My assesment is different then the author’s because it isn’t shallow. I also never actually explained what I value in friendships, just that it isn’t the software my friends use.
Your direct comparison brings nothing to the table since it’s mostly a fallacy anyways (bOtH aRe OpiNioNs) and is faulty since there’s nothing on my side to compare.
I’m telling you I don’t understand your point. Am I missing something? Explain it again if I am misunderstanding.
I’m guessing though I will get an other empty one liner saying nothing or no reply so you can keep pretending.
Do you typically get this upset when challenged?
It isn’t much of a challenge if your statement is meaningless.
Seems like you are falling back to rhetoric. I’m guessing you can’t actually justify their opinion because it is actually brutally shallow.
If it’s meaningless why even reply?
Do you typically start running around in circles when challenged?
I mean, if you have a point to make, then make it. It’s just that your previous comment didn’t have any.
I’ve been pretty clear with my responses, including my original one seeing that it was a question.
My assesment is different then the author’s because it isn’t shallow. I also never actually explained what I value in friendships, just that it isn’t the software my friends use.
Your direct comparison brings nothing to the table since it’s mostly a fallacy anyways (bOtH aRe OpiNioNs) and is faulty since there’s nothing on my side to compare.
I’m telling you I don’t understand your point. Am I missing something? Explain it again if I am misunderstanding.
I’m guessing though I will get an other empty one liner saying nothing or no reply so you can keep pretending.