• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    He beat Cuomo by almost 10% in spite of all the things mentioned in the post. That’s the opposite of “barely made it” and thus a GREAT sign for progressives.

    And before you mention that Adams won his general election by a bigger margin: he was only running against that lunatic Sliwa and had the entire establishment on his side, so a blowout was pretty much a given the moment he barely eked out a win in the primaries with TONS of assistance.

    • justaregularthrowaway@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Ah, I meant barely an absolute majority. From what I understand, Cuomo shouldn’t have been a serious contender either. But I guess in the current landscape he’s a middle of the road kinda guy…

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        From what I understand, Cuomo shouldn’t have been a serious contender either.

        That’s the rub: your understanding of just how massive and powerful the establishment apparatus he was up against is appears to be woefully lacking.

        But I guess in the current landscape he’s a middle of the road kinda guy

        And much more importantly, the guy that the establishment overwhelmingly favors. That’s the REAL challenge much more than Cuomo himself.

        • justaregularthrowaway@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          So the establishment is that good in shaping opinions that an obvious asshat like Cuomo can be made into a decent option for that many folks? Somehow, I expected better of New York ers. Anyway it does mean that other progressives will be up against the same challenge, in places where I assume the establishment is even better in shaping opinions and turnout…

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            So the establishment is that good in shaping opinions that an obvious asshat like Cuomo can be made into a decent option for that many folks?

            In a word: yes.

            Anyway it does mean that other progressives will be up against the same challenge

            And sometimes also win.

            in places where I assume the establishment is even better in shaping opinions and turnout…

            Unlikely. With the possible exceptions of Chicago and the California statewide elections, New York is THE home of establishment Democrats. It’s where both Schumer and Jeffries come from, not to mention the NYT and countless Neoliberal “strategists” (read: propagandist apparatchiks)

            • justaregularthrowaway@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Oh dear, so when you say establishment you mean specifically the Democrat establishment… So you think the main battle is within the democratic movement, and once they’re up against the whole Republican dominated media empire they actually have more of a chance? (Thanks for your patience with me, it’s hard to get this kind of insights through international media)

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                when you say establishment you mean specifically the Democrat establishment

                I mean the entire establishment, but since we’re talking about NY, the Democrat establishment is more relevant than the rest, yes.

                So you think the main battle is within the democratic movement, and once they’re up against the whole Republican dominated media empire they actually have more of a chance?

                In the NYC mayoral election? Without a doubt. Other than the Juliani-Bloomberg anomaly, there hasn’t been a Republican mayor of New York City since the 1960s.

                Thanks for your patience with me, it’s hard to get this kind of insights through international media

                No worries, it’s nice to explain things to someone who’s genuinely curious rather than desperately trying to cling to their pet misinformation for once 😁