• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Let me get this straight.

    AI is trying to be used to influence peoples opinions online, potentially as a tactic to sway public opinion on politics, and help sway elections.

    And now, the AI has become racist. So, it’s now trying to promote and normalize the concept of casual racism.

    Ugh! Nobody is going to fall for that! People will easily be able to see how wrong that is, and how stupid it would be to elect racists.

    looks at who the current president is

    …yeah, I may have overestimated the american voting public here. We’re fucked.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It has deliberately been created racist, because racism, alongside all of the other bigotries, are effective ways for oligarchs to get the rabble to do their bidding and forget their actual problems.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That is not how anything works. Hatred and bigotry is easy to spread because they are simple low effort messages, anti-racism isn’t. It requires thought and context, everything the target audience for racism lacks.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It doesn’t work that way; peddling bigotry and hate is an asymmetric tactic. It’s a lot easier to make slop that triggers people’s base fears in their lizard brain than it is to appeal to their enlightened sense of reasoning.

      See also: Brandolini’s Law.

      • Zombie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Brandolini’s law (or the bullshit asymmetry principle) is an Internet adage coined in 2013 by Italian programmer Alberto Brandolini. It compares the considerable effort of debunking misinformation to the relative ease of creating it in the first place. The adage states:

        The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it.[1][2]

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini’s_law

    • greenbit@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Iirc it takes like 6-8 times more exposure to true information to correct disinformation. Damage is done quite fast in the meantime and racist/capitalist content is widely prevalent and systematic