‘But there is a difference between recognising AI use and proving its use. So I tried an experiment. … I received 122 paper submissions. Of those, the Trojan horse easily identified 33 AI-generated papers. I sent these stats to all the students and gave them the opportunity to admit to using AI before they were locked into failing the class. Another 14 outed themselves. In other words, nearly 39% of the submissions were at least partially written by AI.‘

Article archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20251125225915/https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/set-trap-to-catch-students-cheating-ai_uk_691f20d1e4b00ed8a94f4c01

  • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Obviously, the inclusion of Marxism is a decent test, but I have taken samples of things I have written years ago and submitted them to see what it would say about my writing.

    It says a high probability of my writing was done by AI, because I do use emdashes, oxford commas, and other such punctuation.

    We can’t trust anything checking to see if something was written by AI, any more than we can trust something written by AI.

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Anything can be analyzed by a Marxist perspective, which basically just uses a class and imperialism type analysis. If there’s a human society it can be applied.