• chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think the inherit issue is the current “AI” is inherently non-deterministic, so it’s impossible to fix these issues totally. You can feed am AI all the data on how to not sound AI, but you need massive amounts of non-AI writing to reinforce that. With AI being so prevalent nowadays you can’t guarantee a dataset nowadays is AI free, so you get the old “garbage in garbage out” problem that AI companies cannot solve. I still think generative AI has it’s place as a tool, I use it for quick and dirty text manipulation, but it’s being applied to every problem we have like it’s a magic silver bullet. I’m ranting at this point and I’m going to stop here.

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I honestly disagree that it has any use. Being a statistical model with high variance makes it a liability, no matter which task you use it for will produce worse results than a human being and will create new problems that didn’t exist before.

      • chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The high variance is why I only use it for dead simple tasks, e.g. “create and array of US states abbreviations in JavaScript”, otherwise I’m in full agreement with you. If you can’t verify the output is correct the it’s useless.