Basically the title, you need to use the skills you have now and be a productive member of society.

I don’t mean go back and show the wheel or try invent germ theory etc.

For example I’m a mechanic i think I could go back to the late 1800s and still fix and repair engines and steam engines.

Maybe even take that knowledge further back and work on the first industrial machines in the late 1700s but that’s about it.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    29 minutes ago

    I’m a musician, so my skills have always been in demand, although the wages have always been in dispute for as long as there has been music. People love music, they just don’t like to pay for it.

  • YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yikes. I’ve moved from IT tech support to MGMT. I don’t really write with a pen, and largely rely on emails/teams. I think if we went back any further than the late 80s I’d be totally screwed.

  • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Umm, but what if I’m a science teacher? Like, my specialty is history and presentation of science experimentation. The primary limitation is whether I am allowed to bring the tools of my trade (books), which would help me survive in England or Iceland as far back as 900 AD.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Hmm. Before the end of the 19th century you’re going to run into non-standardised/completely bespoke parts problems. How are you on a lathe, or doing blacksmith work? Hot riveting was a separate trade which you wouldn’t have to do, at least.

    I’m kinda obsessed with what I call technological bootstrapping, and so I have useful book knowledge about every step along the way. Doing it in practice is another thing, though; the locals are going to run circles around me unless I can invent stuff. (And even that rule aside, not starving or being “disturbed” while I work on whatever project is a thing)

    So, I think I have to echo the “it’s not going great in 2025” answer.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If I had access to good quality copper, I could invent electricity and do very well for myself.

    So long as I can avoid Ur in the 18th century BC, I could go back pretty far.

  • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’ve been doing computer engineering long enough to do the field in the 80s and still live as comfortably as I do now, if not more so.

    I also sail, with a license old enough that I have my own sextant and reduction tables. I’d assume those skills transfer hundreds of years back, but I wouldn’t like those survivability odds.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If language isn’t an issue I could probably work as an engineer in ancient Egypt or a math teacher in ancient Greece

  • cheers_queers@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Grew up hunting, growing, and preserving a good percent of my food. I might need to brush up on specifics but i think i could do okay if i had social supports for my disability (food providers usually do/did)

  • Getitupinyerstuffin'@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I dont know how my skills might translate. But my ex would find work immediately. I mean, being a whore was a living back then. She could suck and fuck cavemen and probably eat well enough. She would probably try to get double teamed by Neanderthals, because filling 1 hole wasnt enough for her.

  • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    and be a productive member of society

    I just write useless software for a useless company. I’m not a productive member of society today, I wouldn’t be one at any point in the past. 🤷‍♂️

      • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Obviously not.

        There are no microsoft developers these days.

        Only copilot spewing slop.

        That’s why every single update breaks some fundamental feature that had been working for ages.

        And no one can fix it, because they fired everyone who knew anything about how their software works.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    As a software engineer, I’d struggle with the limitations of ten years ago.

    But on the non-work side, I have no problems with maintenance on my house and hand tools haven’t changed much, so at least 80 years

    • YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s interesting - I wasn’t aware of how fundamentally we’ve moved on in the last 10 years. Presumably you went to uni, so that’s 4 years, so you’ll have the theory I guess? I did my Degree in ‘computing’ in 2003. Did some Java and Web design using Dreamweaver and a whole module on Lotus Notes. Yeah, not super useful!

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 minutes ago

        Looking back ten years I used a different set of tools for a different set of programming languages for different purposes. This has been a general pattern as the industry has evolved over my career.

        Yes I have a good depth and breadth of knowledge that would help me pick things up but I’m not sure relearning the technology would be different from learning a new one, and all the frustrations of old tech would be there.

        As an example, I’d have to relearn the ins and outs of virtual machines and would be damn frustrated to lose the benefits of containers. All that fiddling around with networks, and being tied to specific component brands to get scalable performance. Having to relearn something like puppet or ansible or chef to build out the machines instead of a straightforward dockerfile. And the frustration of how slow it all is and not being able to run anywhere