• Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 minutes ago

    The only thing I disagree with here is Win8 being apparently better than Win10.

    Win8 was really damn annoying to use without a touchscreen, and while Win8.1 did help, Win10 was by far the better implementation of PC Metro IMO.

    Having said that, Win11 is exactly where it needs to be. It’s all of Win10’s worst traits cranked up to 11 with a heaping of it’s own bullshit and spyware on top

    • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 minutes ago

      Win8 was really damn annoying to use without a touchscreen

      So many people say that but I actually liked the menu. It opened very fast and you could far more quickly find and hit the right tile than that stupid nested programs tree that was the norm in the start menus of earlier Windows versions.

      I’d say considering that telemetry started to creep in primarily with Win 10, 8 was indeed better (meaning less bad).

  • sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    This implies that Linux is rising but still worse than the worst windows os 🫣🫠🫤😴🤧🤮🥴

  • smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 minutes ago

    Wasn’t 98 the precursor to ME? I thought 2000 was the server version (or something like that)?

    • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      Yep. In the beginning there were two threads of Windows garbage: Win NT (for companies, with NT kernel) and (MSDOS-based) Win 9x for peasants. Win 2000 was the “last” Win NT and Win Me was the last Win 9x.

      That’s not 100% true as Me used something called “Real mode DOS” which limited the OS interactions with DOS and Windows XP was an evolution of the NT kernel, and all subsequent windowses come from that kernel (Vista, 7, 8, etc… and the Server variants).

      Win Me was the “Mistake Edition” because it was half-baked, most of Microsoft was focusing by then on the next iteration of NT and they even didn’t ship to developers the Me version but rather Windows 2000.

      And probably Windows Me was on the knowing about 9/11:

      “System Restore suffered from a bug in the date-stamping functionality that could cause System Restore to incorrectly date-stamp snapshots that were taken after September 8, 2001. This could prevent System Restore from locating these snapshots and cause the system restore process to fail. Microsoft released an update to fix this problem.”

  • ddplf@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    56 minutes ago

    Linux is so bad it’s worse than everything else even when others are enshittifying aggressively? Got it!

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    41 minutes ago

    Linux isn’t an upward curve, either. It mostly is, but those krackle-pops have to put a dent in the curve.

  • youngalfred@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Vista wasn’t that bad. The dodgy selling it on computers that couldn’t handle it was an issue (much like they still do with selling laptops with only 32gb storage).

    I still think it was one of the nicest looking - black taskbar with the start button sticking up, sidebar widgets, aero glass etc

    • GiveOver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It was never stable for me. I remember I had a laptop that would always refuse to shut down because “shutdown.exe” was running

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      32 minutes ago

      I remember the hardware situation being very fucked, due to driver authors not updating their shit in time and people trying to get their older stuff working which worked fine under XP, but was incompatible with Vista’s new driver model. It took a couple years until the release of 7 for most of those issues to get ironed out.

  • Fosheze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Win 10 was definitely an improvement over 8. I’d even argue that 10 as it started out was the best since xp. Of course now 10 has been fully enshitified but it used to be good.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I would agree that 10 was very good, but i could say similar things about windows 11 which in many ways performs better then 10.

      And yet its shortly after upgrading to 11 that i switched to linux to never look back.

      I think part of the logic in this meme is that it doesn’t matter how good the basic functions of the operating system are but what does is the design philosophy of the company. Loyalty in other systems decreased while Loyalty in windows gained.

      Microsoft force feeding edge, onedrive, burrying the local account option till after the install with Microsoft account.

      Randomly finding an update put a second weather widget on my taskbar that shows a different weather then the one in start. Taskbar icons that cant be closed, only hidden.

      These things don’t affect the OS functionality in a big deal but its like i was in an abusive relationship that i finally got out of. No matter how much sweet talking and promises to do better i am not going back.

  • De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The colouring is shit, MacOS turns red at its peak. So, was it good or bad at that moment?

    • Blackout@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The software I run a 8 figure business with only works in windows and macs. Not a specific title but the software for an entire industry. Linux is nice but still a novelty in my world.

      • teslasaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Same. Until Linux is supported by scada systems it will only be a service, non-hmi OS, in my world.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        What software is that? Is it something with a really heavy desktop client by nature (e.g CAD, video editing), or could it instead have a browser-based frontend?

        • Blackout@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yes, CAD/CAM stuff like Catia, SW, mastercam, etc. It will take a lot of market share improvements to convince the developers to bother with a port. I’m no M$ fanboy, just no real production alternative.

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            51 minutes ago

            I reckon they might be using a lot of Windows specific libraries, making any porting a real pain in the ass. And when you’re in that space, unfortunately people just have to choose the OS that goes with their applications, not the other way around.

            It’s literally easier to start an entirely new CAD/CAM project and make that cross-platform. Unfortunately, that’s a 7 or 8 figure proposition to get started as well (probably 8 for a polished product that can pull proper market share).

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    That’s not completely true, in Linux there are many points where old software sucks and new software isn’t ready for mass adoption. Like when everyone knew x11 was deprecated but nothing supported Wayland (to this day major WMs like cinnamon and xfce still haven’t switched over and most small wms never will). It gets better over time but there are dips in quality and Linux devs do sometimes make mistakes.

    • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      True, Linux is both the best and the worst at the same time.

      The Base OS is great, but the apps are mostly terrible, with a few notable exceptions.

      • grill@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        And half of the settings moved from old control panel to a new crappy UI settings. At least commit and move all of them.

        I never find what I am looking for in there, without opening and closing a bunch of windows. I swear they regularly move location of some settings. Search function is pretty bad too.

        • filcuk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Oh they want to, but i bet that shit’s so intertwined that removing old audio menu will make your display output stop working.

      • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        If you dunno how to switch that off in 3 clicks you should probably stay away from computers mate lol

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Agreed, but to say an operating system is so much worse because 3 clicks when comparing overall functionality seems highly exaggerated. There is a reason most companies went from 7 to 10 and skipped 8. They are also going to 11. You could argue that enterprise OS’s are separate though, but really they are very similar, and the reason windows does so well in companies is because most users have it at home. If most users go to something else at home, (or simply stop using home computers with the switch to phones, tablets) then enterprise will change and slowly feed the prominent OS for work back to home use. It’s a catch 22. If the standard user has to use something 40 hours a week at work, when they come home that is what they will be used to. Also what their kids will become used to. But companies don’t like to change what people are used to, as it slows production, and costs a lot more in training.

            • Malix@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              31 minutes ago

              Yup, reasonable points.

              But, it is 3 clicks for now, but it might not even be an option later on. Yea yea, doomer and tinfoilhats. :)

  • thisfro@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What’s so bad about win 11 as an OS? For me it’s the most stable windows. Of course the MS crap they want you to include is bs, but that’s not really the OS

    • subignition@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Rule of thumb: If it’s included with an install where you’re clicking through the defaults, to the average user the distinction doesn’t matter, it’s part of the OS

    • Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s part of the OS? All of the telemetry, ads, and strange news thingy is a standard part of the OS - if you try to remove it, it’ll just get back with any updates.

      So it is really the OS

      it’s the same way ubuntu bad now, forcing snaps