technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoMIT on enterprise AI: 95% failure, 5% spam. That Fortune article? The paper's authors are web3 crypto brospivot-to-ai.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1153arrow-down12file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1151arrow-down1external-linkMIT on enterprise AI: 95% failure, 5% spam. That Fortune article? The paper's authors are web3 crypto brospivot-to-ai.comtechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square14fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9vgYq22Q5A&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20250821-mit-on-enterprise-ai-95-failure-5-spam - podcast
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·22 hours agoThis is the actual source of the article from Fortune: https://fortune.com/2025/08/18/mit-report-95-percent-generative-ai-pilots-at-companies-failing-cfo/ And the actual document created by the study: https://mlq.ai/media/quarterly_decks/v0.1_State_of_AI_in_Business_2025_Report.pdf I think this is some of the most damning evidence we have, other than actually just using AI.
This is the actual source of the article from Fortune: https://fortune.com/2025/08/18/mit-report-95-percent-generative-ai-pilots-at-companies-failing-cfo/
And the actual document created by the study: https://mlq.ai/media/quarterly_decks/v0.1_State_of_AI_in_Business_2025_Report.pdf
I think this is some of the most damning evidence we have, other than actually just using AI.