• BaraCoded@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    48 minutes ago

    Writer insight : if people start pulling their phone when they should be watching your movie, it means your movie is shit, not that it should be made even sloppier. Watered down shit is still a shit cocktail.

  • yogurt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    57 minutes ago

    The amount of reciprocal effort art is socially allowed to demand from the audience changes. The art form gets refined and people respect that and are willing to invest more attention, then at some point it’s opera and nobody goes because it requires too much attention and respect. Netflix might suck but on the other hand Christopher Nolan is making movies with inaudible dialogue and Game of Thrones has invisible fight scenes because they got out of hand with it and think they can demand you only watch their thing alone in a soundproof HDR screening room.

  • Switorik@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This is what kills any articles on the web. The first three paragraphs repeat the question you’re looking to get answered and the last paragraph vaguely answers it.

    I feel like an old person now but I’ve started watching movies from the 90s/2000s and I can’t believe how much worse movies have become over the years.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I decided to work from home and put fury road since I haven’t seen it. 10 minutes in i logged off work early because it was good.

    Ppl will not focus on what gives them the most enjoyment. If its the phone or Netflix.

  • Nangijala@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Good thing we canceled our Netflix subscription last year when Trump threatened to invade our country the first time.

    Even greater that now that he is threatening to do it again, and seemingly is more serious about it, we are one year into being back on physical media and we fucking love it. Dvds and blurays are so much better than shitflix.

  • slappyfuck@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I don’t see anything wrong with this. Have them wear crazy outfits that no one will see either.

  • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s the big tech social media disease.

    Everyone, frigging everyone who steps away from fb/insta/twittler/yt/tiktok/… says the same “holy shit my mind is so peaceful all of a sudden.” And somehow it’s not substantially part of the daily discourse. Somehow between that and EVERYTHING else these mfrs are responsible for (protecting pedos, encouraging insurrections, …) just flies.

    It’s a disease, an addiction, a plague and we gotta start naming it as such. Talk to your loved ones and carefully try to get them off that shit.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Lemmy/Piefed is an echo chamber, and has some structural issues like Reddit. But there’s no algo, no advertising, nor constant phone notifications.

        And, uh, no billionaires warping “open” discourse.

        To me, it’s a time black hole, worse than old forums. But it’s not nearly as bad as (say) Discord or anything Facebook owned.

      • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        You tell me:

        -are you getting ads/shorts/brainrot shoved in face every single second?

        -is the public on lemmy tolerant of sexoffenders? Nazis?

        -ads? (Yes, I initially misspelled it as “adds” this guy right here)

        -do you have superfluous bs following you around?

        I think not.

        • wuzzlewoggle@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You forgot:

          • Is an algorithm shoving political divisive rage bait down your throat?

          But thanks for listing why I like it here

        • denaggels@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Regarding adds: I guess if you fight one lemmy user, others will spawn and come to help. So I would say yes, there are adds

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I like when Matt Damon restates his name three or four times in the dialogue

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    It’s not just me, right? Modern movies and shows have less things happen in same duration of time.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Modern shows are lazy, they are like 6, 10 episodes tops. The simpsons in the 90s before they sucked did almost 30. They would take summer off, then breaks on xmas and spring but a show a week otherwise.

      • FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Dude… That was annual, too. These modern day 8-episode shows will have YEARS between seasons. Like, motherfucker, half your scenes are green screen in a big sound studio – what the fuck is taking you so long?!

    • TheOriginalGregToo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I would actually argue the opposite. Modern movie plots are an ADD fever dream. There are so many things going on that keeping track is an absolute chore.

      • Potatar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        No they are not. I cannot watch them unless i speed them up past what Netflix allows me. They are so slow and information sparse that i cannot watch them.

        • kofe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Depending on what shows you watched, plenty from the 90s/00s assumed viewers wouldnt make it for the airing once a week. So they did fluff a bunch and rely on “this week’s monster” rather than dense series plots. I remember despising dragon ball z (my brothers favorite) because multiple episodes would go by with fuckin NOTHING happening.

    • Triasha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This is part of the genius of kpop demon hunters. It moves fast, sometimes frenetically.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    184
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Make movies that are engaging enough to keep people from checking their feeds while they wait for something to happen.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      My wife said that the Wire was hard to follow and boring, but she also checked her phone every 5 minutes and was carrying on a conversation there with her friends. She also impulsively pulled out facebook and scrolled a bit. I pointed all this out but Its still the shows fault somehow.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I dunno man, I can’t get my friends to watch some stellar movies because their attention span has been shot over time.

      Believe it or not, they’ll watch crappier movies because they don’t need to pay attention.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Part of it is the movie, but a large part is that short form video trains your brain to need frequent dopamine fixes. A 5 second video does that, while a 90 minute movie might not give it until the climax.

      It’s not much different than a smoker taking a break during a movie.

      • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        If someone starts a movie and immediately pulls their phone out or starts cleaning, that’s on them.

        And movies absolutely should not be made to cater to addiction. Nothing should, except for something explicitly designed to help people recover from addiction.

        When movies have a good idea and are given the proper attention to make them well, regular people won’t be checking the time or reading blogs when they become bored. The problem is that studios say that, good idea or not, proper attention to the craft or not, we’re making this many movies this year. We’re lucky if a few of those movies are something future generations would consider good.

        Matt Damon is suggesting that movies be made even worse than they already are.

        • BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Matt Damon is suggesting

          It definitely reads more as “Netflix execs suggest and Matt Damon complains about”

      • WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I can’t stand short videos. I won’t even watch videos that aren’t an hour or longer myself. I don’t get these shorts, it’s so unsatisfying.

    • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It literally doesn’t work for most people anymore

      Short form videos fried people’s attention and dopamine needs

      • MotoAsh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        lol yea, toootally nothing to do with it. That’s why nobody ever talks about great movies, and movies toooootally aren’t getting longer nad longer… yep, totally not a quality to attention thing.

        Not like there are legendary movies that are several hours long that people still watch… Yep, quality has nothing to do with how long people stay engaged with movies!

        • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          The Intro to the film, “One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest” comes to mind.

          Great film, slow, steady, meaningful.

        • IWW4@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Bud… people are on thier phones constantly… there nothing that will stop that…

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Do the people who have their phones out in films nowadays watch those old movies without looking at their phones, hmm?

          Your snark makes you sound like an arsehole.

          • MotoAsh@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            My snark is because it was an assinine statement that was said rudely. I don’t know why you’re mad at me and not the rude person with the wrong opinion.