Noerknhar@feddit.org to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 4 days agoAnthropic can legally train AI on books without authors permission, judge rulescybernews.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1175arrow-down14file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1171arrow-down1external-linkAnthropic can legally train AI on books without authors permission, judge rulescybernews.comNoerknhar@feddit.org to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square38fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days ago“Derivative” is less questionable than “work”. For eg. AI Gen imagery is not copyrightable for the most part, legally closer to plagiarism than art?
minus-squareHobbitFoot @thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoDerivative describes what happened to the copyrighted work, not what slop was churned out by it. If the plagiarism is far enough from the original work, it isn’t protected by the original copyright.
“Derivative” is less questionable than “work”.
For eg. AI Gen imagery is not copyrightable for the most part, legally closer to plagiarism than art?
Derivative describes what happened to the copyrighted work, not what slop was churned out by it.
If the plagiarism is far enough from the original work, it isn’t protected by the original copyright.