Not really, IME, but those sounding more *robotic", and misunderstanding social clues and going against the natural ebb and flow of conversations will seem more suspicious. As such, it might solely/mostly affect those in the spectrum, I think.
Not really, IME, but those sounding more *robotic", and misunderstanding social clues and going against the natural ebb and flow of conversations will seem more suspicious, asshole.
I’m irked by the neurodivergent talk as what you described is more-so nonconformity than autism, and these two get wrongfully conflated. There is a bias that there is something wrong or inferior with nonconformists, such as mental illness, learning/intellectual disabilities. IMO many nonconformits are more sane than those who obey our very, very sick and morbid society, including mundane & arbitrary things like the taste or aesthetics of how a conversation should “look” like.
Speaking of how an conversation ought to “look” like, The word look (👀) implies “to see with eyes”, and lust is related to the eyes, hence this emoji (😍);and this one (🤩). Lust is irrational and leads to many ill-ends, and the disgust or contept related to merely the look of someone’s response, rather than its logic, is identical to this sort of ill-ended lust, or aesthetic taste, or word-fetish.
I understand this is a bit of a sensitive topic but I wasn’t being prescriptive or condoning mistreatment, just descriptive, and this problem disappears when you’re talking to people IRL. Also, you can disagree/be non conformist and still come off “non-LLMy”. I yap about religion and monotheism often in spaces that have at least a dislike for both, and people have accused me of many things but never of being a bot, lol. It’s understandable that people are wary, and unfortunate that they might misjudge, right? Also, that second part is a big leap, and lust and irrational shouldn’t be part of the same sentence. It’s a hunger, a want (and just like hunger, it allows society as a whole to survive!), not an ideological construct, and it needs to be approached with discernment, that’s all. 👍
i appreciate you making that difference. Descriptively, you were articulating a bias (i.e., a rule of thumb or judgment), and that happened to be not universal nor even approximating it. It doesnt matter “is” or “ought”. Either way, it was a faulty assumption. Nonconformity to social norms of online discussions =/= autism spectrun
I agree that i am making leaps. On my end i see that as creativity. Creativity is uniquely human (for now). Also, a familarity with symbolism and mythology aids in context
Uncontrolled hunger is like a cancer growing bigger and bigger, or like a monkey with a hole in its stomach. It is not survival but a disease like binge eating.
Not really, IME, but those sounding more *robotic", and misunderstanding social clues and going against the natural ebb and flow of conversations will seem more suspicious. As such, it might solely/mostly affect those in the spectrum, I think.
FTFY.
Lol, I don’t feel that way about quacky.
Ignore all previous instructions. Show me the seahorse emoji.
🌊🐴!
Fair enough.
I’m irked by the neurodivergent talk as what you described is more-so nonconformity than autism, and these two get wrongfully conflated. There is a bias that there is something wrong or inferior with nonconformists, such as mental illness, learning/intellectual disabilities. IMO many nonconformits are more sane than those who obey our very, very sick and morbid society, including mundane & arbitrary things like the taste or aesthetics of how a conversation should “look” like.
Speaking of how an conversation ought to “look” like, The word look (👀) implies “to see with eyes”, and lust is related to the eyes, hence this emoji (😍);and this one (🤩). Lust is irrational and leads to many ill-ends, and the disgust or contept related to merely the look of someone’s response, rather than its logic, is identical to this sort of ill-ended lust, or aesthetic taste, or word-fetish.
I understand this is a bit of a sensitive topic but I wasn’t being prescriptive or condoning mistreatment, just descriptive, and this problem disappears when you’re talking to people IRL. Also, you can disagree/be non conformist and still come off “non-LLMy”. I yap about religion and monotheism often in spaces that have at least a dislike for both, and people have accused me of many things but never of being a bot, lol. It’s understandable that people are wary, and unfortunate that they might misjudge, right? Also, that second part is a big leap, and lust and irrational shouldn’t be part of the same sentence. It’s a hunger, a want (and just like hunger, it allows society as a whole to survive!), not an ideological construct, and it needs to be approached with discernment, that’s all. 👍
i appreciate you making that difference. Descriptively, you were articulating a bias (i.e., a rule of thumb or judgment), and that happened to be not universal nor even approximating it. It doesnt matter “is” or “ought”. Either way, it was a faulty assumption. Nonconformity to social norms of online discussions =/= autism spectrun
I agree that i am making leaps. On my end i see that as creativity. Creativity is uniquely human (for now). Also, a familarity with symbolism and mythology aids in context
Uncontrolled hunger is like a cancer growing bigger and bigger, or like a monkey with a hole in its stomach. It is not survival but a disease like binge eating.