• MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Please do and expel our ambassadors. Close us off and isolate us. I say this because the more it happens. The more the drooling masses here are made to feel the reality of the situation the better. You simply would not believe the level of cognitive dissonance. These people are deluded.

  • netling@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    And close all US military bases in Europe. We don’t need troops from a fascist dictator on our continent.

    • Mr Poletski@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      If Donald attacks Greenland, then the EU should seize all Us military bases in Europe immediately.

    • klairman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Every day I wonder how on earth we accepted this situation, with honourable exceptions such as the French.

  • Ænima@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    The only thing these ghouls care about is money and their lives. If removing their ilk is impossible, hit their profit margins. Seriously. I don’t know why anyone with power and/or influence in this world are capitulating to this govt. and the cry-baby-bitches currently holding the reigns.

    If Fascism is Capitalism when it’s threatened by progressive ideas, then stopping it requires might and/or money. If the world can’t stop the might of a rouge nation, stop the money instead. Make this country suffer economically and you’ll see them fold faster than the Democrats did when the shutdown threatened holiday travel and consumer spending!

  • yuumei@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sell US treasuries, or maybe Kier could stop buying them like they are 2 for 1

  • thefluffiest@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Good step, but we need to go further. Kick out all US companies. Block all big tech services, kick out McDonalds, oil companies, accountancy firms, block import of all General Motors cars. No more Apple stores, sorry. Block sales of microchip lithography machines. Close their factories and nationalize them.

    Then, for good measure, dump all US bonds the ECB holds.

    Thén have a talk.

    • Babalugats@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      But then where will all of the backhanders come from? For example, privacy is not a God given right, it’s something that we should have to fight tooth and nail for - according to these same people that are currently fighting to monetise our privacy and ‘eyeing’ the freezing of a trade deal that they have probably already been paid half for, for agreeing to it in principal. Many of them, themselves fighting to clear their names of taking payments for agreements or contracts be they Pfizer, Apple, Google, Microsoft or any other mainly US company. They, nor their children or grandchildren will be held accountable or even have to deal with whatever comes as a result of this. So realistically don’t care. Denmark citizens might get lucky with some deal that exempts them from all sorts of bullshit coming down the line that we won’t know about until it’s far too late.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Block sales of microchip lithography machines.

      Good one. Revoke restrictions on sales to countries US blocks too. China will pay more than US. Dissolving NATO is the big one. New alliance with those willing in Europe with Russia and China is needed.

      Trump has admitted that he doesn’t care about any resources in Greenland (very expensive to develop and far from markets. Rare earths are for people who want to build EVs and wind turbines). This means that the only purpose of replacing NATO bases with US bases there is to be closer to striking/threatening Europe. If US has cozy/colonial role over Europe and it wanted to target Russia, then it would use EU/NATO bases to do it, and EU, as loyal puppy, is totally accommodating and supportive of that suicidal mission. US control of Greenland, within a colonial NATO, offers 0 additional threat platforms against Russia.

      When the US says it is a national security priority for it to control Greenland, it is automatically a much bigger national security priority for Europe to control it, and then needing to use Russia and China’s help to control it.

      • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        China will pay more than US. Dissolving NATO is the big one. New alliance with those willing in Europe with Russia and China is needed.

        Allying with other fascist enemy nations is not a productive way to fight back against the usa.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Propaganda for corrupt “liberal supremacy” is what is threatening you, and will destroy you, if you allow your rulers, whose political capital is entirely given to them by the CIA, to continue delivery your soul to US colonial master. When CIA and oligarchy are given free speech, their supremacist speech, bribery, extortion power drowns out all other speech, and the liberalism values justification of the fascist supremacism is a lie.

          Allying with multi polar world was always consistent with genuine democratic values compared to “thou shalt diminish and kill those less liberal and CIA-ruled than us.” It is absolute only path to defending Europe from USA. CIA inspired “values” are not there to help.

          • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I get that you’re deep into some strange conspiracy theories. But no, aligning with fascist enemy nations is not a democratic value. It is also not the only path to defending the eu by any stretch of the imagination when nuclear weapons exist.

            • Splanda@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Nationalism is the strange conspiracy I found myself surrounded by. Historical revisionism is an even more confounding concept for me to consider

  • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    3 days ago

    The greatest weapon against the US is not bombs or military. It’s selling us shit! We can’t survive in isolation, consumer economy has fucked us for decades. Cut all trade and stop selling us products. Then we fall fast.

  • redlemace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    3 days ago

    Cut all trade. Damn, usa boycot came to the pathetic level i’m not even accepting american-english when installing an o/s. It’s a common default, but i scroll to uk or canadian english. Pathetic, i know, yet here we are.

    • Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is why I support Mark Carney in using British spellings and words. Let’s gut out all the American influence from our English.

        • kubofhromoslav@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          If you are website enjoyer, https://lernu.net/ is a solid, free of charge web course in many languages, with big community.

          I have also heard good reviews on the Zagreb Method - https://esperanto12.net/

          If you prefer apps, https://www.duolingo.com/ works great in English, if a lot of examples is your way to go.

          Of you are a book person, I have read that “Complete Esperanto” by Tim Owen is highly acclaimed. Also “Esperanto per rekta metodo” (“Esperanto by direct method”, so directly on Esperanto with elimination of translations) works great for many people.

          Some very basic stuff, mostly list of common phases for traveling, it’s available at Wikivoyage, in several languages 👇 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q143#sitelinks-wikivoyage

          Using Anki flashcards helps to memorize words, but I am not using it so I am not sure where to find the data to use…

          If you prefer in-person course, you may ask people from the Esperanto organization in your country (see https://uea.org/landoj), or visit some meeting to get in-depth answers and make new friends (see https://eventaservo.org/).

          Ultimately, it depends on your learning style to select (or create) a learning process, but these are solid. Enjoy, and please comment here after some time about your progress. I would love to know!

        • kubofhromoslav@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          English, as an national language, is great for national communication.

          But using national language for international communication is like using black-white television to watch a color movie - it kind of works, but it definitely loses a lot.

          There are at least 2 important factors:

          1. neutrality: English used for international communication favors people from English speaking countries. Inside of Europe that is not to big problem, because Ireland and Malta, while being great counties, have relatively small population - so English can work as a reasonably neutral language for European communication. But when it comes to Europe in world - English is used but a country that left us and by country that wages trade war against us. That highlights that English definitely is not a worldwide neutral language.

          2. ease of use: Esperanto was designed to be easy to learn and use, while functioning very well as a mean of communication. It does not carry a burden of centuries of non-systemic evolution, so it does not have things like irregular verbs. It’s grammar is very regular with simple rules. It enables creating words with a set of prefixes and sufixes so one does not need to learn a bunch of new (different) words about related things (like: to eat, to snack, to feast, food, meal, cantina, utensils, etc. - they are manĝi, manĝeti, manĝegi, manĝo, manĝaĵo, manĝejo, manĝiloj etc). Experience shows that learning Esperanto is 5-10x faster that learning national languages. It’s just much not efficient.

          Than comes other factors, like pushing some way of thinking, usual for one specific nation, to all humankind, atc, but those 2 are the basic ones.

        • Nico198X@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          English is just not great as an international language. It is one because of imperialistic history.

          Between the US and brexit, it’s a great incentive to maybe move on.

          Year of Esperanto here we come! XD

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      i scroll to uk or canadian english. Pathetic, i know, yet here we are.

      Dude. This entire country is boycotting the US out of sheer spite. You cannot out-petty us all, so carry on.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Unitedstatesian here: boycott us. Seriously, do it. I’m not kidding. This isn’t a joke, or sarcastic. From where I’m standing, it looks like a popular grassroots response could be the strongest response the EU is going to be giving in the near to mid term future.

    Also, I hope your leaders are preparing contingency plans, but the time to do that was honestly way back in 2016-17 when it became apparent what his intentions and predilections were. I am concerned that it could be too little, too late, with regards to establishing independent European security that cannot be fundamentally undermined by our now-fascist government.

    • Amberskin@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m sorry to say this but what the world needs is you to be inflicted an humiliating, clear military defeat somewhere. Maybe losing a carrier, maybe getting some of those B2 shot down in one of those ‘beautiful bombings’. You (and the world) need to see your military is not unbreakable and pretending to be the owners of the world is not going to end well.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Unfortunately, the US military remains extremely competent - for now, at least. There are already beginnings of ironically Stalin-esque ideological purges in the military leadership, and the procurement choices this regime has made have been… impressively idiotic, in pretty much all domains.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Oh yep, that too. Boycott investing in US stuff, if you weren’t already. And then tell your MPs or legislators or whatever term is relevant in your country that you want them to push for divesting from US sovereign debt as a national policy.

    • TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Let’s give everyone uniting against EPP hegemony cred this time, this is encouraging development politically, even if I wasn’t able to understand how much power the parliament has on this issue (?)