Damn straight, there are so many laws stating which weapons/accessories are legal AND it does not violate the 2nd amendment, nor does it require a constitutional change.
The 10-year ban was passed by the U.S. Congress on August 25, 1994, and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on September 13, 1994.[1] The ban applied only to weapons manufactured after the date of the ban’s enactment. It expired on September 13, 2004, following its sunset provision. Several constitutional challenges were filed against provisions of the ban, but all were rejected by the courts. There have been multiple attempts to renew the ban, but none have succeeded.
I find myself arguing with my coworkers about this all the time, but I like to sum it up like this.
If there are arms you cannot bare, then the second amendment is not limitless.
So, long guns are responsible for ~4% of gun deaths (including suicides), and “assault weapons” are a subset of that 4%. And your solution is to ban them? Fine. Shave a percentage point off.
But there’s an elephant in the room. Why are we not talking about pistols? Going to need an answer on that one.
Funny note: Any European child can walk in the store and buy a suppressor. Had a German guy tell me on reddit that his gun range requires such devices. Not trying to change the subject, but maybe American gun laws are a bit out of whack? Or, more to the point, racist as fuck.
The assault weapon ban was an example of banning an ‘arm’ legally without it infringing on second amendment rights. Or the example the person I responded to posted, grenade launchers.
I’m not suggesting an ‘assault weapon ban’.
I’m pointing out that just about any ‘arm’ can be made illegal. Hell, check out your local knife laws.
Any discussion of racist gun laws is a whole other discussion, but that discussion should include Governor Ronald Reagan.
Damn straight, there are so many laws stating which weapons/accessories are legal AND it does not violate the 2nd amendment, nor does it require a constitutional change.
Example: Federal Assault Weapons Ban https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban
I find myself arguing with my coworkers about this all the time, but I like to sum it up like this.
If there are arms you cannot bare, then the second amendment is not limitless.
So, long guns are responsible for ~4% of gun deaths (including suicides), and “assault weapons” are a subset of that 4%. And your solution is to ban them? Fine. Shave a percentage point off.
But there’s an elephant in the room. Why are we not talking about pistols? Going to need an answer on that one.
Funny note: Any European child can walk in the store and buy a suppressor. Had a German guy tell me on reddit that his gun range requires such devices. Not trying to change the subject, but maybe American gun laws are a bit out of whack? Or, more to the point, racist as fuck.
The assault weapon ban was an example of banning an ‘arm’ legally without it infringing on second amendment rights. Or the example the person I responded to posted, grenade launchers.
I’m not suggesting an ‘assault weapon ban’.
I’m pointing out that just about any ‘arm’ can be made illegal. Hell, check out your local knife laws.
Any discussion of racist gun laws is a whole other discussion, but that discussion should include Governor Ronald Reagan.