Context: PugJesus often spams low quality posts across the dozen or so communities they mod, apparently downvoting low effort spam on my frontpage is trolling. The only other action in the modlog is a different ban for 74 years for “Mass downvoting innocuous content,” so it definitely seems they are just banning people that dislike their spam. Glad we’re not missing out on the reddit mod experience here.

  • Skavau@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Has nothing to do with sensitivity. Just simply not wanting new posts to be buried because of random repeat downvoters who clearly have no interest in the community. My community is now long-past this, but it wasn’t always.

        • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Oh I was confused by the way you called people trolls so I thought you called people trolls my bad obviously /s

            • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              3 days ago

              People who downvote posts in your community… I am not sure what you are trying to do by denying it? It is right there you can go reread what you wrote…

              • Skavau@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                I never called them trolls for doing that.

                Also, you misunderstand me. I would only ban users who mass downvote and never contribute. I don’t ban users for downvotes here and there.

                • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I am not misunderstanding you, you are misunderstanding me. What I am saying is that “only ban users who mass downvote and never contribute” is wrong, both factually wrong and morally wrong. An individual can’t mass vote, a vote is a contribution. You are not a reasonable person, you know this by now right?

                  • Skavau@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I am not misunderstanding you, you are misunderstanding me. What I am saying is that “only ban users who mass downvote and never contribute” is wrong, both factually wrong and morally wrong.

                    How can it be factually wrong?

                    I also disagree that it’s morally wrong.

                    An individual can’t mass vote, a vote is a contribution. You are not a reasonable person, you know this by now right?

                    By “mass vote” I mean someone going down and downvoting every single post in the community. Not on a single post.

                  • Wren@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    An individual can’t mass vote, a vote is a contribution.

                    Let me introduce you to Pfeffy. Not the only user like that, either.