I’ve been considering getting a flagpole just for combat with my MAGA neighbors. Getting one higher than any of the ones they have.

I will admit, they all have stopped flying their Trump flags in the last few months, only the American flag on those poles now. And one even recently replaced the flag that was wind damaged a few weeks ago, so that’s a conscious change to only fly the one flag. At least it’s a step in the right direction, however small.

Yous be surprised.

And this is clearly on a door to a card shop. Magic tournaments are infamous for individuals that have terrible hygiene.

Give you one guess.

The “charitable donations” are the community’s socially required tithes to the Mormon church.

Not exactly the same as everywhere else.

He definitely says “one of us”.

https://youtube.com/shorts/qOuavWu9a1E

Or just public school in the south.

Only because the Republican base don’t make enough money to travel internationally in the first place.

By that logic every website on the Internet is fascist because someone set up a website about fascism somewhere.

Oh look, just like I said in one of the original threads, “dragged” was actually the officer holding onto the car or door handle.

Is Uber saying no? Or are drivers cancelling rides when they realize there’s an animal that wasn’t disclosed previously, and they aren’t part of Uber Pets?

Because there’s a distinct difference there.

But it’s up to the driver whether to allow an animal in their personal vehicle.

It’s not about training. People lie, and there is no way to verify service animals. Lying about pets and claiming they are service animals is already an issue for places like restaurants and hotels.

if Uber requires all drivers to allow pets, then so be it. But that’s the only way to ensure consistency.

That does happen, usually that’s more how traditional cabs operate, and even then in many places they own the cab and contract to a company for fares.

The vast majority of rideshare drivers in the US use their own vehicle.

First off, FUCK UBER… but I don’t see Uber being at any sort of fault here unless their policy is no animals, which it obviously isn’t because Uber Pet exists. Only possibly by not routing service animal rides through Uber Pet exclusively since those drivers are already expecting animals.

Do we really want to say that in order to participate in rideshare driving at all that you must allow animals in your private vehicle?

Uber drivers use their own vehicles, they are not Uber’s property or responsibility. If an owner doesn’t want animals in their vehicle, they cannot and should not be forced to. A lot of people don’t want animals in their vehicles, trained or not. They may be worried about damage from things like claws to the fabrics, etc. and don’t want to deal with that possibility, whereas the Uber Pet drivers are prepared for that.

And this doesn’t even get into the bastards that lie about their pets and “emotional support” animals being service animals causing problems for those that actually do need the assistance. There’s no penalty for lying about it, and no verification system to filter those out.

Or you know, you can work to fix the source of some of the existing issues. Like limit the number of single family dwellings a company or corporation can own. Hedge funds and banks shouldn’t be able to hoard houses as real estate. Tax unoccupied housing at a higher rate, increasing based on vacancy time to incentivize usage instead of leaving them empty. Use that increased tax revenue to fund building public housing.

It’s a reach that the state is effectively run by the Mormon church? And that should be taken into account as relevant context when the Governor makes statements? Seriously?

You seem to also ignore the context that Utah is essentially a Mormon-run state. And the Mormons there actively villify and expel anyone that refuses to accept their doctrine.

It’s never as simple as the words being said when politics or religion are involved. And here it’s both in spades.

It’s not genius, that’s how political dynasties work. It’s why having entire families in politics usually leads to terrible outcomes.

The article mentions other documentation about primary residence, but doesn’t link to it as far as I can tell.

To play devil’s advocate a bit, plans and decisions change. At one point in time you can have one property a primary residence and later decide that you would rather use a different one as a primary.

Were these around the same time? Were they years apart? What are the legal requirements if you want to change your primary residence? None of that seems to be covered here as far as I can tell but is directly related to the topic and legality.

The fact she has 3-4 homes all over the place is excessive honestly, but neither here nor there about the legality here.

What a pathetic excuse for an elected leader. Almost crying because the shooter was “one of them” and not their fake “enemy”.