• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I only learned like last year that you can keep convening grand juries until you get one that indicts. Seems kind of strange to me

    • Null User Object@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      But in the past it wasn’t necessary because, as the saying went, you could get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich. The bar to indictment is incredibly low. So, it’s actually extremely embarrassing to have the media talking about how you keep trying and failing.

      Edit: I should have said it was rarely necessary.

    • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They generally don’t though because the burden to indict is SIGNFICANTLY lower than the burden to convict. Anyone that you cannot even get an indictment for isn’t likely to be convicted at trial.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah, except that dealing with a legal defense costs a lot of time and money. So even if they can’t convict they can use the courts as a means to punish.

        Really shows how much our legal system needs an overhaul to prevent abuse like this.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It makes sense though. It’s not an actual trial, just a test to see if the prosecution has strong enough evidence to support an indictment. If not, they keep digging.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        While true, Federal prosecutors historically don’t even bother with charges if they’re not sure of a conviction. This is just explicit evidence that this DOJ is both incompetent and focused on politics not justice.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yeah, 100% the system is being abused. But like the Comey thing, they still need to follow the right procedures or it will backfire.

  • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Just keep bringing in more grand juries against her until you either get an indictment or she dies, either way she’s tied up for life.

    It’s a DDoJ. Distributed-denial-of-justice.

  • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    The fact there’s no double-jeopardy (triple? quadruple? Something not infinite at least?!) for indictments astounds me.

    Then again it shouldn’t surprise any more – the US system seems to have a billion holes, like swiss-cheese, only left unexploited up until recently because those in power had, maybe, some small shred of shame and decency. All those loopholes must be absolutely sewn shut, and ‘conventions’ and ‘gentlemenly guardrails’ need to be made hard, fast, and most importantly ENFORCED laws if the country is to ever recover. I’m not hopeful.