The title is a bit clickbaity but that’s the only story on this I could find and according to the rules, post needs to match the article’s title. Anyways, they are claiming that the government is in possession of the full video with the minute intact, not that the footage posted wasn’t missing a minute

  • Null User Object@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Here’s the relevant part of the summary that they’re saying you didn’t read.

    Anyways, they are claiming that the government is in possession of the full video with the minute intact, not that the footage posted wasn’t missing a minute

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      they are claiming

      And you are trusting blindly.

      I’ve provided evidence. You’re giving me pam bondis trust me bro.

      • Null User Object@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, this whole thread is about you jumping to conclusions and talking about the wrong video. Nobody here is supporting Pam Bondi or her claims/lies. We’re just questioning your reading comprehension skills.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        And you are trusting blindly.

        Stop trying to “win” for 8 seconds and read the damn sentence. Nobody is supporting Bondi. Nobody is trusting anything blindly. You’re railing against something that wasn’t even claimed by Bondi or anyone else.

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          They are so completely incapable of admitting that they did not read the article or OP’s summary before posting.