The simple answer is that these models are already programmed and released, and they simply dont have that check. Its not a matter of whether they should or whether the ai needs to be taken down, because none of that is realistic. Looking at the future, because these models can be run locally, there is absolutely nothing you can do at this point to ensure a future with no fake porn around, regardless of how idealistic you are.
So the solution here is security through noise. There are a number of ways to do that, but they all involve dramatic cultural shift, and im quite curious to see what that entails. The first, and imo least likely, is that everyone stops being weird sexual monkeys and stops stigmatizing the human body. People shouldnt have the power over you that comes with being able to show off your nude body. Thats weird. Seeing the body in an exclusively sexual manner is weird anyways. Sexualing nudity, breast feeding, ankles, all this weird cringe shit that all just seems like barely hidden fetishes that everyone seems to engage in. The human body shouldnt be something to be ashamed of as a concept. I could understand not being proud of your body and not wanting to show it off, but the idea that someone walking around in the nude is inheritely sexual just seems to speak volumes about the people saying that to me.
The second option is to make the models as accessible as possible. The idea being to flood the internet with so much ai slop that it becomes unusable, or everything on it is considered fake. This is a future where you see some horrible accident online, and it is your immediate assumption that it is fake. Kinda like a movie, or a scene from a video game, or most likely some strange advertisement. The default state of the itnernet becomes entertainment, not education or social engagment. The people you match with on tinder are assumed to be bots, the person responding to your comment is likely a bot, the person who posted that cool meme was a bot. The default assumption is that its all fake, for entertainment purposes only. Yes, there are nudes of you floating around. Theres also photos of you on the moon, and getting your ladydick sucked by the president, and of you refracting light to form a trans pride flag. Its all fake, and everyone knows it.
Lastly, we have security through oppression. This is where the government uses this whole thing as an excuse to install ever increasing surveilance software on your devices in order to ensure that youre not engaging with illegal software they had a hand in making. The only way to ensure this porn isnt getting produced? Well, in order to connect to the internet you need to have a goverment issued app that scans every file for signs of ai editing. Whats that? The porn is still being produced? I guess that means its getting brought in from an offline source. We need a worm that embeds itself into every file to target machines that are kept on intranets. You know what, its easier to just take everyones computers away unless theyre government sanctioned. Nanny states are surveilance and police states where effectively open sourced software is concerned.
The simple answer is that these models are already programmed and released, and they simply dont have that check. Its not a matter of whether they should or whether the ai needs to be taken down, because none of that is realistic. Looking at the future, because these models can be run locally, there is absolutely nothing you can do at this point to ensure a future with no fake porn around, regardless of how idealistic you are.
So the solution here is security through noise. There are a number of ways to do that, but they all involve dramatic cultural shift, and im quite curious to see what that entails. The first, and imo least likely, is that everyone stops being weird sexual monkeys and stops stigmatizing the human body. People shouldnt have the power over you that comes with being able to show off your nude body. Thats weird. Seeing the body in an exclusively sexual manner is weird anyways. Sexualing nudity, breast feeding, ankles, all this weird cringe shit that all just seems like barely hidden fetishes that everyone seems to engage in. The human body shouldnt be something to be ashamed of as a concept. I could understand not being proud of your body and not wanting to show it off, but the idea that someone walking around in the nude is inheritely sexual just seems to speak volumes about the people saying that to me.
The second option is to make the models as accessible as possible. The idea being to flood the internet with so much ai slop that it becomes unusable, or everything on it is considered fake. This is a future where you see some horrible accident online, and it is your immediate assumption that it is fake. Kinda like a movie, or a scene from a video game, or most likely some strange advertisement. The default state of the itnernet becomes entertainment, not education or social engagment. The people you match with on tinder are assumed to be bots, the person responding to your comment is likely a bot, the person who posted that cool meme was a bot. The default assumption is that its all fake, for entertainment purposes only. Yes, there are nudes of you floating around. Theres also photos of you on the moon, and getting your ladydick sucked by the president, and of you refracting light to form a trans pride flag. Its all fake, and everyone knows it.
Lastly, we have security through oppression. This is where the government uses this whole thing as an excuse to install ever increasing surveilance software on your devices in order to ensure that youre not engaging with illegal software they had a hand in making. The only way to ensure this porn isnt getting produced? Well, in order to connect to the internet you need to have a goverment issued app that scans every file for signs of ai editing. Whats that? The porn is still being produced? I guess that means its getting brought in from an offline source. We need a worm that embeds itself into every file to target machines that are kept on intranets. You know what, its easier to just take everyones computers away unless theyre government sanctioned. Nanny states are surveilance and police states where effectively open sourced software is concerned.