You may have noticed that in recent weeks, the Biden administration has been rolling out a hell of a lot of new regulations. Earlier this month it was big student loan reforms and a massive improvement in how public lands are managed, then this week we had better pay and working conditions for working Americans, minimum staffing ratios for nursing homes, and even improved service on airlines.

That’s not only because it’s an election year, though Joe & Kamala certainly do like to point out that where the Other Guy rages (and wants to raise inflation!) they’ve been busy making Americans’ lives better. But the bigger reason is that the administration wants to get new rules finalized prior to May, to keep them from being tossed out in the next Congress via the Congressional Review Act, which Donald Trump and his cronies used to reverse a bunch of Barack Obama’s environmental regulations.

. . . The requirement that coal plants find a way to eliminate 90 percent of their emissions by 2032 effectively accelerates the end of coal for power generation, which was inevitable anyway. Roughly 70 percent of US coal plants have already closed, and last year, coal generated only 16 percent of electric power, a new record low. In addition to the emissions rule, three other final rules also impose strict new limits on mercury, coal ash, and pollution of wastewater, to put an end to the environmental degradation caused by coal.

. . . The other option, obviously, would be for utilities to meet coming demand with renewables, as administration officials pointed out when previewing the new rule. Thanks to the IRA’s hundreds of billions of dollars in incentives, carbon-free power generation, including battery storage, already beats the cost of building new gas plants. Going forward, the administration is confident renewables will be the far more cost-effective and reliable way to meet increasing demand by 2032, when the emissions limits fully kick in.

  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    The idea that I’m a right wing troll is ridiculous, and I think you could learn a lot by exploring why you jump so easily to that assumption.

    I mean, okay, let’s give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you’re being genuine here. Surely you acknowledge the absolute deluge of obvious propaganda, rehashed from 2016, trying to convince young, idealistic, uninformed voters to either not vote or to vote 3rd party. It’s not an unreasonable assumption that anyone making comments in that vein is an agitator or a useful idiot. It’s correct most of the time.

    Getting drawn into one-sided good faith debates with such people is playing into their hands. Ridicule and dismissal defeats them.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      okay, let’s give you the benefit of the doubt

      If there is still doubt then you’re just an idiot, but I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you just think you’re being witty.

      I acknowledge Oct 7. That doesn’t mean I endorse the response. It seems like an obvious response. It seems maximally oppositional to their attackers. It’s also exactly what their attackers wanted.

      Getting drawn into one-sided good faith debates with such people is playing into their hands. Ridicule and dismissal defeats them.

      I’ve already explained to you why this is wrong. You are just making an assertion without even a hint of a theory as to why it’s correct. You don’t think that they expect you to do this? You think they don’t expect you to piss off actual progressives when you act that way?

      You identified me as a right wing troll as a result of their posts, and I never even said anything of the sort. In my recent history you can see me arguing against a lot of their bullshit, including “genocide Joe”. Hell, you can go back to 10+ years of posts on Reddit with this username if you really want.

      This is exactly the dumb behavior my original comment was about. You’re not helping.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Do you or do you not acknowledge that there have been a lot of trolls and propaganda? Instead of answering my question you went on a weird tangent about Oct 7.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          It wasn’t a tangent, it was an analogy. I have also made it clear several times that right wing trolls exist. Why would I be discussing their strategy and how you’re playing into it if I didn’t think they exist? I don’t think you are exactly trolling, but at this point it’s clear to me that you are not trying to understand what I’m saying at all. I see no point in continuing.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Well we need to have a baseline agreement on the state of things before we discuss how best to handle it. I was trying to nail you down on that first. If you didn’t believe trolls were a problem, there’d be no point in discussing how to handle them.

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Everything you need to understand my position is in the thread. I haven’t exactly been difficult to follow.

              It’s all moot anyways. It just became crystal clear that Biden doesn’t care about the election, so it’s all going to come down to how quickly Trump implodes.

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                You’re talking about his statement on the protests? If so, I wish I could agree. I’m very disappointed in his stance. But it’s definitely calculated to win the election. There’s just more Israel supporters than Palestine supporters. And the Israel supporters are far more likely to vote. Did he do the right thing, morally? No. Did he do the thing more likely to win him votes? Probably.

                • Tinidril@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  OMFG, if we are going to do this, can you promise to pay attention? I’ll be optimistic and assume you’ll try this time.

                  First of all, you are just flat wrong about support for Israel’s occupation of Gaza. Maybe on October 8, but that support has tumbled.

                  https://news.gallup.com/poll/642695/majority-disapprove-israeli-action-gaza.aspx

                  Second, Democrats win or lose elections on exactly one thing - turnout. The voters who may or may not show up are the whole fucking ballgame.

                  Third, the handling of that press conference was absolute political malpractice. I’m no fan of spin, but sometimes not even trying can be even more insulting.

                  Reporter: Have these protests caused you to reconsider any of the policies with regard to the region?

                  Biden: “No.” - Mic drop, leaves podium.

                  Even without all the unnecessary lies in the rest of the conference, that is an absolute trash fire. Nobody expected Biden would stop supporting Israel, but being that tone deaf is remarkable for a career politician at the literal peak of their profession.

                  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    I agree with everything except the second point. What you say is true, but Leftists have proven themselves not to be counted on for turnout. A Democrat could expend all their energy chasing the Left, alienating a lot of centrists, and then one little thing starts making the rounds on Tiktok right before the election and y’all will abandon him. It doesn’t even have to be true. The GOP could make a doctored video of him saying the N-word, and the suspicion alone would drive away enough Leftists to cost him the election.

                    Centrist voters are dependable. Leftist voters are fickle. Add in the fact that there’s a LOT more centrist voters, and the calculus is obvious.

                    That said, I do think he blundered here. As you said, numbers on Israel are changing. Biden came down too hard on the side of Israel, not just morally but also politically.

                    Bidens best bet here was to be vague and noncommittal until Israel finally commits an atrocity covered enough by the media to tip a critical mass of centrists against Israel. Then Biden could suspend aid and be seen as a hero by all. He’s severely limited the chance of that happening now.