• nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    219
    ·
    1 year ago

    The vaccine was clearly rushed into production and saved a lot of vulnerable people’s lives. That does not mean it does not have risks that, for younger and healthier people, those might outweigh the benefits.

    But public hysteria and groupthink dictated that it had to be coerced on people.

    • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      148
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The vaccine underwent the exact same rigorous testing that literally every other vaccine or medication gets. The only difference is that COVID vaccines were given a free pass to the front of the line at each step necessary. As well, due to them having a much shorter timeline and higher competition, it was economical to run multiple tests in parallel that would normally have been done in series.

      It wasn’t “rushed” as in sloppy, it was “rushed” in that it was given priority in the various governmental queues.

      • brognak@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Don’t bother, the person your responding to has the brainpower of a fairly intelligent frog.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have relatives that think the way the person you’re replying to does. “There’s no way it can be safe.”

        I was grieving their position last night (momentarily, I’ve accepted that they think this way but it still makes me sad). There’s nothing I can do to persuade them. The fact that I’ve had four jabs and I’m still fine isn’t worth pointing out.

        I agree with a sibling comment that says it isn’t worth trying to educate the willfully ignorant. However, you did a great job of saying it concisely. I appreciate you.

        Ask me if my relatives have american flag iconography on their walls. Spoiler: they do. It’s almost as though there’s a very specific type of person who falls for this shit.

    • terabytes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perhaps, now that the vaccine has been around for years and there’s plenty of data on its efficacy and risks, you might cite some of those risks? Because the data I’ve seen shows that infection is still much worse for your health than vaccination, regardless of whether or not you are “young and healthier.” I would be very interested to see what data you have that shows otherwise. I quite like being proven wrong.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That does not mean it does not have risks that

      The benefits outweigh the risks, even in the young and healthy, so the vaccines are recommended to everyone.

      • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        56
        ·
        1 year ago

        Indeed. Because the young men dropping dead from heart inflammation all were sick due to climate change.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          48
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I love how people mention heart inflammation from the vaccines, but they never talk about heart inflammation from COVID itself - it’s more common with COVID itself, and it’s more severe with COVID itself.

          But hey, gotta hate on the vaccines, am I right?

          • brognak@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            35
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            These are the same people who argue against wearing seatbelts and mandatory airbags because they could potentially be worse than an accident without them, which is ignoring the 99.999% of the time they help.

              • Cam@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                20
                ·
                1 year ago

                And the vaccine was a choice. Noone was forced to take it.

                Many lost their jobs and in places like Canada could not leave the country for refusing to take the vaccine? It was not a choice, it was forced and those who wished to be left alone, lost basic freedoms.

                Imagine you wanted to leave Canada to go to a better place, but you were denied since you needed to show a digital ID. Think about it.

                • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The provincial superior courts and the Supreme Court have long held and being vaccinated can be a requirement of employment. The people who lost their jobs did so because they did not meet their conditions of employment. Their choice.

                  You have the right under Section 6 of the Charter to cross provincial borders without restriction, to live anywhere in the country you choose to, and to leave Canada and return to Canada.

                  You could have walked to the border and left Canada if the US would take you (it wouldn’t nor would any other country). If you were outside of Canada you could have walked to to the border and entered Canada but you would probably have been required to quantine for a couple of weeks. Your rights were never in any danger you just don’t understand what they are.

                  • Cam@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    and to leave Canada and return to Canada

                    This is false. Canadians could not board planes. How can you leave the country if you were denied access to a plane ride? This did violate the Canadian charter of human rights.

                    Yeah the US also blocked access to the unvaxxed, the only neighbouring country to Canada. And denying access to air travel was not done to “stop the spread of COVID”. It was malice, and to make excuses for this with twisted logic is quite disturbing to say the least.

            • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              They do, that’s why you’re likely not vaccinated right now, and why people who are against it are not vaccinated.

              Freedom of choice does not mean freedom from consequences of choices. If you make a bad choice, you aren’t entitled to be free from the consequences of that choice.

            • Wirrvogel@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If you run around with Covid making others sick, you do not just weigh a risk for yourself, you are also inflicting it onto others. If too many do that, society breaks because hospitals get overwhelmed, firefighters and law enforcement are sick, the grocery store has to close and the government stops working. Children are unattended and whatever else.

              If you do not wear a set belt your broken body takes up a hospital bed too, or are you going to accept the weight of your decision and abstain from health care because you inflicted that harm on yourself? Be welcome to not wear a seatbelt then, but make sure to have a big sticker on your car that says: “My head injury was my choice, so do not help.”

              • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                18
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think

                1. Most people are actually mostly reasonable most of the time because they don’t want to die or be seriously injured
                2. Generally then, your scenario is unrealistic
                3. If it were true, that most people were just dying to get brain damage in car accidents we could probably deal with it in a non-authoritarian way

                Consider the billions per month alcohol and tobacco cost public health systems. We still let people do these things. Frankly I’d very much be in favor of taxing smokers more if they wanted to use the public health system.

                The reality is, you just like a more controlling society as I like a more free one.

    • OmegaII@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The vaccine went so fast because most of the part was already known and they had solution for other covid variants. They only needed to adapt it to attack the correct part of this covid 19 virus. It wasn’t a new study. It wasn’t rushed. And this person wasn’t healthy but terminal. Healthy, lol.

    • BucketHat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand this logic. It had to be quickly developed because the entire world population was affected by COVID. We’re talking about millions of deaths. Economies halted, everything literally went stand still and you expected the vaccine to take 3 years to develop?

      I’m sure it might have sounded scary to have medicine developed so rapidly but I don’t think you realize the scale at how it was developed because so many countries and companies dumped a ton of money researching a cure out the door as fast as possible.

      Sure there are side-effects but in that case the side effects were worth having versus the deaths of high risk individuals.

      Edit: reduced sensationalism

      • DV8@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure there are side-effects but in that case the side effects were worth having versus millions of deaths

        I mean, one of the most commonly mentioned side effects was something that happened in a much more serious form with a real COVID infection. It’s the easiest way to meet antivaxxers in the middle if they’re arguing in good faith. Even if there’s a significant side effect of myocarditis, it’s not nearly as common or heavy as the myocarditis die effect of an actual infection.

        • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          As I recall, all the side effects of the Covid vaccines are side effects present with other vaccines, and they are all auto-immune responses. You are at a much much greater risk of all of those if you actually caught Covid.

          I suppose there is a bit of calculus involved. If you are 100 times more likely to suffer from Guillain–Barré syndrome or myocarditis if you catch a disease, but the disease is exceptionally rare, it might not make sense to get a vaccine. In Covid’s case though, a substantial amount of the general population caught Covid, meaning that the overall risk was substantially reduced by being vaccinated.

          Some people just seem to have trouble with risks and percentages; shades of grey rather than black or white. Getting vaccinated isnt 100% the right call, it’s only 99.99+% the right call. Ironic that the same people were totally cool with a 0.5% of Covid killing them, never mind all the other severe side effects. You were asking them to make a choice between 99.99% fine vs. 90% fine or 99.9999+% non-lethal and 99.5% non-lethal. You look at the relative risks though and the vaccine was thousands of times more safe than catching Covid unvaccinated.

        • GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Any sort of medical treatment has side effects. For instance I got diabetes, you know what the side effects of using Insulin is? Death. Do you know what the side effects of untreated diabetes is? Death. Do you know what the side effect of life is? Eventually death. We are all going to get there someday, but I mean might as well stretch it out as long as possible, way I see it. There’s so much I want to see, after all. Are the Leafs ever going to win the cup? Am I ever going to see retirement? Do I ever get my Corvette? This lady in the story is never going to have any of those answers, because they were too worried about side effects.

          That’s what I don’t get about these people barking about the side effects, I mean it might kill you or make you stupid, sure (I mean it’s possible, but highly unlikely). But so can falling out of bed in the morning. Or you know, COVID or whatever other disease you are trying to prevent. Was it raced out? I mean, sure. But pandemics, you know? Not a lot of time on anyones hands. And I’d say they’ve been pretty god damn effective. Like they bitch about shutting things down and the economy and mAH freedumbs, but then they bitch about racing out the vaccines, it’s like shit, what can we do to make you folks happy here?

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        because the entire world population was dying from COVID

        Okay I’m no anti vaxxer but this is just going to get you laughed at by the people you’re trying to convince.

        About 1% was at risk of death, and that’s no small number, and we all had to get vaccinated to protect them, and that’s fine. But outright stating the entire world population was dying is just laughable sensationalism.

        If you want to convince people, you’re never going to do it with sensationalism, especially when that sensationalism is so dramatic is flat out wrong.

        • Wirrvogel@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was overwhelming hospitals, which means people with other problems were dying, because ambulances were not getting to them, surgeries had to be postponed. If all your firefighters are sick, more people will die in fires and accidents. If a high number of people in a society get sick that society is breaking. No law enforcement, no health care, no working government, no grocery store.

          You are one of the people that complain when action is taken and works that that action wasn’t needed because it wasn’t that bad and when no action is taken how bad the government is. And Covid wasn’t at all the worst it could have been. There will be a next virus in the future and people like you will not have learned anything from this one and drive us into an even worse crisis, just by being stubborn.

          • towerful@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Best counter point is y2k.
            Huge publicity. Massive amounts of money spent.
            New year 1999/2000 was uneventful (except for parties).
            … Y2k was a hoax, waste of money… Wut?!

            It wasn’t. There’s is proof of such. It was removed/mitigated by a huge effort of developers.

            • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              “We spent millions of dollars and a year preparing and NOTHING HAPPENED! All that time and money wasted!”

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            You are one of the people that complain when action is taken and works that that action wasn’t needed because it wasn’t that bad and when no action is taken how bad the government is.

            Yup, that’s basically the entirety of the whole anti-vax thing in one sentence. Vaccines have been so effective at eradicating so many diseases people don’t have a concept of have deadly diseases can be and can’t grasp why getting a vaccine is so important to protect them from disease.

          • Cam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            Stop watching the news man. None of what you said actually happened.

            • Wirrvogel@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It did not happen because most people stayed at home, were wearing a mask, followed social distancing rules, were working from home, kept their children at home, washed their hands and got the vaccine when it was available. Again, it did not happen because we stopped it from happening and now you go “it wasn’t that bad” ignoring the billions of people who stopped it from getting that bad.

              It’s like “seatbelts are against my freedom” and when everyone wears one to go “look people don’t die in car crashs that proofs seatbelts are unnecessary and only made up by the news” when the reason for them not dying is that they wear a seatbelt.

              • Cam@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                The vaccine, a mysterious injection that was forced on the population, created by big pharma who has a repuation for dishonesty for decades. Comparing this to seatbelts is a horrible comparision. Seatbelts BTW are straps you wear to ensure you do not go flying out the wind shield during a car crash. No mystery around that, no closed source injection being pumped into your bloodstream when wearing a seat belt.

                And COVID mass deaths would of not happen if life was allowed to go on as normal. There were places like South Dakota that did nothing authoritative and I do know South Dakota still exists, life goes on.

                Again, stop watching the news. Unplug from the matrix and then you will see the source code to all of this madness.

      • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        54
        ·
        1 year ago

        Economies halted because the public freaked out. The vast, vast majority of healthy people were absolutely fine. Most of those who died, with respect, had relatively few years of life left anyway.

        Society should strive to keep these vulnerable people as safe as possible. But I personally think it was incredibly unethical to shut down whole economies just for that.

        • nicktron@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Still waiting for you to cite the risks that outweigh the benefits, now that too much time has passed for you to still thing of it as “rushed”.

                • yata@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  26
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  They already did, that was done before they launched the vaccines. You still don’t think they are safe, so now it is up to you to prove why. Which you can’t, because you have nothing but your feelings to show for it.

                  • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    27
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    They did but it was an abridged version shall we say. Which is fine. It was an emergency and the law foresees this.

                    But the cultural shift towards harm avoidance at all costs and general authoritarianism (as clearly on display here on this site) led governments the world over to, use heavy handed tactics, shall we say, to get people to take it.

                    I am absolutely not against the vaccines. I got three doses of Pfizer. But I am profoundly against the heavy handed tactics used in deploying them.

        • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was in Spain at the beginning of the pandemic. The bodies they were stacking in the back of army trucks because their mortuary system had collapsed were not fine.

      • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course I do. Your body creates antibodies to viral proteins or particles and develops memory to them. In this case the antigens are created by your own body via injected mRNA enclosed in lipids, not an injected weakened or dead viruses.

        • EarMaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          So…you proved you don’t have any idea. For illnesses like COVID-19 it is key for a vaccine to be applied to as many people as possible to make it harder - in the final consequence impossible - for the disease to spread.

          • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            30
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s the case with a vaccine to any contagious disease. Life has trade offs. I prever not to live under an authoritarian state. I don’t think hive-minded harm avoidance is the be all and end all of existence.

            • Wirrvogel@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I mean she did not avoid harm and no one forced her to, so everything is ok. She also wasn’t forced to get vaccinated, she could say no just fine which means there was no authoritarian state controlling her. Decisions come with consequences. The consequence for her was a certain death in a short timeframe.

              What is wrong is to make decisions and expect others to bare the consequences, like getting a rare transplant and risking it because you could get Covid and die from it because for the transplant to work your immune system needs to be held back for some time, while someone who would have done everything possible to make this work can’t get a transplant.

              Also there needs to be a level of trust between a doctor and a patient, so if she gets told to take specific medication or live her life in a specific way after the surgery, she will accept the advice. She was willing to take the transplant, but did not trust the doctors with the vaccine, what would she not have trusted them with?

              She had her trade off and I hope she died thinking it was worth it.

              • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well put. She made her choice. I doubt she accepted the consequences of her choice though. All the noise about being “denied” an organ, the fundraiser, the noise she made.

                A lot of people are going to die waiting for an organ transplant, there aren’t enough to go around. No one is entitled to an organ, someone has to die to donate one (other than kidneys). Her demanding an organ is condemning someone else waiting to death. It the fundamental ethical calculus of organ transplants and organ donation.

                I just really get the impression that she felt entitled to an organ despite choosing not to follow all medical advice.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              What authoritarian state? No one has been required to get the vaccine. People just call you an idiot for not doing so.

              • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                19
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, you were not required to. But you were also excluded from a lot of life if you didn’t. And a lot of people were foaming at the mouth and very much desirous of an outright requirement.

                • Natanael@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re likewise excluded from a lot of you permanently walk around drunk. Still your own problem.

                • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But you said

                  I prever not to live under an authoritarian state.

                  So what authoritarian state? Being “excluded from a lot of life” is not an authoritarian state if it was just a result of people deciding not to be around you if you made the choice to be a health risk.

                  Or is this like a child screaming “YOU CAN’T TELL ME WHAT TO DO!!!” Just because they can?

                • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I didn’t want to have to sit next to someone infected with infectious disease when on an airplane.

                  Don’t blame the government, they were just implementing policies I wanted to protect me from people that had a higher probability of being a disease carrier because they get their medical advice from the internet.

                • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “I showed up to the potluck with nothing even though I was told that I needed to bring something and expected to get the same things that everyone who brought something did, AiTA?”

            • LeFantome@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Life has trade-offs” is an interring philosophy to apply when you enjoy the benefits and others incur the costs.

              There is a reason we do not let people breathe second hand cigarette smoke onto people’s faces at work.

              There is a reason we apply speed limits on roads.

              There is a reason that civilization has adopted rules of society that supercede the individual in every system ever devised.

              The reason is that the collective has decided that being protected from the particularly terrible and wreck less decisions of the worst of us is a worthwhile “trade-off”.

            • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Guess you can just hope to never need an organ donation!

              Life has tradeoffs after all.

        • cry@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          A fair percentage of them are? Certainly higher percentage than people that are vaccinated.

          There are several other factors at work here, and I get that you are responding to a mock question with a mock answer.

            • cry@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Tell that to countries like Peru and Mexico who had little vaccination and a mortality rate of nearly 5%. Compared to the countries who had the highest vaccination rate with mortality of less than .05%

              So… over 100 times more?

              USA and CA had 1.1% so 5 times more… (erm that makes no sense, but you get what i mean. I need coffee)

              EDIT: my main source https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality

        • LeFantome@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are right, not ALL the people that did not get vaccinated died. Just way more of them as a percentage than those that did. So, you win?

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Someone needing an organ transplant doesn’t sound like “younger” or “healthier” people.
      According to your criteria, regardless of vaccine efficacy: this sounds like someone that should have been vaccinated.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is stupid on several levels, but I ain’t got time for all that so I’ll just point out that this lady wasn’t younger or healthier, given that she died without an organ transplant, and had she received a transplant she would be one of the vulnerable people on immunosupprressants. So even this stupid ass argument doesn’t apply in this situation.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah yes the young healthy person who needs an organ transplant. Can’t forget about that demographic.

      • GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You know what? It’s a fucking opinion. This sort of shit is why we keep going through this over and over and over and over again. It’s why everyone’s so fired up.

        Do I think they are absolutely wrong? Honestly, yeah I do. But trying to suppress opinions you don’t agree with, using mock outrage isn’t really any better. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together can read this comment, shake their head and move on with their day. Screaming outrage and how dare they, supress them, block them, disinformation, report them/supress them, whatever else, honestly that makes you the fuckhead. Sorry pal.

        The rest of us normies are quite capable of ignoring morons, don’t worry. We don’t need babysitters. The longer this sorta horseshit continues, the longer we gotta deal with all these dickheads and their signs in traffic and whatever else. Because they aren’t exactly wrong in that their free speech is being suppressed. Again, I ain’t saying I agree with them, but like this woman, she had the right to do what she did, and she fucked around and found out. Evidently.

        • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “If you are not a scientist, and you disagree with scientists about science, it’s actually not a disagreement. You’re just wrong.”

          The problem is that these wrong “opinions” are presents as fact, facts that are believed by the scared and the gullible, and they grow and gain a life of their own until someone uses them to manipulated someone who is vulnerable into literally dying instead of getting a safe, effective vaccine.

          Lies and fear and hate are dangerous. Lies caused a violent mob to storm the seat of US democracy and lies caused this woman, this wife, this mother, this grandmother, this Canadian, to sacrifice herself.

          The smart people have a moral obligation to reject and challenge and contradict these dangerous lies.

          Another of my favorites… “Science said one thing then it said another thing. We can’t trust anything science says.”

          “Science is not truth. Science is finding the truth. When science changes its opinion, it didn’t lie to you. It learned more.”

          • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The problem is there is no chance to refute any of it if you or other mods remove it. I can’t stand the conviction behind some of these beliefs but also I think its much worse to see it being removed

            • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The mods aren’t removing everything. They have made that very clear in at least two posts. The ones where there is a good, detailed response are being left up. In one case a mod put a comment ahead of one saying, “the comment below is wrong but I’m leaving in there because the responses are good”. I think the mod is doing a good job.

              • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m aware. And I fully support the mods not allowing this place to turn into what r/Canada became. But it doesn’t feel right to me to remove posts just based on a commenter saying some bullshit but with enough conviction to say it as a fact.

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s ok to be autistic. You don’t have to try and blame it on a vaccine.

      • Wirrvogel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Please not. I am an autist and I am vaccinated three times, waiting for the new vaccines to arrive for my fourth. Being stubborn and unwilling to learn and being autistic are two very different things. One of them is a choice the other isn’t.

      • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        For many people, myself, my daughter, and many of my coworkers, autism isn’t a disability, it’s a superpower. Many well known big thinkers were autists. Some will known monsters were, too. Autism causes vaccines.

        • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Im with you as someone on the spectrum. Which is why I wonder why so many people fear it to the point of blaming it on vaccines?

          • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Meh…I let the normies have their fears and prejudices then, when the time is right, I whip out the weaponized Autism and take them by surprise.

            That’s what my Autistic friend calls it when one of us does something so wild that it blows the normies minds. A few weeks ago we got a late request to respond to an RFP. I had some cycles so I raised my hand. It was 516 questions, it was Friday afternoon, and we had until the next Friday to write our responses, review our responses, get the package together and to our partner so they could submit it to the customer. I told them to start working on the supporting material and leave the questions with me. I sat down on Sunday morning at 7 AM with my notebook, some dark trance music, and my two cats and wrote 504 answers over the next 30 hours. There was a HUGE scramble once they realized that I was done and they had to get their shit together and actually get it submitted. That’s the power of weaponized autism.