how you do it, you won’t need to fry it, it will happen soon enough by itself.

        • Cinner@lemmy.worldB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          10 months ago

          Seriously. Lemmy is a house made of patchwork quilt, with a bit of pine sap here and there to steady the few boards.

    • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Would be a real shame if my instance’s logrotate was set to, say, only keep a few days of webserver logs. Real shame.

      Good luck establishing precedent with that!

    • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Oh. They sued an instance? 😱
      Anyway… here’s another 5 hosted in Russia, or a country where piracy is legal, or just don’t give a fuck.

      • t0fr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        ok but what if in losing the suit, they must give up the logs and IPs?

        Before they go under?

        like the instance and the people that discussed piracy will be hurt

        and it will put fear in others

        • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Not all instances keep logs…
          Some intentionally discard them, look into the policys of the instance you’re signing up to.
          All your comments and posts are hosted on your parent instance then shared to the federated instances.
          Some instances don’t even let you sign up with an email or make it optional.
          Lemmy.world keeps logs, but much more controversial instances often don’t.
          Also it’s much more complex, because you have to think about the scope of the potential lawsuit as well as the given evidence that a user is actually sharing the material infringing on their copyright; which will not be a large amount of the user base. They can’t simply sue a user for having an account, the user has to actively be sharing infringing material.

          • ex_06@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            And, to be fair, a gofundme for stuff like this often gets full very fast

            If the community is big enough to get sued it’s also big enough to spread a link for funding, easy

  • Deceptichum@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I was going to download their movies to spite them, but looking it up they’ve only produced complete trash.

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sorry, you’re going to have to be just a little more specific here, I’m wading in a sea of garbage over here

  • Kissaki@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Firms wanted seven years’ worth of IP address logs

    I doubt - or hope they don’t - Reddit stores them for that long?

    • jabjoe@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s data that could have value, so I doubt they don’t store it. I think the movie studios didn’t offer enough. Or Reddit thought it was too damaging for this particular sale.

        • jabjoe@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I always assumed this would happen, so had a second account. Which had a special email address both of which I only used via Tor and private brower mode.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    For real tough, Steve can suck diseased dicks in hell.

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    It was insane to think they would comply with this to begin with. Downloading pirated media isn’t illegal, neither is discussing piracy. What is illegal is redistribution, and good luck proving that on a large scale community like this.

    • Wolf_359@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Careful with this. Downloading pirated content can definitely be illegal depending on where you live.

      It’s just not usually enforced as heavily as redistributing.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        More specifically there is no US Federal Law about obtaining pirated works, only the Redistribution

        17 U.S. Code § 506 - Criminal offenses
        
        (a)Criminal Infringement.—
        (1)In general.—Any person who willfully infringes a copyright shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, if the infringement was committed—
        (A)for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain;
        (B)by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180–day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000; or
        (C)by the distribution of a work being prepared for commercial distribution, by making it available on a computer network accessible to members of the public, if such person knew or should have known that the work was intended for commercial distribution.
        (2)Evidence.—
        For purposes of this subsection, evidence of reproduction or distribution of a copyrighted work, by itself, shall not be sufficient to establish willful infringement of a copyright.
        (3)Definition.—In this subsection, the term “work being prepared for commercial distribution” means—
        (A)a computer program, a musical work, a motion picture or other audiovisual work, or a sound recording, if, at the time of unauthorized distribution—
        (i)the copyright owner has a reasonable expectation of commercial distribution; and
        (ii)the copies or phonorecords of the work have not been commercially distributed; or
        (B)a motion picture, if, at the time of unauthorized distribution, the motion picture—
        (i)has been made available for viewing in a motion picture exhibition facility; and
        (ii)has not been made available in copies for sale to the general public in the United States in a format intended to permit viewing outside a motion picture exhibition facility.
        

        So, basically, downloading cracked adobe products is always right. It’s always morally acceptable. But your provider is risking their ass.

        The big industry names want to make you believe that you’ll be punished for downloading a car. It’s all fearmongering.

        • onion@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes but you commented on a global website, so your previous generalist statement definetly doesn’t apply to everyone reading it :)

            • wick@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              And that’s why they specifically referred to “your previous generalist statement” where you didn’t do that.

              • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Listen, they either reply to the comment they wanted to reply to, or they did it wrong. They replied to the comment that prefaced with a statement about US Law in particular. It should be clear to them that the statement applies to US Law.

          • Banzai51@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Then share your local law. Don’t be pissy that Americans are clarifying for other Americans.

            • wick@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              America is such a small country though, no one would assume anything said online is directed at it’s miniscule population without an explicit reference.

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          The US Media Companies demanding user details from a US Social Media Company is in the USA though. In case that was unclear to some people.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In a motion to compel that was filed last month, movie companies Voltage Holdings and Screen Media Ventures argued that “Reddit users do not have a recognized privacy interest in their IP addresses.”

    But in Wednesday’s ruling, US Magistrate Judge Thomas Hixson said, “The Court finds no reason to believe provision of an IP address is not unmasking subject to First Amendment scrutiny.”

    Voltage Holdings and Screen Media Ventures previously sued the Internet service provider Frontier Communications, alleging that it is liable for its users’ copyright infringement.

    The fact that movie companies only sought IP addresses instead of names this time around wasn’t enough to sway the court.

    As in the previous cases, the movie companies “cannot show that the information they seek here is unavailable from other sources,” Hixson wrote.

    Voltage Holdings and Screen Media Ventures cited Reddit posts in which users say that Frontier didn’t terminate their Internet service despite sending many copyright infringement notices about torrent downloads.


    The original article contains 598 words, the summary contains 160 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!