RockBottom@feddit.org to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 1 day agoYou have one week to opt out or become fodder for LinkedIn AI trainingwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1224arrow-down13file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1221arrow-down1external-linkYou have one week to opt out or become fodder for LinkedIn AI trainingwww.theregister.comRockBottom@feddit.org to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square27fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squarechaogomu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·22 hours agoThat’s still useful data to train on.
minus-squareGreenKnight23@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·18 hours agoI won’t go all “I’ve got nothing to hide so this isn’t a problem” but…this is also within the realm of acceptable use for the product. If I wanted to I’m free to close my account and never return, which I may do yet. resisting AI can be handled in two ways; complaining and continued use, or full rejection of the product/project. IMO full rejection is far more powerful because it impacts the shareholders perception of the product more than just simple complaints.
minus-squarequick_snail@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·20 hours agoWhy is that bad tho? It just means colleagues and potential employers will learn about your qualifications
That’s still useful data to train on.
I won’t go all “I’ve got nothing to hide so this isn’t a problem” but…this is also within the realm of acceptable use for the product.
If I wanted to I’m free to close my account and never return, which I may do yet.
resisting AI can be handled in two ways; complaining and continued use, or full rejection of the product/project.
IMO full rejection is far more powerful because it impacts the shareholders perception of the product more than just simple complaints.
Why is that bad tho? It just means colleagues and potential employers will learn about your qualifications