‘But there is a difference between recognising AI use and proving its use. So I tried an experiment. … I received 122 paper submissions. Of those, the Trojan horse easily identified 33 AI-generated papers. I sent these stats to all the students and gave them the opportunity to admit to using AI before they were locked into failing the class. Another 14 outed themselves. In other words, nearly 39% of the submissions were at least partially written by AI.‘

Article archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20251125225915/https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/set-trap-to-catch-students-cheating-ai_uk_691f20d1e4b00ed8a94f4c01

  • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    No, it was irrelevant to the class

    This is university, not high school or college.

    They should’ve checked it themselves, realised that it was ridiculous and either removed it, or at least asked the prof if that’s supposed to be there.