The title is a bit clickbaity but that’s the only story on this I could find and according to the rules, post needs to match the article’s title. Anyways, they are claiming that the government is in possession of the full video with the minute intact, not that the footage posted wasn’t missing a minute

  • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Dead link? Not sure what you mean there. Here’s the important parts of the link I provided.

    On Friday, WIRED published an analysis of metadata embedded in the video, confirmed by independent video forensics experts, which indicates that the file was assembled from at least two source clips, saved multiple times, exported, and then uploaded to the DOJ’s website, where it was presented as “raw” footage.

    WIRED’s initial analysis found that those saves took place over a 23-minute span; however, further analysis of additional metadata shows the file was actually edited and saved several times over a period of more than three and a half hours on May 23, 2025. Specifically, the file was created at 4:48 pm and last modified at 8:16 pm ET that day. The metadata also references “MJCOLE~1,” which is likely a shortened version of a longer username. While it likely begins with “MJCOLE,” the full name cannot be determined from the metadata alone.

    Both analyses found that the two clips, labeled “2025-05-22 16-35-21.mp4” and “2025-05-22 21-12-48.mp4,” were stitched together. The first clip is 4 hours, 19 minutes, and 16 seconds long, but only the first 4 hours, 16 minutes, and 23.368 seconds appears in the published version, meaning nearly 2 minutes and 53 seconds were cut from the end. According to the metadata, the cut occurs just at 11:58:58 pm. The cut is milliseconds before the one-minute recording gap that Bondi said was caused by a quirk of the surveillance system. The second clip, “2025-05-22 21-12-48.mp4,” picks up immediately afterward, continuing the footage from 12:00:00 am until 6:40:00 am.

    • Null User Object@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Here’s the relevant part of the summary that they’re saying you didn’t read.

      Anyways, they are claiming that the government is in possession of the full video with the minute intact, not that the footage posted wasn’t missing a minute

      • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        they are claiming

        And you are trusting blindly.

        I’ve provided evidence. You’re giving me pam bondis trust me bro.

        • Null User Object@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, this whole thread is about you jumping to conclusions and talking about the wrong video. Nobody here is supporting Pam Bondi or her claims/lies. We’re just questioning your reading comprehension skills.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          And you are trusting blindly.

          Stop trying to “win” for 8 seconds and read the damn sentence. Nobody is supporting Bondi. Nobody is trusting anything blindly. You’re railing against something that wasn’t even claimed by Bondi or anyone else.

          • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            They are so completely incapable of admitting that they did not read the article or OP’s summary before posting.