cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/15995282

Real unfortunate news for GrapheneOS users as Revolut has decided to ban the use of ‘non-google’ approved OSes. This is currently being posted about and updated by GrahpeneOS over at Bluesky for those who want to follow it more closely.

Edit: had to change the title, originally it said Uber too but I cannot find back to the source of ether that’s true or not…

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    283
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This makes me want to use GrapheneOS more. If the dataminers don’t want you to use it then it must be doing something right.

      • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s only officially supported on google phones because sadly those are the only ones that are not modified to fuck which makes installing and supporting other OS’es way too much work.

        Giving google money once for a device is not a problem from a privacy or security standpoint.

        • Samsy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s correct, but not the reason grapheneOS chooses only pixel phones. It’s the level of hardware security features.

          • XTL@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Also unlockable and presumably has well working builds. It’s not just graphene, but just about every Android project it there that’s best supported on pixels. Other manufacturers have a crazy variety of locking schemes and required tools. Each one is a nightmare to support.

            • orange@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              For GrapheneOS, it’s primarily that it’s re-lockable. That’s why other unlockable phones aren’t supported.

              The GrapheneOS install process sets new OS signing keys so you can lock the phone again and get full verified boot. However, most manufacturers haven’t implemented this feature.

          • ryannathans@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Someone installing graphene os for security shouldn’t be trusting random second/third/etc hand hardware lol

              • XTL@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Hypothetically the hardware could have been modified, but that would take some insane level of a determined attacker to be fabricating modified pixels just to sell them on the used market.

                • Anivia@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Yes, this would only be a concern for targeted attacks by state actors, in which case not even buying new would be safe.

                  Thinking about it, in such a scenario buying used may even be safer

        • 50MYT@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Your options are:

          Apple phone

          Bloated android phone like Samsung etc.

          Chinese android phone (xiami etc)

          Google phone with Android

          Google phone with graphene. This still looks like the best of those options.

          Or no phone? I guess people are hardcore enough that will be the option.

          Edit: I stand corrected.

            • Killercat103@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Is swiftphone its own thing or did you mean shiftphone? I kinda want the shiftphone 8 myself even if they only ship to neighboring countries of mine.

            • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              All of these are insecure as hell. Linux phones especially https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/linux-phones.html

              Fairphone also really fucked up: They signed their own OS with the publicly available (!) AOSP test signing keys. These guys really don’t know that they’re doing, and I would trust their hardware or software whatsoever. And no, installing a custom ROM doesn’t solve this. Considering how bad their security practices are, we genuinely have to assume that there are security issues with the device firmware as well.

              /e/OS is based on the already insecure LineageOS, and it weakens the security further, so it’s not a good option either.

              None of the options you mentioned can be compared to GrapheneOS. It’s currently the best option if you value your privacy and security. You don’t have to give Google money either, since you can just buy a used device, which is also cheaper and more environmentally friendly. Google also makes repairing their devices pretty easy for consumers and even works with iFixit. Here’s a Mastodon post I recently saw about that: https://social.linux.pizza/@midtsveen/113630773097519792

              • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                30 days ago

                An used Pixel, assuming I can find one in my country, still costs four (4) times what I need to shell out for a in-market Lineage compatible phone.

                Theoretical security is cute, but it has to be adjusted to practical feasibility. The most secure computer in the world is useless to you if you can’t boot it up.

            • SeekPie@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              I don’t think LOS has any privacy/security improvements over the stock android?

              (IIRC) it’s even worse than stock because you can’t lock the bootloader after installation.

              Though if your phone isn’t getting official updates, it’s probably safer with LOS.

                • SeekPie@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Yeah, I myself am using CalyxOS, because DivestOS doesn’t support the Fairphone 5 unfortunately. CalyxOS also has relocking.

          • zerozaku@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Xiaomi has the biggest custom ROM scene out there btw despite them trying their hardest to stop bootloader unlocking. You really don’t need to have a company supporting unlocking to make ROMs for them. If they outright block it then that’s an issue.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      111
      ·
      1 month ago

      On the other hand, it makes it easy to find which apps aren’t to be trusted with your data.

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        1 month ago

        Also very obvious when an app or website have an US and an EU version. You just know they buttfuck the Americans because no rules.

        Even Apple had to make two versions of iOS.

    • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Maybe graphene will find a way into duping those apps to think you have a regular android phone?

  • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fuck both of these companies. Never used McDicks app in the first place. Spyware bullshit.

    • Wilmo Bones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      1 month ago

      Right people who install various apps like McDonalds apps etc, are these even typical to GrapheneOS users? I’d think most would avoid superfluous data stealing apps.

      • HereIAm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve been thinking of switching the GrapheneOS. I certainly enjoy my privacy, and are taking steps to move to sources that don’t harvest my data. Outside of YouTube and android I’ve completely degoogled myself, even replaced Maps with magic earth and OsmAnd. I even swapped full time to linux a handful of months ago as a gamer with a VR interest. But I’m not so hardcore to not use any service that might sell my data. I still use vanilla firefox, food ordering apps, and discord for example. So while I’m not someone who goes to extreme lengths to protect my data, moving over to GrapheneOS doesn’t seem like a huge inconvenience compared to the gains you get.

        • dipcart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          I switched to grapheneos on pixel 9 straight from iPhone. The only reason I have any google stuff on the phone is because of RCS messaging. There is literally nothing I have any issues with on this phone, software or hardware. It has been a very smooth and comfortable transition. I very much recommend giving it a try. I think you’d be surprised how little google (exclusively) gives, compared to how much they take.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sorry but it seems I might have been mistaken by calling out Uber on this one. Thought i read about Uber during this but I cant find back to it. Have changed the title.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      What do you mean webapp? Isn’t the app that you install a webapp? And isn’t a website not an app because you dont install it?

      • seang96@spgrn.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        PWA - Portable Web App, Apple was going to make this the primary way to run apps but then decided an app store and private stuff was more profit and their support for it tends to be on the suckier side, but has gotten better over the years. You install a PWA in your browser by either “Install” or “Add to home screen” or something like that depending on browser and device being used.

  • zako@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    the problem here is not the banks or apps, the problem is Google Play Integrity API, which is supposed to enforce to run apps in secured phones and it is used to ban secured ROMs such as GrapheneOS and it allows to run apps on outdated phones without security patches.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      109
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      which is supposed to enforce to run apps in secured phones

      The point of the Google Play Integrity API is to ensure that the user is not in control of their phone, but that one of a small number of megacorps are in control.

      Can the user pull their data out of apps? Not acceptable. Can the user access the app file itself? Not acceptable. Can the user modify apps? Not acceptable.

      Basically it ensures that the user has no control over their own computing.

      • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s simply the “secure” isn’t meant for users but the cooperations. Make it “secure” to their business.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It’s used to help secure the businesses app yes. It helps with things like preventing resource abuse which would cost the company money. E.g. querying mass amounts of data on a loop to increase the companies bill.

      • zako@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you install GrapheneOS, you do not need root, so GrapheneOS is in control of the phone not the user. The key here is if GrapheneOS is secure enough to be certified by Google Play Integrity API. is it security or other issue? perhaps Google is not supporter of FOSS ROMs, perhaps it is not fun of how GrapheneOS removes permissions to Google Apps, …

        If it is not security, this is a kind of monopoly to control which ROMs are allowed to run apps.

      • Anivia@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Can the user access the app file itself? Not acceptable

        This is possible on any Android phone, no root or custom rom required

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Oh, the banks and regulators are to blame. Especially in Europe.

      Find me a PSD2 bank bank that doesn’t require a phone number

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          So the Play Integrity API is literally why I moved to iOS. My bank apps didn’t work with Lineage and the stock OnePlus ROM just sucked ass after the ColorOS or whatever update. I figured I might as well go iOS if I can’t have a custom ROM anyway, and so far it has indeed been a much nicer experience than stock Android. If you can’t TRULY customize everything, might as well at least get stability and consistency out of it, right? Plus at the time, there wasn’t a single Android OEM out there with truly long OS update support.

          Anyway, if this succeeds and custom ROMs are considered to have sound integrity, I might just move back to Android. Graphene seems cool, I haven’t tried it yet because I’ve never owned a Pixel.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 month ago

    Webapps everything you can like I do with Firefox and ublock origin. Fuck these assholes.

  • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I can’t prove it, but I’m 99% sure Lyft did the same thing. Had a perfect rating (and was even a driver at one point), and they banned me without explanation right after I switched to GrapheneOS.

    Emailed them a few times asking for the reason, and they refused to tell me.

    _"Legally, we cannot release any additional information except that we found your account to be violating our Terms of Service.

    We will be in touch if we are able to reopen your account in the future."_

    There’s absolutely nothing else that they could’ve misconstrued as “violating the Terms of Service.”

    If Uber’s going down the same path, no more ride-sharing for me I guess. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

    • kalpol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Uber still works under Lineage. Can’t imagine what the heck they are trying to block

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Its machine learning fingerprinting. They lost the ability to fingerprint you, a flag was raised, and you’re b&

      When this happens to half your accounts, that’s when you know you’re winning at not being tracked

    • UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do the web apps not still work? I’ve booked Uber eats from a computer in the past, I’m imaging the phone browser version might still function. I don’t have lyft in my country to know tho.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      There’s no reason a company couldn’t release the info legally unless it was under something like AML (anti money laundering) laws and you were flagged as a criminal. They legally can’t disclose why in that case.

      Using a different OS isn’t reason enough, if they were telling the truth about the legal restrictions.

  • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 month ago

    This surprises me because McDonald’s app is hands down the worst app I’ve ever encountered in the history of all Android apps.

    It’s is sluggish, ignores touches/taps half the time, doesn’t adhere to Android best practices for flow, crashes a lot, errors a lot, etc.

    But OK McDonald’s. Fuck off.

        • theroff@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          Graphene shills have been banging on this point for donkey’s ages. Reality is that many people use phones that are out of OEM support and many OEM ROMs are bundled with questionable software (Oppo, Samsung etc.) There are some decent criticisms to be made about LineageOS, but others to be made about Grapheme, like its Google-suggestive configurations, which is quite bad for security and privacy. Graphene says this is all optional and not part of the OS, but doesn’t include any equivalent F-Droid installer.

  • tisktisk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is this not a sign of the true intentions on both sides of the dilemma here!?!?
    Let us go to the end. We cannot afford to carry on in fear of these bans. Let the lines be neatly placed and the sides chosen wisely. If sustained profits are desired, the walled-gardens must come down.

    Vote with your dollar and vote again with your data. Wary, but never afraid is the motto privacy comrades!

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Agreed. Leave immediately to other services, and tell them why you’re leaving. It might not make a dent, but you’ll be doing the right thing at least.

  • yoshisaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    man, and i was gonna switch to graphene this christmas. if every app can just ban my OS, i might have to rethink this. i would use the website but they restrict so many things to apps now…

    • The 8232 Project@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      116
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Well, switching to GrapheneOS shows that you don’t care what those companies do, and that you’re willing to fight. It means those companies lose one more customer. The more people that use GrapheneOS, the more companies will be forced to support it.

    • Im_old@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      I was about to switch bank because for a few days my current one (inadvertently) blocked it on grapheneOS. We sent them a few emails and they fixed in less than a week.

      • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        I use a small local credit union that doesn’t appear on their supported list. It’s literally the only thing holding me back, I’m tempted to say fuck it anyway. But I wonder if it might work anyway…

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      TBF, this is the first time I’ve encountered an app not working - and it was before this. It’s just because of Google push towards monopoly via their Play Integrity API that’s ruining this.

      • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 month ago

        play “integrity” should be considered malware, any program that deliberately does something the user doesn’t want it to should.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Use a browser like Native Alpha or Hermit, which present a website like an app.

      And if you use Bitwarden/Vaultwarden for your passwords, it can be pretty seamless.

  • Fuck Yankies@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 month ago

    So, uh, the next version of GrapheneOS will probably come with some Android OS version spoofing tech that solves this - if there isn’t something on F-Droid already.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      No it won’t. Or at least they said on BlueSky that if there had been a work around for this they would have solved it already.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I mean remote attestation is cryptographically secure (unless there’s some temp implementation vulnerability).

  • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 month ago

    Banks seem to be hit or miss, happy that mine works. Would rather switch Banks than use a stock Rom, though.

    All the Uber stuff works in Browser, both eats and their fake taxi stuff.

    Not having a subtle reminder to eat at McDonald’s is probably better for you.

    Honestly, if your app could be a website, and includes services not on your website, fuck you, I’m gonna go to the competition.