A veteran jazz ensemble and a New York dance company have canceled events at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, intensifying the fallout at one of the nation’s pre-eminent arts centers after it was renamed to include President Trump.

The center had previously promoted two New Year’s Eve performances by the Cookers as an “all-star jazz septet that will ignite the Terrace Theater stage with fire and soul.” But those performances, like an annual Christmas Eve jazz concert hosted by Chuck Redd, are now canceled.

The Cookers did not give a reason for the decision in a statement on Monday that said, “Jazz was born from struggle and from a relentless insistence on freedom: freedom of thought, of expression, and of the full human voice.”

But the band’s drummer, Billy Hart, told The New York Times that the center’s name change had “evidently” played a role. He acknowledged that the group was concerned about possible reprisals.

  • bthest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    It wasn’t renamed. The office of president doesn’t have the power.

    Fuck all of this collaborationist media gaslighting horseshit.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    What in the ever loving FUCK is GOING ON THERE in the US. This is the kind of silly shit you expect from a third world dictatorship. He really just… renamed the fucking thing and put his own name first. That’s just utterly disrespectful, not to mention distasteful in general.

    It used to be you had to at least die in order to get your name put on things….

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Cookers did not give a reason for the decision in a statement on Monday that said, “Jazz was born from struggle and from a relentless insistence on freedom: freedom of thought, of expression, and of the full human voice.”

    It sounds like they gave a reason to me.

  • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    This motherfucker is the Jordan of bankruptcies. I mean failing at a Casino was already Master-level, but this takes the pie.

  • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    People say the name was changed illegally. I’m out of the loop on this, why is it illegal for their name to be changed?

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have to say, even if they’d changed it legally, it would not diminish my disgust one bit. To name something so public, that you had no part in creating, after yourself is the ultimate … tastelessness, fuck you to the plebs, loser move, etc.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Donald J Trump is the most unpopular U.S. president the modern world has ever experienced, so one could argue that a) by smearing his shitty name on a once-respected venue, Trump made the place political and b) by literally changing the name of the venue, the artist can claim they are no longer legally bound by their original contract, which was with the John F Kennedy Performing ArtsCenter and NOT the Donald Trump by way of the JFK Performing Arts Center.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Among other reasons, board members who would’ve dissented were forcibly muted in the videoconference meeting during the “unanimous” vote.

    • FilthyHands@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      In his own words…

      Sec. 2 Policy. (a) It is the policy of the United States to prosecute to the fullest extent permitted under Federal law, and as appropriate, any person or any entity that destroys, damages, vandalizes, or desecrates a monument, memorial, or statue within the United States or otherwise vandalizes government property. The desire of the Congress to protect Federal property is clearly reflected in section 1361 of title 18, United States Code, which authorizes a penalty of up to 10 years’ imprisonment for the willful injury of Federal property. More recently, under the Veterans’ Memorial Preservation and Recognition Act of 2003, section 1369 of title 18, United States Code, the Congress punished with the same penalties the destruction of Federal and in some cases State-maintained monuments that honor military veterans. Other criminal statutes, such as the Travel Act, section 1952 of title 18, United States Code, permit prosecutions of arson damaging monuments, memorials, and statues on State grounds in some cases. Civil statutes like the Public System Resource Protection Act, section 100722 of title 54, United States Code, also hold those who destroy certain Federal property accountable for their offenses. The Federal Government will not tolerate violations of these and other laws.