Andrew Cuomo, an elderly has-been, the lesser son of a greater sire, who as governor literally conspired with Republicans to hand them control of the New York state Senate for half a decade; who resigned from office in disgrace after he was credibly accused of 13 instances of sexual harassment; and whose campaign quite obviously had no purpose other than satisfying his own lust for accumulating personal power, along with that of his billionaire donors.

As the campaign progressed and Mamdani’s victory became ever more likely, Cuomo descended into vindictive gutter racism. He did not disagree with a right-wing radio host who said that Mamdani would be “cheering” another 9/11, suggested that Mamdani would have Muslim women “completely covered up,” and that he “doesn’t understand New York culture” because he’s a “citizen of Uganda.”

Cuomo happily took Donald Trump’s endorsement and went on Fox News to tout it. His closing campaign message, as The Nation’s Jeet Heer pointed out on Bluesky, smacked of Vidkun Quisling—implicitly threatening New Yorkers with a Trumpian occupation if they voted for anyone but Cuomo.

It was disgusting stuff. But it also was palpably desperate, and coming from one of the worst candidates imaginable…

What we see, I think, are a bunch of rich guys who have been comically out of touch with normal people for many decades, and more recently have blowtorched their brains into a smoking pile of ash on Elon Musk’s Twitter/X and in various group chats. It’s why they got so worked up about Mamdani in the first place—the New York City mayoralty is not some omnipotent office, and there are a dozen ways to hem it in at the state and local level if they so wished. What these oligarchs spent to stop Mamdani feels like less on an annual basis than he wants them to pay for a better future for all New Yorkers, a joke Mamdani himself has made.

In any case, his slight tax increase on rich people, free buses, and city-run grocery stores are pretty far from a communist revolution. But that’s not how it appears to rich people, surrounded on all sides by yes-men and toadies, who spend several hours a day marinating in an online Nazi sewer.

  • xyzzy@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Back in 1933, Robert Sterling Clark, one of the heirs to the Singer sewing machine fortune, was worth what would today be about $1 billion. He had no profession other than professional rich person: art collector, horse breeder, financier…

    He famously said in the course of plotting a coup to overthrow FDR, “If I have to spend half my money to protect the other half, I’ll do it.” He meant spending half his money to finance a coup.

    These useless scions of wealthy families really do think that the socialists are coming for all their money, either through taxation or unrestrained spending leading to inflation. They did absolutely nothing to deserve it in the first place, but they’ll commit treason to hoard it, if necessary.

    • dellish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      But I bet if he was told he had to pay half his money as tax and the other half would absolutely be left alone, he would complain its a bad deal. Being rich is such a bizarre mind virus.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It was disgusting stuff. But it also was palpably desperate, and coming from one of the worst candidates imaginable…

    And yet 40% voted for him.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It also went up from earlier polls after the Trump endorsement, which helped minimize the impact of the actual GOP runner Silva.

      Bigotry is certainly a strong sell to a large chunk of voters, but hell I think the red scare bullshit was probably even stronger. It’s wild how many people are still capitalist brainwashed and have no idea that socialism isn’t communism (or that either isn’t inherently bad somehow).

      • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The red scare bullshit worked on the basis of having an actual State that was directly militarily opposed to the U.S.

        Since there is no actual democratic socialist military enemy right now, and there are Muslim allied countries, it’s a really hard to sell him as being a traitor. During the red scare, it was super easy. You also had the FBI straight up prosecuting people and blocking careers for associating with the Communist party.

        In my observation, the GOP is trying desperately to get back to that level of authoritarian control, but I don’t think they can anymore.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    16 hours ago

    excluding sliwa voters, the gap between mamdani and cuomo was the same as in the primary, which is incredibly shitty when you think about it

    • Platypus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The quoted line omits the beginning “on the other.” It still doesn’t technically have a verb, but the construction makes the implied “is” perfectly coherent.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Yeah, either of those helps. I agree it’s comprehensible.

        Comprehensibility isn’t what defines a sentence fragment. I make this observation out of pure awe, rather than criticism. Modern day Cicero vibes.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      He’s a politician

      Yes…

      Everyone who holds a political office, is a politician.

      Very astute observation…

      • F/15/[email protected]@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        37
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I’m suggesting that you avoid becoming parasocial with a professional politician before he even has a chance to demonstrate his values and capacity, and you took that as an attack on you, personally?

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I’m suggesting that you avoid becoming parasocial

          No, mainly because no one was doing that and you made a top level comment…

          Like, maybe that’s what you meant to do, and thought you were doing, but you didn’t.

          before he even has a chance to demonstrate his values and capacity

          He didn’t spring into existence fully formed the first time you heard his name…

          and you took that as an attack on you, personally?

          What? Why would you think I took your comment as a personal attack against myself?

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              18 hours ago

              But why would your first thought be that the other person felt personally attacked and is just lashing out?

              Do you not understand how many issues in life people have when they follow Kanye West logic?

              Maybe if people are dismissive of your opinions, they have valid reasons?

              You can open dialog and ask why people are dissimive of your opinions, and that would be productive for you and the people who take the time to help.

              Because the less people in society use Kanye West logic, the better society is for everyone.

              And I know this may feel like a tangent, but I’m just trying to help in a much broader way that will be more useful for you

              • F/15/[email protected]@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Because you’ve either taken what I’ve said to be so intensely stupid that it’s worthy of ridicule or so offensive to your being that you refuse to accept that hero worship and politics aren’t a solid mix. Given the state of politics, I assumed the latter. If it’s the former, there’s a baseline level of misunderstanding that I can’t as easily overcome.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  17 hours ago

                  that hero worship

                  Again, no one was doing that…

                  And while my blocklist is healthy, I havent seen anything I would categorize as “hero worship” about Mamdani. Can you provide even a single example of this “hero worship”?

                  It really seems like you’re just misinterpreting things or not understanding them and just leaping to wild accusations instead of simply asking for clarification.

                  I’m trying to help you understand why that’s bad, because people that think like that make society very unpleasant for the rest of us.

        • galaxy_nova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          It’s somewhat ironic you would claim that they took this personally when your argument is about being objective towards other people. Your argument has no legs since it is in fact a soggy piece of bread.

      • webadict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Woah man, you can’t just say that politicians rape women without consequences.

        They also rape children, too.

    • DarkGamer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Even if he accomplishes nothing, he’s trying to do good and improve things. His ideas have been proven popular. That’s a huge improvement over what we had before.

      • F/15/[email protected]@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I love that he’s proven popular. But the number of darling democrats turned republican or no-name, in recent years, has tempered my expectations. New York has him for a few years. Nothing can change about that. Now we can only observe and hope